Delhi High Court
92,849 judgments
M/S. Shamken Multifab Ltd. v. Satyam Packers
The High Court set aside an ex parte decree after finding that the defendant had filed appearance which was not recorded due to court staff negligence, allowing the suit to proceed.
Hemdendra Agarwal & Anr. v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under multiple IPC sections on the ground of a settlement between parties, applying its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. in a non-compoundable offence case.
Planet M Retail Ltd v. Select Infrastructure Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that a determinable licence agreement validly terminated cannot be reinstated by interim injunction under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act, and disputes over breach and termination must be resolved by arbitration.
Mohd Firoz v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 406, 498-A, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement between the parties under its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
M/S Dunlop India Limited & Anr. v. Dr. Kamal Mitra Chenoy & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the joinder of two related causes of action and parties in one suit arising from the same transaction, dismissing the appellant's challenge to the suit's maintainability and valuation.
Sandeep Kumar v. State
The High Court of Delhi delivered judgment on a bail application filed by Sandeep Kumar in a criminal matter on 19.09.2014.
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited v. Ram Lal Saroj & Ors.
The Delhi High Court reduced compensation for loss of earning capacity in a motor accident claim involving a government employee continuing to draw salary post-injury, while enhancing other heads of damages, allowing the insurer's appeal partly.
Rajesh Mittal v. Sumer Chand & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging trial court orders allowing amendment of plaint and rejecting objection to amended plaint, holding that amendment allows case to be put forth for trial and a party cannot challenge two distinct orders in one petition.
Virender Singh v. Land & Building Department
The Delhi High Court directed the Land & Building Department to decide petitioners' applications for allotment of alternative plots strictly by seniority and policy within fixed procedural timelines, disallowing out-of-turn allotments.
Union of India & Ors. v. Aurangzeb Choudhary & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the refund of excess lease money collected by Railways beyond the prescribed enhancement, emphasizing enforcement of final judgments and prevention of unjust enrichment by State entities.
Kishor Kumar v. Manoj Kumar
The Delhi High Court decreed recovery of Rs. 35,83,704 with interest in favor of the plaintiff for breach of loan agreement involving sale of property without consent.
Commissioner of Income Tax-III v. M/S. SPICE DISTRIBUTION LTD.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision that advertisement expenses are revenue expenditures deductible in the year incurred and dismissed the revenue's appeal seeking disallowance and penalty.
Inder Prakash Kohli v. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence
Bail was denied to the mastermind of a gold smuggling operation due to his attempt to flee, incomplete investigation, and serious nature of the offence under the Customs Act.
MS. CHANDER MUKHI & ORS. v. SH. PARVEEN GOSWAMI
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order on grounds of bonafide necessity, rejecting tenants' claim of ownership by adverse possession due to lack of hostile possession and affirming landlord's title.
MS. REKHA RANI @ REKHA v. SH. ADITYA SARAF
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction on bonafide necessity grounds, emphasizing strict adherence to the 15-day period for filing leave to defend applications and confirming landlord ownership based on title documents.
Rajiv Chanana v. Dy. Director, Directorate of Enforcement
Attachment of property under the PMLA must be vacated upon acquittal of the accused in the scheduled offence forming the basis of such attachment.
Satbir Singh v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal proceeding under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes on the basis of an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, applying its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Rakesh Kumar Sharma & Sons (HUF) v. BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd. & Anr.
Delhi High Court allowed electricity disconnection at premises occupied by a person liable for dues to compel payment, emphasizing courts must prevent abuse of process even within limited review jurisdiction.
Sanjeev Kumar @ Rajeev & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 406/498-A/34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes on the ground of an amicable settlement between the parties, applying its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Golden Strand Pvt Ltd v. Timeless Fashions Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between three companies under the Companies Act, 1956, affirming the validity of the appointed date and addressing statutory concerns without requiring its alteration.