Delhi High Court
92,849 judgments
Commissioner of Income Tax-VI v. M/S. T.S.Kishan & Co. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court allowed the Revenue's appeal, restoring the addition of Rs. 28,00,000/- under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, holding that the assessee failed to prove the identity, genuineness, and creditworthiness of unsecured loans.
Commissioner of Customs v. M/S. Dejero Logix Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Customs Commissioner's appeal, holding that the imported equipment was for private transmission and not a restricted TV broadcast transmitter requiring a license.
Arvind Kumar v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act on the ground of amicable settlement between parties, applying inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
R.S SOLUTIONS v. DAN BLOCKS BRAKES INDIA PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendant's application for leave to defend in a summary suit for recovery of dues, holding that the defence of overcharging and substandard goods was sham and unsubstantiated.
Akansha Enterprises v. Additional Secretary & D.G CGHS
The Delhi High Court decreed the plaintiff's suit for unpaid medicine bills due to the defendant's failure to file a written statement within time without extension, applying Order VIII Rule 10 CPC and Supreme Court precedent on strict timelines.
Palm Greens Infrastructures Private Limited v. Regional Director
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between multiple private limited companies under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, after finding no objections and compliance with statutory requirements.
Selina Exim Pvt Ltd v. Ecodel Projects Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the amended Scheme of Amalgamation between Selina Exim Pvt Ltd and Ecodel Projects Pvt Ltd under sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956 after addressing regulatory objections and obtaining necessary consents.
M/S Stericat Gutstrings Private Limited v. GBK Business Venture Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed a Scheme of Arrangement under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with the requirement of convening meetings of shareholders and creditors based on their written consents.
One Star Realty Private Limited v. E2E Solutions Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the first motion application under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with the requirement of convening meetings of stakeholders for a Scheme of Amalgamation based on majority written consents, subject to procedural safeguards.
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. v. Registrar, Trade Unions Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The High Court held that challenges to elections conducted during the pendency of a suit must be pursued through independent proceedings and cannot be raised within the original suit if unrelated.
Sonu v. State (GNCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions under Sections 304 Part II and 325 IPC based on a valid dying declaration without medical certification and corroborated eyewitness and medical evidence, while modifying sentences for two appellants.
Kailash Chand Gupta v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years, regardless of physical possession.
Kartar Singh v. Union of India and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession and compensation are not completed within five years of the award, granting the petitioner a declaration of lapse.
New India Assurance Co Ltd v. Ved Pal Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld a motor accident compensation award, rejecting contributory negligence and holding that widow's remarriage does not bar her entitlement to compensation.
Joint Commissioner of Police v. Nawal Kishore
The High Court held that the disciplinary authority has the power to independently assess enquiry findings and proceed with departmental action despite criminal acquittal under specified exceptions, setting aside the CAT's quashing of dismissal.
Ashish Deep Verma v. New Delhi Municipal Council
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's dismissal of a petition challenging non-promotion, ruling that seniority-based selection respecting reservation policies was neither arbitrary nor discriminatory.
Shyam Sunder & Anr. v. Rakavi Hospitality & Ors.
The Delhi High Court decreed possession and recovery of rent against tenants who defaulted and failed to comply with court orders, striking off their defence for non-compliance.
M/S RAJAT LEASINGH LTD v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is not paid within five years of the award, regardless of physical possession.
Haji Construction Co. v. Govt. of National Capital Territory of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession and compensation are not completed within five years of the award.
Arun Mehra v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse if compensation remains unpaid for over five years as per Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, granting the petitioner relief accordingly.