Delhi High Court
92,849 judgments
North Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Shiv Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging eviction on bonafide necessity grounds, holding that the statutory 15-day period for leave to defend is mandatory and alternative accommodation facts not pleaded within this period cannot be considered.
Sapna Infracoloniser Pvt. Ltd. v. Dee Pearls (India) Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between Sapna Infracoloniser Pvt. Ltd. and Dee Pearls (India) Pvt. Ltd. under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, finding all statutory requirements fulfilled and no objections raised.
RPS Vikas Castings Private Limited v. GarimaVikas Metals Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed a joint application under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with meetings of secured creditors based on consents but directing court-supervised meetings of shareholders and unsecured creditors for approval of a Scheme of Amalgamation.
Pranjal Fabrication Pvt. Ltd. v. Electronica Finance Ltd.
The Delhi High Court allowed a Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with meetings of stakeholders based on consents and condoning delay in filing a Board Resolution.
Gopal Singh & Ors. v. Lt. Governor & Ors.
Judgment text insufficient to extract substantive details; refers to another order for detailed reasoning.
Indian Council of Agricultural Research and Anr. v. Shri Yog Raj Singh
The Delhi High Court held that service prior to passing the mandatory stenography test is ad-hoc and cannot be counted for ACP benefits, setting aside CAT's order granting second financial upgradation from the initial appointment date.
Satya Dev v. M/S. Gaurav Financiers
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the execution order attaching the salary of the judgment debtor to enforce a final ex parte arbitral award for loan repayment.
Yogindar Kumar Jaiswal & Ors. v. Shashibala & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order on bonafide necessity grounds allowing a landlady to settle her sons separately in residence and business despite locality objections.
Anil Kumar Gupta v. Balbir Shergill
The Delhi High Court held that a settlement recorded before the Mediation Centre without follow-up statements in court does not constitute an undertaking enforceable under the Contempt of Courts Act, and dismissed the contempt petition for non-payment under such settlement.
Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-III v. M/S. ANANT OVERSEAS P. LTD
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, holding that penalty under Section 271(1)(c) cannot be imposed without concealment or inaccurate particulars of income with mens rea, especially where the assessee disclosed all material facts and maintained separate accounts for investment and trading shares.
Ram Gopal & Anr v. Lt Governor, Govt of NCT & Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a government notification transferring employee quarters to successor distribution companies on license basis, allowing them to initiate eviction proceedings under Section 630 of the Companies Act, while leaving jurisdictional questions to the Magistrate.
Cement Corporation of India Ltd v. Life Insurance Corporation of India Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of the appellant as an unauthorized occupant under the PP Act, holding that an unexecuted lease agreement without specific performance does not confer tenancy rights.
Dhananjay Kumar @ Pyare Lal v. State (Govt. of NCT) of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of a husband for the murder of his wife based on circumstantial evidence and the failure to provide a plausible explanation under Section 106 of the Indian Evidence Act.
Anwar Ul Haque v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of Anwar Ul Haque for abduction and sexual assault of a minor, affirming the admissibility of the child's statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. and corroborative medical evidence.
Ajay Tiwari v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction for theft under Section 379 IPC based on reliable sole testimony and possession of stolen goods, rejecting acquittal despite investigative lapses.
ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. SEEMA JHAMB
The Delhi High Court upheld composite negligence liability on both vehicles' insurers and enhanced compensation by recalculating loss of dependency with future prospects and correcting deductions.
DIG K.P.S. Raghuvanshi v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the clandestine amendment of promotion criteria applied retrospectively was illegal and directed a fresh promotion board to consider the petitioner’s promotion under the unamended rules.
Nnadi K. Iheanyi v. Narcotics Control Bureau
The Delhi High Court set aside the conviction under NDPS Act due to prosecution's failure to produce the panch witness and unexplained discrepancies in heroin purity reports, granting benefit of doubt to the accused.
Timberland Company v. Rohit Bajaj & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and awarded compensatory and punitive damages to Timberland Company against defendants for manufacturing and selling counterfeit goods infringing its registered trademarks.