Delhi High Court
93,075 judgments
Dharamveer Singh v. Hotel Corporation of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging non-promotion due to adverse ACR remarks after the petitioner was promoted, holding that timely communication and acknowledgment of ACRs preclude relief for non-communication.
AVTEC LIMITED v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
The Delhi High Court quashed a reopening notice under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act issued beyond four years, holding that the Assessing Officer must have an independent reason to believe income escaped assessment based on failure to disclose material facts.
Sunita Devi v. Roop Ram & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the trial court's order allowing amendment of the plaint to file an amended site plan and claim possession, holding that such amendments arising from the same facts should be liberally allowed and are not subject to limitation scrutiny at the amendment stage.
M/S. GOYAL MG GASES PVT. LTD. v. State
Delhi courts lack territorial jurisdiction to try Section 138 NI Act complaints based on multi-city cheque presentation; jurisdiction lies only where the cheque is dishonoured at the drawee bank's home branch.
M/S. GOYAL MG GASES PVT. LTD. v. State
The Delhi High Court held that territorial jurisdiction for complaints under Section 138 NI Act lies only where the cheque is dishonoured by the home branch of the drawee bank, and presentation of multi-city cheques at non-home branches does not confer jurisdiction on courts at those places.
M/S. GOYAL MG GASES PVT. LTD. v. State
Delhi courts lack territorial jurisdiction to try Section 138 NI Act complaints based on multi-city cheques presented at non-home branches; jurisdiction lies only where the cheque is dishonoured at the home branch.
M/S. GOYAL MG GASES PVT. LTD. v. State
Delhi High Court held that territorial jurisdiction for prosecution under Section 138 NI Act lies only at the home branch where the cheque is dishonoured, and presentation of multi-city cheques at non-home branches does not confer jurisdiction on courts where such branches are located.
M/S. GOYAL MG GASES PVT. LTD. v. State
Delhi courts lack territorial jurisdiction to try Section 138 NI Act complaints for multi-city cheques dishonoured at the drawee bank's home branch outside Delhi.
M/S. GOYAL MG GASES PVT. LTD. v. State
Delhi courts lack territorial jurisdiction to try Section 138 NI Act complaints based on multi-city cheques presented at non-home branches; jurisdiction lies only where the cheque is dishonoured at the home branch.
M/S. GOYAL MG GASES PVT. LTD. v. State
Delhi courts lack territorial jurisdiction to try Section 138 NI Act complaints for multi-city cheques dishonoured at the drawee bank's home branch located outside Delhi.
M/S. GOYAL MG GASES PVT. LTD. v. State
Delhi courts lack territorial jurisdiction to try Section 138 NI Act complaints based on multi-city cheques presented at non-home branches; jurisdiction lies only where the cheque is dishonoured by the home branch.
M/S. GOYAL MG GASES PVT. LTD. v. State
Delhi courts lack territorial jurisdiction to try Section 138 NI Act complaints for multi-city cheques dishonoured at the drawee bank's home branch outside Delhi.
Sangeeta Mudgal v. Rahul Dutt Mudgal
The Delhi High Court dismissed a contempt petition for non-compliance with matrimonial settlement terms, holding that mere breach of settlement does not constitute contempt without wilful disobedience of a court order.
M/S RPP INFRA PROJECTS LTD v. M/S NTPC TAMIL NADU ENERGY & ANR
The Delhi High Court held that unconditional bank guarantees can be invoked despite pending arbitration and contractual disputes unless fraud or irreparable injury is shown, dismissing the petition restraining invocation.
Anil Gambhir v. CPWD and Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the CPWD's classification of day to day maintenance and related works as specialized contracts, rejecting challenges of arbitrariness and violation of Article 14.
M/S. GOYAL MG GASES PVT. LTD. v. State
Delhi courts lack territorial jurisdiction to try Section 138 NI Act complaints for multi-city cheques dishonoured at the drawee bank's home branch located elsewhere.
M/S. GOYAL MG GASES PVT. LTD. v. State
Delhi courts lack territorial jurisdiction to try Section 138 NI Act complaints based on multi-city cheques presented at non-home branches; jurisdiction lies only where the cheque is dishonoured at the home branch.
M/S. GOYAL MG GASES PVT. LTD. v. State
Delhi courts lack territorial jurisdiction to try Section 138 NI Act complaints based on multi-city cheques presented at non-home branches; jurisdiction lies only where the cheque is dishonoured by the drawee bank's home branch.
M/S. GOYAL MG GASES PVT. LTD. v. State
Delhi Courts lack territorial jurisdiction to try Section 138 NI Act complaints based on multi-city cheques presented at non-home branches; jurisdiction lies only where the cheque is dishonoured at the home branch.
M/S. GOYAL MG GASES PVT. LTD. v. State
Delhi courts lack territorial jurisdiction to try Section 138 NI Act complaints for multi-city cheques dishonoured at the home branch, requiring filing at the drawee bank's home branch court.