Delhi High Court
93,075 judgments
OM PRAKASH v. For the
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is not paid and possession not taken within five years, and mere deposit of compensation in court without tendering it to the landowner does not amount to payment.
Mr. Jatin Sehgal & Mr. Harish Malik, Advocates v. SMT MANISHA SWARUP .....
The Delhi High Court allowed the father's appeal, setting aside the grant of custody to the mother, holding that the children's intelligent preference to live with the father must be considered paramount in custody decisions.
Mr. Arvind K.Nigam, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhimanue Shrestha, Advocate v. LALIT NARAYAN .....
The Delhi High Court held that a foreign divorce decree based on irretrievable breakdown of marriage is not enforceable in India as it is not a recognized ground under Indian law, dismissing the petition to recognize such decree.
Mr.Mohit Gupta and Mr.Vishal Saxena, Advocates v. SUNITA SHARMA .....
The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant's divorce petition on the ground of mental cruelty caused by repeated false allegations of extra-marital affairs, setting aside the trial court's dismissal.
Ms. Rakhi Dubey, Advocate. v. STATE .....
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of rape charges based on scientific blood group evidence and absence of injuries, holding that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
BLE MR. JUSTICE v. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's decision that service charges reimbursed by a co-occupant do not form part of industrial undertaking profits for deduction under Section 80-I of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
PHIRE RAM v. CORAM:-
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act with an award older than five years and unpaid compensation are deemed lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.
Mr.Amit Sethi with Mr.Sachin Aneja, Advocates. v. SH. SWADESH KUMAR GUPTA ......
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of a tenant on the ground of the landlord's bona fide requirement of a garage for parking his son's car, recognizing parking space as a legitimate necessity under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Nooruddin v. State
The Delhi High Court reduced the appellants' murder conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under the sudden quarrel exception and modified their sentence to the period already served.
Nooruddin v. State
The Delhi High Court reduced the appellants' conviction from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part-I IPC, holding the killing occurred in a sudden quarrel and ordering their release after time served.
DSJ Communication Ltd. v. UOI
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the rejection of further extension of export obligation period under an EPCG licence, holding that the endorsement incorporated prior permissions and no prejudice arose from procedural defects.
Viacom 18 Media Private Ltd. & Anr. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld a ten-day transmission ban imposed on a TV channel for violating programme code norms, holding that penalties by the Inter-Ministerial Council without mandatory consultation with the Broadcasting Content Complaint Council are valid and proportionate.
Through Mr. CM Lall, Adv. with Anuj Nair, Adv v. CITICORP BUSINESS & FINANCE PVT. LTD. AND ANR. Defendants
Delhi High Court held that defendants' use of 'CITI' and 'CITICORP' marks as part of their corporate name and domain name infringed plaintiffs' well-known trademarks, and the Court has territorial jurisdiction to entertain the suit.
ROYAL SUNDERAM ALLIANCE INSURANCE..... Through Mr.Pankaj Seth, Advocate v. BHAWNA AGGARWAL & ORS .....
The Delhi High Court held that a claim under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act is not maintainable when the deceased was driving the vehicle as owner or authorized driver, relying on Supreme Court precedents.
NARESH TREHAN v. RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA
The Delhi High Court held that income tax returns and related assessment information are exempt from RTI disclosure absent demonstrable larger public interest, upholding privacy and confidentiality protections under the RTI and Income Tax Acts.
NARESH TREHAN v. RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA
The Delhi High Court held that income tax returns and related information are exempt from disclosure under the RTI Act unless larger public interest is demonstrated, setting aside the CIC's order directing disclosure.
NARESH TREHAN v. RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA
The Delhi High Court held that income tax returns are exempt from disclosure under the RTI Act as personal information unless larger public interest justifies disclosure, setting aside the CIC's order directing disclosure.
NARESH TREHAN v. RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA
The Delhi High Court held that income tax returns and related information are exempt from disclosure under the RTI Act and Income Tax Act unless larger public interest is demonstrated, setting aside the CIC's order directing disclosure.
Mr. Tarun Rana, Advocate v. AMIT BABBAR .....
The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal upholding the lower courts' decree based on a bill bearing the defendant's employee's initials, holding that the onus shifted to the defendant to disprove receipt and authenticity.
CRL.A. 1537/2011 v. STATE
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of kidnapping and murder charges due to failure of the prosecution to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, emphasizing the importance of reliable last seen evidence and valid discovery statements.