Delhi High Court
93,075 judgments
Lokesh Kumar Sharan v. Delhi Technological University
The Delhi High Court dismissed as premature a petition seeking exclusion of over-aged candidates from an ongoing university recruitment process, allowing the petitioner to approach the Court after its conclusion.
Rajan Bhagat v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that seniority must be fixed from the date of initial officiating appointment under DANIPS Rules, following Supreme Court precedent and binding government Circulars, allowing the petitioner’s writ petition.
Sanjay v. The State (Govt. of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of robbery and house trespass charges due to investigative lapses and failure of the prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Indo Soviet Medical Education Care & Research Foundation v. Anju Jain & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a party entitled to refund under a failed contract must receive interest on the refunded amount as restitution, modifying the decree to award 10% interest from suit filing date.
Vijay Kumar Dahiya and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld cancellation of appointments made through a recruitment process tainted by widespread irregularities, affirming the government's discretion to scrap flawed recruitments in public interest.
Sh. Manjeet Sharma and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court reserved and pronounced judgment on multiple writ petitions filed by government press employees against the Union of India concerning employment-related issues.
National Thermal Power Corporation Limited v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-II
The Delhi High Court dismissed NTPC's petition challenging EPFO orders directing payment of penal interest and administrative charges under the Employees' Provident Funds Act, affirming liability despite retention of funds under court orders.
ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. ASHOK SEN GUPTA & ORS
The Delhi High Court modified a motor accident compensation award by reducing functional disability from 50% to 40%, upheld 50% enhancement for future prospects, and rejected deduction of one-third from loss of future earnings.
Jagjit Singh Oberoi v. Ranjeet Kaur & Anr
The Delhi High Court granted specific performance of an agreement to sell property, conditioning it on payment of balance consideration and additional compensation due to increased property value.
CNS Infotech (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Ratna Commercial Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Amalgamation under the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with meetings of shareholders and creditors due to unanimous consents and absence of creditors.
V K Gupta v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the Sessions Judge's order reversing discharge of Junior Engineers accused of conspiracy and diversion of spurious cement bags, holding prima facie material existed to frame charges and proceed to trial.
The Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi-IV v. GE Capital Business Process Management Services Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's factual finding that computer peripherals are entitled to 60% depreciation under the Income Tax Act, dismissing the Revenue's appeal and delay application.
Rameshwar Singh v. Delhi Jal Board
The Delhi High Court held that long-serving daily wage workers performing perennial duties are entitled to regularization despite lacking prescribed qualifications, setting aside the denial of their claims.
Syndicate Bank v. K. Periaswami
The Delhi High Court upheld removal of a bank employee for gross misconduct involving unauthorized business activities, setting aside the Tribunal's reduction of punishment to discharge simpliciter.
Sh. Manjeet Sharma and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The document is an index page of multiple writ petitions before the Delhi High Court with no substantive judgment text provided.
Thomas Cook (India) Limited v. Mohit Jain & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld a Labour Court award granting compensation to an employee designated as executive but performing cashier duties, holding that inadvertent error promptly reimbursed does not justify termination without relief.
Anand Shekhar Singh v. M/S APCO Construction Pvt Ltd & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendant's delayed application for leave to defend in a summary suit for recovery of Rs. 22 lakhs, decreeing the suit in favor of the plaintiff due to inexcusable delay and lack of sufficient cause.
Bihar Sugar Mills Association & Others v. UOI & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Government's levy sugar price notification for 1974-75 effective from 12.07.1975, dismissing the appellants' challenge to extend price fixation to the entire season and to compensate for prior losses.