Delhi High Court
93,075 judgments
Sonia v. Delhi State Subordinate Service Selection Board and Anr.
The High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, holding that service-related disputes against the Delhi State Subordinate Service Selection Board fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Central Administrative Tribunal.
Omaxe Infrastructure and Construction Ltd v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that invocation of unconditional bank guarantees without specifying detailed breaches is valid and refused interim injunction restraining their encashment.
Mohd. Afzal v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 21(c) NDPS Act, holding that unexplained variations in narcotic sample purity and weight do not create reasonable doubt if credible scientific explanations are provided and statutory presumptions remain unrebutted.
Anupama Gupta v. Kuldeep Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging a decree of specific performance on grounds of fraud already raised and rejected by the Supreme Court, holding the decree executable and the fresh suit barred as abuse of process.
Upras Vidyalaya and Anr v. The Director of Education and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed the administrative takeover of a private school management for arbitrariness and lack of natural justice, holding that management disputes must be resolved by civil courts and not by the Directorate of Education.
Amitabh Verma v. Sneh Lata Malhotra
The Delhi High Court upheld a decree of possession passed under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC, holding that valid termination of tenancy and admitted landlord-tenant relationship suffice for eviction even at the evidence stage.
Omaxe Infrastructure and Construction Ltd v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that invocation of unconditional bank guarantees without specifying exact breach is valid and refused interim injunction restraining their encashment.
Upras Vidyalaya and Ors. v. The Director of Education
The Delhi High Court held that the Director of Education must consider the petitioners' request for change of school name without arbitrary refusal pending other management disputes, directing a reasoned decision within six weeks.
Mohit Jain v. Thomas Cook (India) Limited
The High Court upheld the Labour Court's award denying reinstatement and awarding compensation to a cashier terminated for negligence causing financial loss, dismissing the writ petition for modification.
Rakesh Kumar Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that a second disciplinary trial and dismissal for the same charge after the first trial was set aside as devoid of merit violated the protection against double jeopardy under Article 20(2) of the Constitution and quashed the dismissal orders.
Omaxe Infrastructure and Construction Ltd v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that invocation of unconditional bank guarantees without specifying exact breach is proper and refused interim injunction restraining their encashment.
Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate v. HARI KANT SINGH & ORS.....
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurer's appeal, upholding the compensation awarded for a fatal motorcycle accident caused by the offending vehicle's negligence, affirming the application of future prospects and multiplier based on the deceased's age.
MakeMyTrip (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Make My Tours Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction restraining defendants from using marks and logos deceptively similar to the plaintiff's well-known trademarks in the online travel business, recognizing trademark infringement and passing off.
M/S TARA LOGITECH PRIVATE LTD. v. M/S RELIGARE FINVEST LIMITED & ANR.
A non-party to arbitration cannot challenge an arbitral award under Section 34; objections to attachment of property in execution must be raised in execution proceedings under the CPC.
M/S. ROSHINLAL GUPTA & SONS v. PRESIDING OFFICER & ANR.
The Delhi High Court modified a Labour Court Award of reinstatement with back wages to a lump sum monetary compensation where the terminated employee was unwilling to be reinstated and no domestic enquiry was held.
HRG Impex Pvt. Ltd v. Bry-Air (Asia) Pvt. Ltd
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between HRG Impex Pvt. Ltd and Bry-Air (Asia) Pvt. Ltd under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, clarifying that Income Tax authorities retain their rights irrespective of the sanction.
Earthcon Vertical Limits Infracon Private Limited v. Earthcon Constructions Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between two companies under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, subject to compliance with statutory requirements and without affecting liabilities for statutory breaches.
SIKSHA SEWA SAMITI & ORS. v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking directions for continuous Urdu medium education, holding that the State is taking adequate steps to address the issues raised.
Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd v. Rajwati & Ors.
The Delhi High Court modified a motor accident compensation award by reducing the deduction for personal expenses and upholding a 50% enhancement for future prospects, clarifying principles for calculating loss of dependency where the deceased's income is unproven.