Delhi High Court
93,075 judgments
Mr.Ramesh Kumar, Advocate v. NORTH DELHI POWER LTD. .....
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal permitting amendment of the plaint to include declaratory relief, emphasizing that substantial justice must prevail over technical objections.
LUFTHANSA GERMAN AIRLINES v. CORAM:
The Delhi High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal's award holding that employees designated as supervisors but lacking disciplinary authority are workmen under the Industrial Disputes Act, and their termination without statutory retrenchment compliance was illegal.
delivered on: November 17, 2014 W.P.(C) No.4387/2013 v. LUFTHANSA GERMAN AIRLINES
The Delhi High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal's discretionary award of compensation instead of reinstatement with back wages to terminated employees, emphasizing that reinstatement is not an automatic right even if termination is illegal.
M/S ESS CEE CEE & ASSOCIATES (INDIA) PVT LTD v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging an order under a lease deed, holding that the dispute must be resolved through arbitration by the successor authority as per the contract.
COL. T. P. SHARMA v. RAM DAYAL SAGAR
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Labour Court award in favor of the workman, holding that unrebutted evidence and failure to prove settlement or fraud justified upholding the award.
Sh. U. Srivastava, Advocate. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....
The Delhi High Court held that a fixed tenure deputation appointment as Director of NIFT does not entitle the incumbent to automatic reappointment or extension, and the appointing authority is not obligated to consider the incumbent's application after tenure expiry.
Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vaibhav Kalra, Advocate v. M/S CIMMCO LIMITED
The Delhi High Court dismissed MTNL's appeal rejecting its claim of TDS deduction in the absence of evidence of actual deposit and issuance of a TDS certificate in execution proceedings arising from an arbitration award.
CRL.A. 1013/2014 v. STATE
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentences of Dharambir Sharma and Rakesh Sharma for murder and attempt to murder, rejecting their alibi and false implication claims based on consistent eyewitness and forensic evidence.
Mr. Aviral Dhirendra, Advocate v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....
The Delhi High Court quashed SSC's cancellation and debarment orders for failure to disclose specific evidence in the show cause notice, emphasizing the necessity of adequate particulars to ensure fair hearing under natural justice.
HEIRS MRS JAI RANI GUPTA v. For the
The Delhi High Court upheld the Competent Authority's order permitting eviction proceedings under Section 19 of the Slum Areas Act, ruling that res judicata did not bar the petition and that the respondent was entitled to maintain the eviction application.
Mr. O.P. Agarwal, Mr. Jeet Ram, Advocates v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....
The Delhi High Court held that a provisional certificate issued before the eligibility cut-off date establishes qualification despite subsequent mark sheet revisions, directing appointment of the petitioner as Assistant Sub Inspector.
Mr. Ramesh Gupta, senior advocate with Mr. Manav Gupta, Advs. v. CBI.....
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of an empanelled valuer for submitting a false valuation report facilitating fraudulent loans and dismissed his bail applications during appeal.
SHRI AITA RAM v. HINDUSTAN TIMES LTD
The Delhi High Court held that reinstatement with continuity of service after illegal termination ordinarily includes full back wages even if not expressly mentioned, setting aside the Executing Court's refusal to enforce back wages relief.
Through: Mr. Kamal Nijhawan with Mr. Sumit Gaur, Advs. with v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 482 CrPC on the basis of an amicable settlement and reconciliation between the parties.
Through: Mr. Avtar Singh & Ms. Richa Samhna, Advs v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 135 of the Electricity Act on the ground of settlement and non-interest of the complainant, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Shiv Kumar Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner’s pending representation against his transfer within two weeks and stayed the transfer order for one week thereafter to protect his rights.
Sanraj Farms Private Limited v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the Public Grievance Commission lacks jurisdiction to direct or supervise quasi-judicial proceedings under Section 133 Cr.P.C., and must refrain from interfering in sub-judice matters before the Revenue Assistant/SDM.
KULWANT KAUR ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Nalin Tripathi, Adv. v. AMRINDER KAUR & ANR .....
The Delhi High Court allowed the transfer and consolidation of two related civil suits to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and conflicting judgments under Section 24 CPC.
Tandon, Advs v. ELIXIR TRADING PVT LTD ..... Defendant
The Delhi High Court held that the defendant's use of the trademark 'DEWFLOW' is deceptively similar to the plaintiffs' 'DOWFLOW' and restrained disposal of seized goods under the similar mark, reinforcing principles of trademark infringement and passing off.
Through: Mr. Sanjay Goswami, Advocate v. AMIT KUMAR VERMA
The Delhi High Court held that a complainant can revive a Section 138 NI Act complaint after respondent's default in a settlement, directing deposit of paid amounts pending final adjudication to protect both parties' interests.