Delhi High Court
93,075 judgments
MADAN MOHAN SINGH & ANR v. LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR AND ANR
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition under the 1894 Act lapses if compensation is not paid within five years prior to the 2013 Act's commencement, declaring the acquisition in this case lapsed.
PRITAM SINGH @ PRITAM AND ANR v. For the
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years, regardless of physical possession.
NARESH KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Pradeep Agrawal, Advocate v. PARVEEN KUMAR AND ORS. .....
The Delhi High Court modified the tribunal's award to hold both the Maruti van and tractor drivers jointly liable for the accident, directing the insurer to pay compensation while rejecting the claim of permanent disability for lack of medical evidence.
CWICK (IMPORT CONSOLIDATIONS) PVT. LTD v. INDIAN AGRICULTURE RESEARCH INSTITUTE
The Delhi High Court held that blacklisting a contractor by a government authority must be fair, reasonable, and proportionate, and set aside the indefinite blacklisting of the petitioner for alleged overcharging, allowing only a limited period of blacklisting.
RAMESH ..... Through Mr.Sanjeev Srivastava, Advocate. v. MOOL CHAND & ORS .....
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by affirming temporary disability, adding future prospects to income, and increasing non-pecuniary damages due to insufficient proof of employment and income.
J.K. JAIN v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR
The Delhi High Court allowed reimbursement of medical expenses incurred at a non-empanelled hospital in an emergency, holding that proximity must be measured from the initial hospital and medical necessity justifies shifting.
MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED v. FUJITSHU INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award resolving disputes between MTNL and Fujitsu Group, holding that the arbitrator had jurisdiction despite a prior settlement, and rejecting challenges on commissioning, payments, interest, and delay grounds.
1a6e286cb86b33441247dd9ab3bc459008a1fbc64bb1a9c1fba8dfe65f8c937f
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between two companies under sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 after statutory compliance and no objections from authorities.
f7be0fd988dd76943ed14313cb2f7e345d3dd6bcc48ec27bf1a1af1f07cfc165
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Arrangement for demerger between RateGain IT Solutions and Ridaan Real Estate under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 after ensuring compliance with statutory requirements and addressing the Regional Director's observations.
Mr.Nihit Nagpal, Advocates v. VIRGIN PARADISE AIRLINES TRAINING PVT. LTD. ..... Defendant
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to Virgin Enterprises Ltd. against Virgin Paradise Airlines Training Pvt. Ltd. for trademark infringement and passing off involving the 'Virgin' mark.
Mr. Amarjit Singh Sahni, Advocate. v. SATPAL SINGH KOHLI & ORS. ......
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the trial court’s imposition of costs on the plaintiff for withdrawing a suit after five years of litigation, affirming limited interference under Article 227.
Mr. Gaurav Goel, Advocate. v. RAJ SINGH & ORS .....
The Delhi High Court dismissed a contempt petition for delay and held that ploughing land does not violate a status quo order under Section 20 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
SAKSHI RAWAL & ORS ..... Petitioners Through Mr.Rajiv Bajaj, Adv. v. PANKAJ RAWAL .....
The Delhi High Court enhanced interim maintenance from Rs. 10,000 to Rs. 15,000 per month for a wife and minor daughters under the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, emphasizing consideration of parties' status, needs, and respondent's capacity to pay.
SURENDER SINGH & ANR v. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS
Acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years, regardless of possession disputes.
Mr. Shiv Pande and Mr. Vadudhara Nagrath, Advocates with petitioner in person. v. THE STATE & ANR .....
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 287 and 337 IPC based on an amicable settlement between employer and employee arising from a workplace accident, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Mr. Pavan Narang and Ms. Vasundhara, Chauhan, Advocates v. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION .....
The Delhi High Court denied suspension of sentence in a serious criminal fraud case but granted interim bail to the appellant to facilitate payment under an approved one-time settlement with the bank.
Mr. R.M Bagai, Mr. Yasin and Ms. Damini Khurana, Advocates. v. SMT. KAUSAR PARVEEN ......
The Delhi High Court held that under the Delhi Rent Control Act, a tenant must mandatorily deposit rent with the Rent Controller under Section 27 after landlord's refusal to accept tendered rent to avoid eviction under Section 14(1)(a).
Through: Mr. Anwar Jamal, Advocate v. STATE (DELHI ADMN) & ANR
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes on the basis of an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, applying the inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Mr.Krishna Kumar R.S., Mr.Raj Kumar Prasad, Mr.Naved, Advs. v. STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....
The Delhi High Court upheld the rape conviction based on eyewitness and DNA evidence but modified the life sentence to exclude imprisonment for the remainder of natural life.
Ms. Arati Mahajan Shedha, Adv. v. SHRI RAM KUMAR, EX. DRIVER .....
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's award granting full backwages and continuity of service to a dismissed employee due to lack of evidence and non-approval of dismissal under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act.