Delhi High Court
92,849 judgments
Bodh Nath Mishra v. The Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking quashing of a 1997 dismissal order and reinstatement due to inordinate delay, laches, and suppression of material facts by the petitioner.
Amarjeet Malik v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that the Staff Selection Commission cannot introduce new interview cut off marks after the recruitment advertisement, and directed selection based on aggregate marks without such cut offs.
Rakesh Kumar & Anr. v. The Chairman, Staff Selection Commission & Ors.
The provided text does not contain substantive judgment details to analyze.
Harish Kumar v. District and Sessions Judge, Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that imposing a major penalty without following the prescribed procedure under Rule 14 after initiating minor penalty proceedings under Rule 16 is illegal and set aside the removal order, substituting it with a minor penalty.
Jagdish Chander v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the treatment of the petitioner's suspension period as not spent on duty during a major penalty enquiry and dismissed the writ petition challenging the same.
Poonam Arora v. Surender Kapoor & Ors.
The court held that the plaintiff is the absolute owner of the suit property and that subsequent sale deeds based on invalid power of attorney are void, granting declaration and permanent injunction in favor of the plaintiff.
C.K.P Naidu v. Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that a retired Principal has no vested right to re-employment as Principal under the GNCTD scheme, and denial of such re-employment does not entitle arrears or benefits from the date of retirement.
Havildar Chand v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of the petitioner’s 1998 ACR and dismissed his challenge, affirming that mandatory service periods and signature presence requirements under Army rules were satisfied.
Bhupender Kaur & Ors. v. Gurdarshan Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by upholding income assessment, applying a 30% future prospects increase, and awarding higher amounts for non-pecuniary damages and loss of estate.
SWAROVSKI AG & ANR v. ROYAL IMAGES CATALOGUE COMPANY PVT. LTD. & ORS
The Delhi High Court decreed the suit for trademark infringement in favor of Swarovski, recording a settlement with some defendants and granting ex-parte relief against the remaining defendant.
Surjeet Singh & Ors. v. Jet Air India Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging an industrial award as withdrawn, granting liberty to the petitioners to approach the Industrial Tribunal afresh regarding alleged coercion in VRS acceptance.
Gajinder Pal Singh & Anr. v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for dowry death and cruelty under Sections 304-B and 498-A IPC, acquitting two accused for lack of evidence, and affirmed the mandatory minimum sentence of seven years imprisonment.
P K Tewari v. CBI
The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail applications of petitioners accused of serious bank loan fraud involving fictitious invoices and diversion of funds, emphasizing the gravity of allegations over cooperation and medical grounds.
P K Tewari v. CBI
The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail applications of petitioners accused of serious financial fraud involving fictitious companies and diversion of bank loans, emphasizing the gravity of allegations over cooperation or health grounds.
C.K.P Naidu v. Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that a retired Principal has no vested right to re-employment as Principal under the GNCTD scheme, set aside the Tribunal's order granting such re-employment, and denied arrears for the period prior to rejoining.
State v. Surender @ Sonu Punjabi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and death sentence of appellants for murder based on credible eyewitness and medical evidence, affirming the law on cross-examination of own witnesses and the Court's role in assessing sufficiency of injuries to cause death.
Sanjay Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court modified a murder conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to murder, holding that the acid attack was committed in the heat of passion without premeditation, and sentenced the appellant to eight years imprisonment with benefit of custody period.
Fiazal Khan v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for murder based on credible eyewitness testimony and medical evidence, dismissing the appeal despite the appellant's non-compliance with bail conditions.
State v. Surender @ Sonu Punjabi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court confirmed the murder convictions and death sentence of appellants based on credible eyewitness and medical evidence, clarifying the law on cross-examination of own witnesses under Section 154 of the Evidence Act.
Amit Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed Amit Kumar's appeal, upholding his conviction and life sentence for the murder of his wife by firearm based on conclusive medical, forensic, and circumstantial evidence.