Delhi High Court

92,849 judgments

Year:

CPL B S Siddha v. Union of India & Ors.

18 Sep 2014 · Kailash Gambhir; Najmi Waziri · 2014:DHC:4824-DB

The Delhi High Court held that an Air Force personnel who completes seven years of service before joining a civil post is entitled to discharge and appointment despite applying earlier, treating procedural lapses as technical irregularities.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Air Force discharge Seven years service eligibility Civil post application No Objection Certificate

TIRATH RAM SHAH HOSPITAL v. PRADEEP KUMAR AND ORS.

18 Sep 2014 · SURESH KAIT · 2014:DHC:4802

The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition as settled after the petitioner hospital agreed to pay Rs. 2,00,000 each to the respondents/workmen as full and final settlement of their claims.

labor petition_allowed writ petition settlement workmen claims Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Cholamandalam MS General Ins Co Ltd v. Gajender Singh Pal & Ors.

18 Sep 2014 · Jayant Nath · 2014:DHC:4823

The Delhi High Court upheld the compensation award in a motor accident claim, ruling that the insurer cannot avoid liability due to the driver’s fake license absent negligence by the insured and affirmed the 50% addition for future prospects in loss of dependency.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 loss of dependency future prospects fake driving license

G.S.BHANDARI v. NIRMAL SINGH & ORS

18 Sep 2014 · JAYANT NATH · 2014:DHC:4822

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for an Army officer's permanent disability and loss of future promotion prospects caused by a motor vehicle accident, recognizing loss of career advancement as a compensable injury under the Motor Vehicles Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 compensation permanent disability loss of promotion

Giri Raj v. Land & Building Department

18 Sep 2014 · The Chief Justice; Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2014:DHC:4794-DB

The Delhi High Court heard LPA No. 444/2013 involving Giri Raj and the Land & Building Department, referencing a related case but providing no detailed judgment in the available text.

property other Land & Building Department property dispute Delhi High Court LPA No. 444/2013

Mala Devi v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

18 Sep 2014 · Vibhu Bakhru, J · 2014:DHC:4792

The Delhi High Court held that failure of sterilization does not establish medical negligence absent breach of duty, and dismissed the petitioner’s claim for compensation beyond the Family Planning Insurance Scheme.

medical negligence / civil liability petition_dismissed Significant medical negligence sterilization failure Bolam test consent form

Bernstein Litowitz Berger and Grossmann LLP v. Union of India

18 Sep 2014 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Siddharth Mridul · 2014:DHC:4820-DB

Delhi High Court set aside the Authority for Advance Rulings' taxability decision on settlement funds, remanding for fresh consideration of whether the receipts are capital or revenue in nature under the Income-tax Act, 1961.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income-tax Act 1961 Section 195 Advance Ruling Capital receipts

Arvind @ Pintu & Ors. v. State

18 Sep 2014 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2014:DHC:4813-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of appellants for murder under Sections 302/34 IPC based on credible eyewitness and forensic evidence despite minor omissions in witness conduct.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 302 IPC murder eyewitness testimony forensic evidence

Savitri Seth and Ors. v. Parshottam Dass

18 Sep 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:4814

The Delhi High Court held that bonafide necessity for eviction under Section 14(1)(e) must be assessed as on the date of filing the petition, refused to consider subsequent events after long pendency, and allowed eviction of the tenant from part of the premises.

property appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) bonafide necessity eviction petition

Director of Income Tax (Intl. Tax.)-II v. Panalfa Autoelektrik Ltd.

18 Sep 2014 · Sanjiv Khanna; V. Kameswar Rao · 2014 DHC 4799

The Delhi High Court held that commission paid to a non-resident commission agent for procuring export orders does not constitute fee for technical services under Section 9(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, dismissing the Revenue's appeal.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant fee for technical services Section 9(1)(vii) Income Tax Act commission agent non-resident income

Kanta Aggarwal & Anr. v. Kalpana Aggarwal & Anr.

18 Sep 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:4810

The Delhi High Court upheld the use of part of a matrimonial residence as a clinic incidental to residential use under the Master Plan of Delhi, dismissing the petitioners' challenge under Article 227.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Article 227 Constitution of India Master Plan of Delhi residential premises incidental professional use

Dharam Singh v. Mahinder Singh & Ors.

18 Sep 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:4809

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking to lead further evidence after a 20-year delay, holding that legal heirs cannot seek reopening of evidence on grounds not raised by the original plaintiff during his lifetime.

civil petition_dismissed Article 227 Constitution of India Order XVIII Rule 2 CPC legal heirs cross-examination

VIJAYA BANK v. GOVT. OF NCT, DELHI

18 Sep 2014 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2014:DHC:4811

The Delhi High Court directed an inquiry into alleged forgery of hypothecation documents and permitted the bank to repossess and sell the vehicle under safeguards, leaving factual disputes open for trial.

civil other Significant hypothecation vehicle registration forgery Section 199 IPC

Rajesh Kumar v. High Court of Delhi

18 Sep 2014 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Vipin Sanghi · 2014:DHC:4801-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing correction of discriminatory evaluation in a competitive exam and ordered the petitioner’s appointment as Administrative Officer (Judicial).

administrative appeal_allowed Significant evaluation of answer sheets discrimination in examination Article 226 writ petition

M/S. ROXY DRYCLEANERS v. SAMEER WASON & ANR.

17 Sep 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:4783

The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of a tenant on grounds of bonafide necessity, rejecting non-joinder and subsequent possession defenses under the Delhi Rent Control Act.

property appeal_dismissed Significant bonafide necessity eviction Delhi Rent Control Act non-joinder of parties tenancy rights

Dr. Ramesh Gupta v. M/S. SAJ PROPERTY PVT. LTD. & ORS.

17 Sep 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:4774

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order setting aside interim possession based on unregistered documents and allowed impleadment of a third party whose rights were affected, dismissing the petition under Article 227.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Section 53A Transfer of Property Act Order I Rule 10 CPC interim order unregistered agreement to sell

Ambreesh Kumar v. State & Anr.

17 Sep 2014 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2014:DHC:4773

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under the SC/ST Act based on a genuine settlement between government employee parties, applying the inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR SC/ST Act settlement

State v. Surender @ Sonu Punjabi & Ors.

17 Sep 2014 · S. Muralidhar; Mukta Gupta · 2014:DHC:4750-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the murder convictions and confirmed the death sentence of appellants Sunil and Sudhir, affirming that the prosecution proved the case beyond reasonable doubt despite hostile witnesses and procedural challenges.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant murder death sentence common intention ocular evidence

Raj Pal v. Lt. Governor and Ors

17 Sep 2014 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Siddharth Mridul · 2014:DHC:4791-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition under the 1894 Act lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act where possession was not taken within five years of the award.

property petition_allowed Significant Section 24(2) RTFCTLARR Act 2013 Land Acquisition Act 1894 lapse of acquisition physical possession

Ex. Constable Manik Lal Singh v. The Union of India & Anr.

17 Sep 2014 · Kailash Gambhir; Najmi Waziri · 2014:DHC:4787-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging denial of ACP/MACP benefits and promotion due to the petitioner’s adverse disciplinary record and upheld the Screening Committees’ decisions.

administrative petition_dismissed Assured Career Progression Scheme Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme financial upgradation disciplinary punishments