Delhi High Court

92,849 judgments

Year:

Times Innovative Media Ltd v. OOH Media Solution Pvt Ltd

04 Sep 2014 · G. S. Sistani · 2014:DHC:4408

The Delhi High Court decreed recovery of Rs.34,32,590 with interest in favor of the plaintiff for unpaid advertising services rendered under a valid contract, proceeding ex parte against the absent defendant.

civil appeal_allowed commercial contract recovery of money interest at commercial rate Order XXXVII CPC

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd v. East Delhi Municipal Corporation

04 Sep 2014 · Manmohan J · 2014:DHC:4407
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed writ petitions challenging property tax demands on petrol pump sites, directing the Municipal Taxation Tribunal to decide on lease or licence status and property tax liability after deposit of principal sum.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant property tax lease vs licence Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957

Sunil v. State NCT of Delhi

04 Sep 2014 · Indermeet Kaur, J. · 2014:DHC:4406

The Delhi High Court upheld the rape conviction based on credible prosecutrix testimony corroborated by medical and scientific evidence, rejecting the appellant's alibi and false implication claims.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape prosecutrix testimony Section 376 IPC alibi plea

Vodafone India Ltd. and Ors. v. Telecom Regulatory Authority of India

04 Sep 2014 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2017:DHC:5063
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that TRAI's refusal to share the cost model during consultation on interconnection charges does not violate its statutory duty of transparency under Section 11(4) of the TRAI Act, dismissing the petition challenging the process.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Mobile Termination Charges Interconnection Usage Charges Transparency

Arun Bhardwaj v. Onicra Credit Rating Agency of India Ltd.

03 Sep 2014 · Gita Mittal; Sunil Gaur · 2014:DHC:4384-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the refusal to entertain a winding-up petition where the respondent company raised a bona fide and substantial dispute over the claimed debt.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant winding-up petition Companies Act 1956 bona fide dispute debt recovery

Tausif & Ors. v. State

03 Sep 2014 · S. Muralidhar · 2014:DHC:4359

The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for attempted murder based on clear eyewitness and medical evidence despite non-recovery of the weapon and minor inconsistencies, while reducing the sentence considering time served.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 307 IPC attempted murder injured eyewitness non-recovery of weapon

Paramjeet Singh @ Pummy v. State

03 Sep 2014 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2014:DHC:4391

The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail for an accused involved in assault, holding that bail parity with co-accused granted regular bail is not automatic and evading arrest until bail is granted amounts to abuse of court process.

criminal appeal_dismissed anticipatory bail Section 438 CrPC parity in bail abuse of process

Jhalani Tools Workers Union Faridabad v. M/S Jhalani Tools India Limited (In Liquidation)

03 Sep 2014 · Gita Mittal; Sunil Gaur · 2014:DHC:4383-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the workers' appeal to enforce a One Time Settlement in liquidation proceedings by directing restoration of diverted funds and lumpsum payment to the settled workers, modifying the pro-rata distribution order.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant One Time Settlement Official Liquidator Company Liquidation Workers' Claims

Harley v. State

03 Sep 2014 · S.P. Garg · 2014:DHC:4363

The Delhi High Court affirmed the appellant's conviction for criminal conspiracy under the NDPS Act based on disclosure statements and call records, while modifying the sentence on appeal.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant criminal conspiracy NDPS Act Section 21(b) Section 29

South Asia LPG Company Private Limited v. Competition Commission of India and Ors.

03 Sep 2014 · Chief Justice; Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2014:DHC:4362-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the Competition Commission of India is not required to give notice or hearing to the affected party before directing further investigation under Section 26(7) of the Competition Act, 2002, dismissing the appellant's challenge on natural justice grounds.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Competition Act, 2002 Section 26(7) further investigation natural justice

Kamlesh Mittal & Ors. v. Oriental Insurance Co Ltd & Ors.

03 Sep 2014 · Jayant Nath · 2014:DHC:4389

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by accepting the deceased's latest income tax return income and reducing personal expense deduction from 50% to one-third, following Sarla Verma guidelines.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 compensation loss of dependency personal expenses deduction

Vidhya v. Adesh Kumar Jain

03 Sep 2014 · Jayant Nath · 2014:DHC:4388

Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by applying future prospects and multiplier adjustments and awarded additional future medical expenses subject to conditions.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 compensation loss of earning capacity future prospects

Commissioner of Income Tax-II v. M/s ML Outsourcing Services (P) Limited

03 Sep 2014 · Sanjiv Khanna; V. Kameswar Rao · 2014:DHC:4387-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's decision that IT-enabled human resource services provided by the assessee qualify for exemption under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as per CBDT Notification S.O. 890(E).

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 10A Income Tax Act human resource services information technology enabled services Notification S.O. 890(E)

Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi -I v. Shri Ram Udyog & Ors.

03 Sep 2014 · Sanjiv Khanna; V. Kameswar Rao · 2014:DHC:4386-DB

The Delhi High Court held that appeals before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal require approval from a committee of Chief Commissioners only if the original order was passed by a Commissioner, allowing the appeal where approval was given by a committee of Commissioners for an order passed by a subordinate officer.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Section 35B Central Excise Act Committee of Chief Commissioners Committee of Commissioners Appeal maintainability

M/S LEA INTERNATIONAL LIMITED v. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX

03 Sep 2014 · Sanjiv Khanna; V. Kameswar Rao · 2014:DHC:4385-DB

The Delhi High Court held that bona fide reliance on a contractual exemption and full disclosure in the return negates concealment, setting aside penalty under Section 271(1)(c) for non-resident consultancy income.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 271(1)(c) Section 10(8A) Penalty for concealment

ABIR INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD v. TEESTAVALLEY POWER TRANSMISSION LIMITED

03 Sep 2014 · Manmohan Singh · 2014:DHC:4361

The Delhi High Court held that invocation of conditional bank guarantees must strictly comply with their terms and the underlying contract, restraining wrongful and fraudulent invocation and encashment pending arbitration.

civil petition_allowed Significant bank guarantee invocation conditional bank guarantee Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Consortium of Deepak Cable India Limited and Abir Infrastructure Pvt Ltd v. Teestavalley Power Transmission Limited

03 Sep 2014 · Manmohan Singh · 2014:DHC:4360

The Delhi High Court held that the respondent validly terminated the contract for petitioner’s default and refused interim relief restraining termination, directing disputes to be resolved by arbitration.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 9 interim relief Contract termination Right of Way

Harsh Vardhan Nayyar v. Shanti Mathur & Ors.

03 Sep 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:4390

The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of eviction petitions under the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that the landlord failed to prove bona fide necessity to occupy the premises for opening a drama school.

property appeal_dismissed Significant bona fide necessity Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 eviction petition rent control

Pawan @ Amit @ Tinku v. State NCT of Delhi

03 Sep 2014 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2014:DHC:4375-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of the appellant for rape and illegal confinement of a four-year-old girl, affirming the sufficiency of victim testimony corroborated by medical and forensic evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape of minor illegal confinement child victim testimony medical evidence

The Bhajanpura Cooperative Urban Thrift & Credit Society Ltd. v. Prabhu Dayal

03 Sep 2014 · S.P. Garg · 2014:DHC:4366

The High Court of Delhi dismissed the criminal appeal filed by The Bhajanpura Cooperative Urban Thrift & Credit Society Ltd. as not maintainable, relying on a detailed common judgment in a related case.

criminal appeal_dismissed Procedural appeal maintainability criminal appeal High Court of Delhi