Delhi High Court
92,849 judgments
Rakesh and Anr v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession is not taken and compensation not paid within five years of the award.
BAL KISHAN v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings pending for over five years without possession or compensation under the 1894 Act are deemed lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Land Acquisition Act.
M/S MKM ESTATES PVT LTD v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act where possession was not taken and compensation not paid within five years of the award are deemed lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.
Hazel Properties Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession and compensation are not completed within five years of the award.
Nitin Sawhney v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings initiated under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if no possession or compensation occurs within five years prior to the 2013 Act's commencement.
Preet Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act without possession or compensation for over five years before the 2013 Act are deemed to have lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.
M/S SOPAN REAL ESTATE (P) LTD v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if no possession or compensation occurs within five years of the award.
Ravinder Kumar v. Govt. of NCT Delhi
Recovery of alleged excess pay from a Group-C employee retiring within one year is impermissible without prior undertaking, quashing the recovery order under State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih.
Harish & Ors. v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC, holding that a settlement without the complainant's free consent cannot justify quashing non-compoundable offences.
M/S. VIR ARJUN NEWSPAPERS PVT. LTD. v. THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, DELHI
The Delhi High Court held that M/s Vir Arjun Newspapers Pvt. Ltd. is a continuation of the old establishment Daily Vir Arjun and is not entitled to infancy protection under the Employees' Provident Funds Act, 1952.
Salil Maheshwari v. High Court of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the DJS Preliminary Examination answer key, holding that answer keys in multiple-choice exams are presumed correct unless demonstrably wrong, and re-evaluation cannot be directed without statutory authority.
Keshav Kumar v. State
The High Court set aside the appellant's conviction under Sections 306 and 498A IPC due to lack of proof of marriage and cohabitation with the deceased, emphasizing the necessity of foundational facts for applying presumptions under the Evidence Act.
Lt. Gen. Tejinder Singh v. CBI
The Delhi High Court granted bail to a retired Lt. General charged under the Prevention of Corruption Act, holding that non-arrest and voluntary appearance favor bail unless strong reasons exist to deny it.
A.K. Chaturvedi v. C.B.I.
The Delhi High Court quashed the trial court order framing charges against petitioners for alleged misrepresentation and conspiracy in coal block allotment, holding that undisputed documentary evidence negated the prosecution case and no prima facie case was made out.
Ajay Kumar Sharma v. Rajesh Kumar Sharma
The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the trial court's order closing the petitioner's evidence after multiple adjournments were granted but not utilized.
Rajwati v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions based on a reliable dying declaration and corroborative evidence, dismissing the appellants' claims of alibi and flawed investigation in a dowry harassment and murder case.
Modern Credit Private Limited v. Micra Soft Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a demerger scheme under the Companies Act, 1956, holding that RBI approval was not required as the first motion predated the RBI circular and the scheme complied with statutory requirements including Income Tax Act conditions.
Silverglades Developers Private Limited & Ors. v. Official Liquidator
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Amalgamation under the Companies Act, 1956 after addressing regulatory and tax concerns, condoning delay and directing compliance with statutory requirements.
Ranvir Singh Garg v. Ordinance Factories Officers C G H S Ltd & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award, holding that payment towards common stilt construction does not entitle a member to exclusive parking space in a cooperative housing society.
Mahesh Kumar v. Pritam Chand LRS
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of the tenant on the ground of bona fide necessity of the landlord for residential accommodation under the Delhi Rent Control Act, dismissing the tenant's leave to defend application.