Delhi High Court
36,666 judgments
Ramesh Kumar Jangir v. Commissioner of Customs
The Delhi High Court directed release of a gold chain as personal effect without customs duty and ordered the Customs Department to pass a timely order on other seized gold items declared at the red channel.
Sajad Ahmed Kak v. Commissioner of Customs New Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the Customs Department to pass a refund order for gold disposed of without intimation after redemption option was exercised, emphasizing adherence to appellate directions and principles of natural justice.
Retired Officers Welfare Society v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that IOCL's retrospective freezing of pension benefits under the Superannuation Benefits Fund Scheme violated employees' vested rights and Article 14, directing restoration of original pension entitlements.
Staff Selection Commission & Anr. v. Bhavna
The court upheld the Tribunal's order directing a fresh medical examination since the medical boards failed to opine whether the candidate's physical defect would interfere with duty performance, dismissing the petition challenging this despite delay.
ICICI Bank Ltd. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings against ICICI Bank and others, holding that the dispute was civil in nature and did not disclose offences under Sections 420, 120B, and 34 IPC.
Jyoti Wazir & Ors. v. Deepak Khosla & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that no additional issues need be framed post amended plaint where parties led evidence fully aware of the case, rejecting defendants' belated plea for new issues and documents.
Anuj Suhag v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court quashed illegal Kalandra proceedings and detention under Sections 107/151 CrPC for lack of preliminary inquiry and violation of natural justice, directing departmental action against police officials.
Sushil Yadav v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a murder case due to lack of prima facie evidence implicating him and absence of motive, despite the serious nature of the offence.
Abhishek Kumar v. State NCT of Delhi
Anticipatory bail granted to accused husband in dowry and miscarriage allegations due to lack of reliable evidence and no custodial interrogation requirement.
Shazia Ilmi v. Rajdeep Sardesai & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that unauthorized recording and publication of private video footage without consent violates the right to privacy and restrained defamatory statements in an interim injunction against media defendants.
IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD v. SUNITA & ORS
The Delhi High Court upheld a motor accident compensation award relying on income tax returns to determine the deceased's income and dismissed the insurer's appeal challenging inclusion of alleged rental income.
Manisha Dhawan v. Mohammad Ali
The Delhi High Court allowed summary eviction based on admitted landlord-tenant relationship and termination of tenancy, while permitting trial on disputed construction expense claims.
Arvind Singla v. M/s Beetel Teletech Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash proceedings under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the NI Act, holding that the petitioner failed to prove non-involvement and must face trial for cheque dishonour liability.
State (NCT of Delhi) v. Akib
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal upholding the acquittal of the accused in a sexual offence case due to inconsistencies in the prosecutrix's testimony and failure to prove charges beyond reasonable doubt.
Aasheesh Kumar Paandey v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash FIR No.140/2021, holding that the FIR was not manifestly frivolous or motivated by mala fide, and the matter requires trial to determine the truth.
T.V. Krishnan & Ors. v. M/S All Bank Finance Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that employees of a wholly owned subsidiary of a public sector bank are entitled to salary revisions granted to the parent bank, and writ jurisdiction is maintainable against the successor bank post-amalgamation.
SEITZ GMBH v. SIMRAN TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court held that the time spent prosecuting bona fide and diligent insolvency proceedings before the NCLT and NCLAT is excluded from limitation under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963, allowing the plaintiff's suit to be held within time.
FIITJEE LTD. v. STATE & ORS.
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a petition seeking police investigation under Section 156(3) CrPC in a dispute involving alleged cheating, holding that no prima facie cognizable offence was made out and police intervention was not necessary as the petitioner possessed relevant evidence.
Amanpreet Singh Malhotra v. Gagandeep Kaur Malhotra
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal challenging the Family Court's order directing him to pay school fees and maintenance for his twin daughters, affirming the equitable apportionment of expenses based on the parties' circumstances.
Sachin Gaur v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the permissibility of recording examination-in-chief by affidavit in domestic violence proceedings under the DV Act, dismissing the petition challenging the Metropolitan Magistrate's order allowing such evidence.