Delhi High Court
92,849 judgments
Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. v. Silor Associates S.A.
The Delhi High Court held that Court assistance under Section 27 of the Arbitration Act is intended for evidence from third parties, not parties themselves, and upheld the Tribunal's power to direct document production, dismissing BHEL's appeal against the refusal of Court assistance.
Mohd. Mustkim Ansari v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Mohd. Mustkim Ansari for murdering his wife, rejecting his alibi and relying on circumstantial evidence and extra-judicial confession.
Prem Sagar Jain v. M/S Aditya Overseas and Anr.
The Delhi High Court decreed the plaintiff's suit for recovery of Rs.44,44,755/- against defendants who failed to prove their objections, awarding interest and costs.
Commissioner of Income Tax-II v. M/S. Lakshmi Sugar Mills Co. Limited
The Delhi High Court held that unpaid excise duty on manufactured goods lying in stock cannot be allowed as expenditure under Sections 43B and 145A of the Income Tax Act, remanding the matter for fresh factual determination.
Mohd. Azad Alam v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the convictions for armed dacoity based on authentic CCTV evidence and witness identification, modifying only one appellant's sentence considering his minimal role.
Mohd. Azad Alam v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for armed dacoity based on authentic CCTV evidence and eyewitness testimony, modifying only one appellant's sentence considering his minor role.
Mohd. Azad Alam v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for armed dacoity based on reliable CCTV evidence, modifying the sentence of one appellant due to his minimal role and clean record.
Mohd. Azad Alam v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for armed dacoity based on authentic CCTV evidence but reduced the sentence of one appellant with minimal involvement and no prior record.
Harsh Grover v. H.S. Bajaj and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of a tenant for non-payment of rent, holding that deposits made outside the prescribed time and procedure do not entitle the tenant to protection under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Vijay Kumar v. Puran Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of a tenant on landlord’s bonafide necessity for business expansion, emphasizing the strict 15-day limit for filing leave to defend applications under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Maha Rani v. Kayum Khan Alias Ayub Khan
The Delhi High Court held that mere filing of appeals without interim stay does not justify condoning a long delay in rent deposit, reinstating the eviction order against the tenant.
Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Sudesh Mishra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's award of compensation in a motor accident claim, affirming insurer's liability despite cheque dishonour and emphasizing the primacy of eyewitness evidence over FIR discrepancies.
Sachin Mishra & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes on the basis of an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Alam Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the exemption of BSF from RTI disclosure under Section 24, dismissing the petition seeking recruitment details absent allegations of corruption or human rights violations.
Liyakat Ali & Ors. v. The State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a neighbor dispute FIR under Sections 451/323/509/147/149 IPC based on an amicable settlement, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C., subject to payment of costs.
Ram Kishan & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Mohd Zeeshan v. Mohd Tahir
The Delhi High Court decreed specific performance of a property sale agreement where the plaintiff paid full consideration and was in possession, and the defendant failed to contest the suit.
Savita Vashist v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings arising from family disputes based on an amicable settlement, emphasizing cautious exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. in non-compoundable offences.
Savita Vashist v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings arising from family disputes based on an amicable settlement, applying inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. while upholding principles limiting quashing in serious offences.
Vishal Chaudhary & Ors. v. The State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 308, 341, and 34 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between parties, imposing costs payable to a public fund, while applying Supreme Court guidelines on quashing non-compoundable offences under Section 482 Cr.P.C.