Delhi High Court

36,666 judgments

Year:

Rajesh Kumar v. Special CP, Traffic Management Division and Ors

03 Apr 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:2320-DB

The Delhi High Court granted a physically disabled vendor exemption from moving his vending cart every thirty minutes by directing allocation of a fixed vending space near Kashmere Gate Metro Station, balancing disability rights with public convenience.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Certificate of Vending physical disability mobile vendor Article 226

Azmalsadat Mousavi Nodoushan v. The Union of India & Ors.

03 Apr 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:2315-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed a writ petition directing Customs to appraise and release detained personal gold bangles of a foreign national without storage charges, emphasizing procedural fairness under the Baggage Rules, 2016.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Article 226 Constitution of India Baggage Rules 2016 Customs detention Personal effects

Anil Kumar Aggarwal v. Usha Garg & Anr.

03 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2342

The Delhi High Court allowed a petition condoning a minor delay in filing the written statement and directed the trial court to take it on record to ensure fair trial and expeditious disposal.

civil appeal_allowed written statement delay in filing condonation of delay trial court discretion

Farooq Alam Baig v. Vania Mirza @ Priya Kumari

03 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2341

The High Court held that restoration of a dismissed guardianship petition cannot be conditioned on acquittal in a criminal case and restored the petition for adjudication on merits.

family appeal_allowed Significant guardianship petition restoration application dismissal-in-default criminal case condition

Sh. Toni v. Smt. Kajal

03 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2340

The High Court set aside the dismissal of a suit filed on behalf of a mentally unsound person, directing the Trial Court to conduct a comprehensive enquiry under Order XXXII CPC before deciding on the suit's maintainability.

civil remanded Significant Order XXXII CPC unsound mind appointment of guardian suit maintainability

Sunil Kumar Paul v. Chanderbhan Kalra

03 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2339

The High Court allowed a one-time opportunity for examination of a witness missed due to bona fide misunderstanding, imposing costs to prevent delay in a possession suit.

civil appeal_allowed examination of witnesses trial procedure cross-examination delay in trial

Charanjeet Singh v. Municipal Corporation Delhi

03 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2338

The High Court held that a Trial Court must hear the affected party before vacating an interim order and directed expeditious adjudication of the pending application, without deciding on the substantive ownership dispute.

civil appeal_allowed Procedural interim order status quo Order I Rule 10 CPC Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC

Bharti Axa General Insurance Co Ltd v. Smt Irabati & Ors.

03 Apr 2025 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:2267

The Delhi High Court held that an insurer who has accepted additional premium under the Employee’s Compensation Act is liable to pay compensation and penalty regardless of the deceased driver’s license status, dismissing the insurer’s appeal seeking recovery rights against the insured.

insurance appeal_dismissed Significant Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923 insurance liability motor accident compensation driving license validity

M/S NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD v. MOHAMMAD ARIF & ANR.

03 Apr 2025 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:2280
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld compensation and penalty awarded under the Employee’s Compensation Act against an insurer liable due to additional premium paid, dismissing the insurer’s appeal challenging limitation, intimation, and penalty liability.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923 Section 4A(3)(b) limitation insurance liability

Ashish Bathla v. Shikha Bathla

03 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2334

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking special visitation for a child's birthday, upholding the Family Court's extension of existing visitation and directing expeditious disposal of the Guardianship Petition.

family petition_dismissed Guardianship Petition Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 visitation rights special visitation

Smt. Manju & Ors. v. Mahesh Kumar (Driver) & Anr.

03 Apr 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:2306

The Delhi High Court upheld a lawful settlement in a motor accident claim case, setting aside the tribunal's order restraining withdrawal of funds and directing compliance with settlement terms including fixed deposit creation for a minor.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Settlement Agreement Article 227 Constitution of India Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Bank account withdrawal

Ashwani Kumar @ Ashu v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

03 Apr 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:2270

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in an NDPS case involving commercial quantity of Alprazolam due to procedural lapses and weak prosecution evidence, emphasizing protection of liberty at the bail stage.

criminal bail_granted Significant bail NDPS Act Alprazolam commercial quantity

Mayank Pandey v. State (NCT of Delhi)

03 Apr 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:2269

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the accused in a case involving alleged forgery and cheating, holding that cooperation with investigation and absence of custodial interrogation justified bail.

criminal appeal_allowed anticipatory bail Section 420 IPC Section 468 IPC Section 471 IPC

Ajay Gautam v. Union of India

03 Apr 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:2293
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court allowed amendment of a writ petition challenging prolonged police enquiry under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. to seek specific relief and compensation, but rejected prayers for strictures against police and magistrate.

criminal appeal_allowed Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Section 482 Cr.P.C. Article 14 Constitution Article 21 Constitution

A. K. Jain v. The Oriential Insurance Company Ltd

03 Apr 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:2361

The Delhi High Court set aside disciplinary penalties imposed on an insurance employee for processing a Workmen’s Compensation claim based on a statutory award, emphasizing the need for reasoned enquiry and adherence to natural justice.

administrative petition_allowed Significant disciplinary proceedings statutory award Workmen’s Compensation natural justice

Sandeep Kumar Bhatt v. Insolvency & Bankruptcy Board of India & Ors.

03 Apr 2025 · Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya, CJ; Tushar Rao Gedela, J · 2025:DHC:2252-DB

The Delhi High Court reduced a two-year suspension of an Insolvency Professional imposed by IBBI to the period already served, holding that the penalty was disproportionate and the disciplinary authority erred in factual findings.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Insolvency Professional Disciplinary Committee Suspension

Mohd Azim Nadaf v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

03 Apr 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:2274

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a murder case based on circumstantial evidence due to insufficient direct evidence and ongoing trial delays.

criminal appeal_allowed bail circumstantial evidence Section 302 IPC conspiracy

Gurmeet Singh v. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd

03 Apr 2025 · The Chief Justice; Tushar Rao Gedela; Devendra Kumar Upadhya... · 2025:DHC:2256-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of a non-licensee shopkeeper seeking allotment of an alternate shop under the MRTS Rehabilitation Policy, holding that promissory estoppel and legitimate expectation do not apply without a clear legal right.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Relocation and Rehabilitation Policy Project Affected Persons Delhi MRTS Project promissory estoppel

EXSI/GD DALEL SINGH v. UNION OF INDIA

03 Apr 2025 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:2255-DB

The Delhi High Court held that dismissal forfeits pension but not gratuity or leave encashment, ordered refund of subsistence allowance recovered without authority, and directed reconsideration of compassionate allowance claim on merits.

service_law petition_allowed Significant Compassionate Allowance Gratuity Leave Encashment Subsistence Allowance

S. Sunil Kumar v. Union of India

03 Apr 2025 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:2263-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the disciplinary penalty against a CRPF officer for processing a payment without a work completion certificate, affirming limited judicial interference in departmental inquiries absent jurisdictional errors or no evidence.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disciplinary proceedings work completion certificate misconduct Central Civil Services Rules