Delhi High Court
93,075 judgments
Through: Mr. Ravi Varma and Ms. Satakshi Sood, Advocates v. ANGLE INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD
The Delhi High Court held that a settlement agreement under the Arbitration Act has the status of an arbitral award but execution involving immovable property must be pursued in the court having jurisdiction over the property's location.
OM FINCAP PVT. LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III, & ORS
The Delhi High Court quashed search operations and subsequent orders against petitioners conducted due to mistaken identity under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
OM FINCAP PVT. LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III, & ORS
The Delhi High Court quashed search operations and subsequent actions conducted on the petitioners due to mistaken identity in the warrant of authorization under the Income Tax Act, 1961.
OM FINCAP PVT. LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III, & ORS
The Delhi High Court quashed search operations and subsequent orders conducted on the petitioners due to mistaken identity in the warrant issued under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
33e0990d0f2d42f25abd80dc4c5f25a9dcaa16e7a3c4915637042d3180450312
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between two companies under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 after due compliance and no objections from statutory authorities.
2f8b93e47c3ad7f9bc15202248fa7db6776dc3e628241ece27bb1d01371b9c32
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Amalgamation under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with meetings of shareholders and creditors due to unanimous consent and absence of creditors.
Mr Aquib Ali & Mr Abhishek Bhardwaj, Advs. v. EARTHTECH ENTERPRISES LTD .....
The Delhi High Court allowed a petition under Section 27 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act to summon a retired witness for cross-examination in arbitration proceedings upon the arbitrator's approval and without objection from the respondent.
Judgment pronounced on November 14, 2014 M/S MAJA HEALTH CARE DIVISION ..... Plaintiff v. M/S TRANCE INTERNATIONAL & ANR ..... Defendants
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction to the plaintiff against defendants' use of deceptively similar 'COBRA' marks, affirming prior user rights and rejecting defendants' claims of honest concurrent use and delay defenses.
Mr. Manish K. Mishra, Adv v. M/S ALKA AYURVEDIC PVT. LTD. .... Defendant
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff's amendment application to clarify trademark registration issues in a passing off suit, holding that replication is part of pleadings and trial commences only with examination of witnesses.
Judgment pronounced on 14.11.2014 EDUCARE LIMITED & ANR ..... Plaintiffs v. S.K. SACHDEV & ANR ..... Defendants
The court held that while the plaintiffs have prior use and goodwill in the mark "THE SHRI RAM SCHOOL," the defendants' use of "ShreeRam World School" in a crowded field of similar marks is not wholly impermissible, but directed a disclaimer to avoid confusion.
Through: Mr. Sunil Chauhan, Advocate v. SHRI ATTAR SINGH (SINCE DECEASED) THOUGH LRS SMT. JASWANTI DEVI & ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals holding that appellants failed to prove possession of land prior to the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 and thus were not entitled to protection under Section 8 of the Act.
S.P. SINGLA CONSTRUCTIONS PVT LTD ..... Petitioner v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI .....
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the appointment of arbitrators, holding that the arbitrators complied with disclosure requirements and that court intervention before the arbitral award is premature under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Through: Mr.P.K. Dubey, Advocate v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
The Delhi High Court directed concurrent running of sentences imposed in two separate criminal cases, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C., emphasizing the court's discretion in ordering concurrency under Section 427 Cr.P.C.
Through: Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma, Adv v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
The Delhi High Court exercised its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to direct that sentences in two separate convictions run concurrently, considering the petitioner’s prolonged custody and relevant legal provisions.
Mr.Rajesh Gupta with Mr.Harpreet Singh, Advocates. v. SH. ASHOK KUMAR ......
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's petition under Article 227 challenging eviction for failure to repair premises within prescribed time, affirming that extension of time must be sought promptly and concurrent eviction orders cannot be re-opened absent exceptional circumstances.
Through: Mr. Jogy Scaria, Adv v. SANGHAMITRA ( CGHS) SOCIETY AND ORS
The Delhi High Court held that jurisdiction for grant of succession certificate lies where the deceased was ordinarily resident at the time of death, not where the death occurred, and set aside the trial court's order returning the petition for lack of jurisdiction.
Mr. D.K.Rustogi, Mr. B.S.Bagga and Mr. Ishaan Saraswat, Advocates. v. MUKESH GUPTA ......
The Delhi High Court upheld a bonafide necessity eviction under the Delhi Rent Control Act, confirming landlord ownership and rejecting tenant's challenge to title and alternative accommodation claims.
Through: Mr. Sunil Chauhan, Advocate v. SHRI ATTAR SINGH (SINCE DECEASED) THOUGH LRS SMT. JASWANTI DEVI & ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals holding that appellants failed to prove possession prior to the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 and thus are not entitled to protection under Section 8 of the Act.
Gulati, Advs v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR
The Delhi High Court directed the Revenue Assistant to adjudicate land misuse allegations against Sanraj Farms in accordance with law and government guidelines, requiring the Gaon Sabha to prove its claims.
RASHEED MASOOD ..... Through Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Asgar Khan and Mr. Rajiv Saxena, Advocates v. CBI .....
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's bail application during appeal, holding that serious corruption charges outweigh medical grounds for suspension of sentence.