Delhi High Court
93,075 judgments
NARESH TREHAN v. RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA
The Delhi High Court held that income tax returns are exempt from disclosure under the RTI Act as personal information unless larger public interest justifies disclosure, and set aside the CIC's order directing their disclosure.
GOVERNMENT OF THE NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI v. v.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award awarding compensation for delay and consequential losses in a construction contract dispute, limiting court interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act and modifying future interest rate from 12% to 6% per annum.
Seth & Ms.Amisha Gupta, Advs v. SMT SHAKUN JAISWAL & ORS ..... Defendants
The Delhi High Court allowed simultaneous recording of the plaintiff's evidence in separate suits involving common witnesses to save time and cost without consolidating the suits.
NARESH TREHAN v. RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA
The Delhi High Court held that income tax returns and related information are exempt from disclosure under the RTI Act unless larger public interest is demonstrated, setting aside the CIC's order directing disclosure.
In CS(OS) 378/2011 DR. (PROF.) ASHOK KUMAR KESHARI ..... Plaintiff v. CORAM:
The Delhi High Court held that a defamation suit based on fresh publication is not barred by limitation, verification and power of attorney defects are curable, and the plaint cannot be rejected at interlocutory stage for lack of cause of action.
2441a83976e884674378416946e257bef982d481ec9a149d607e6883828d3836
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition for voluntary winding up of M/s E-Mind Learning Software Services Private Limited after finding full compliance with statutory requirements under Section 497 of the Companies Act, 1956.
Thapar, Advocates v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail applications of accused in a Rs. 200 crore real estate fraud, emphasizing the gravity of economic offences and the accused's fraudulent conduct, directing expedited trial.
Thapar, Advocates v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail applications of accused in a Rs. 200 crore real estate fraud, emphasizing the gravity of economic offences and public interest in denying bail.
Petitioner v. NATIONAL COUNICL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ORS. .....
The Delhi High Court held that NCTE cannot reject teacher education course recognition applications solely on a State Government's negative recommendation without hearing applicants and directed fresh consideration under new regulations to be notified.
Mr.Rohit Madan,Sr.Standing Counsel with Mr.Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate v. MR. SARKAR NATH OBEROI .....
The Delhi High Court held that TDS deposited before the return filing due date avoids disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) and affirmed entitlement to higher depreciation on motor lorries used in transportation business on hire.
Through Plaintiff in person v. MOTION PICTURES ASSOCIATION .....Defendant
The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for specific performance as barred by the three-year limitation period fixed under Article 54 of the Limitation Act, holding that the agreement had lapsed due to plaintiff's failure to perform within the stipulated time.
Through Mr.Atul Bandhu Adv v. ADARSH KUMAR OBEROI & ORS
The Delhi High Court allowed transfer and consolidation of a civil suit with probate proceedings involving overlapping property disputes to avoid multiplicity of litigation and expedite justice.
ASHOK SOLOMON v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act are deemed lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession was not taken and compensation not paid for over five years, regardless of stay orders preventing possession.
RAJIV GUPTA & ANR v. CORAM:-
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years, regardless of physical possession.
HEMANT SHARMA & ORS ..... Petitioners Through Mr. J.C. Mahindroo, Advocate with petitioners. v. STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR .....
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes on the basis of an amicable settlement and mutual divorce decree, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
MANISH GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Kamal Katyan, Advocate with petitioner. v. STATE & ANR .....
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes on the basis of a complete and voluntary settlement between the parties and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
b71b1b1e2df3741d1fc4384d449178e6a47f60620234bbfe228be14e6d5a18c8
The Delhi High Court allowed the Official Liquidator's application to dissolve M/s India Insulator Limited under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956, discharging the Liquidator and directing transfer of undisbursed funds as unclaimed dividend.
Mr. R.K. Anand, Advocate with petitioners in person. v. STATE & ANR .....
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes on the basis of an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, emphasizing the court's inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and serve ends of justice.
Through Mr. J. K. Bhola, Advocate v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on a full settlement and mutual divorce, applying the inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
SANJAY & ORS ..... Petitioners Through Mr. R. P. Bhardwaj, Advocate with petitioners. v. THE STATE & ANR .....
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes after the parties settled amicably and obtained a mutual consent divorce, holding that such settlements justify quashing under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to secure ends of justice.