Delhi High Court

93,075 judgments

Year:

Motiwala & Ors. v. State & Ors.

19 Jan 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:526

The Delhi High Court quashed two cross FIRs arising from a resolved dispute over an electricity bill, emphasizing the power to end criminal proceedings upon amicable settlement to prevent abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR amicable settlement abuse of process of law cross FIRs

Suraj & Anr. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

19 Jan 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:525

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 363/366 IPC where the adult prosecutrix voluntarily accompanied and married the accused, emphasizing consent and amicable resolution.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 363 IPC Section 366 IPC consent

M/S Lakhani Rubber Works v. UOI and Ors.

19 Jan 2015 · Deepa Sharma · 2015:DHC:502

The Delhi High Court restrained coercive recovery actions against the petitioner until their statutory appeal under the EPF Act could be heard, due to the government's failure to appoint a Presiding Officer of the Appellate Tribunal.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Employee’s Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Section 14B Section 7(I) Appellate Tribunal

Lakhani Footwear Limited v. Union of India and Ors.

19 Jan 2015 · Deepa Sharma · 2015:DHC:501

The Delhi High Court restrained coercive recovery under EPF Act where the statutory appeal could not be heard due to the absence of the Appellate Tribunal’s Presiding Officer.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Employee’s Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Section 14B Section 7(I) Appellate Tribunal

Ram Kumar v. Commissioner of Customs

16 Jan 2015 · Sanjiv Khanna; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2015:DHC:477-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a person acting merely as a carrier of seized currency not owned by him is not entitled to pay a fine in lieu of confiscation under Section 125 of the Customs Act, and upheld absolute confiscation and dismissal of the writ petition.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Section 125 confiscation foreign currency

Satellitehealthcare Pvt Ltd v. GE Capital Service India

16 Jan 2015 · S. Muralidhar · 2015:DHC:11771

The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant to withdraw the arbitration appeal after full payment was made, disposing of the appeal and related applications accordingly.

civil appeal_dismissed appeal withdrawal payment of amount disposal of appeal arbitration appeal

Madan Lal v. NDMC

16 Jan 2015 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2015:DHC:11495

The Court held that disputes regarding street vendors' rights must be resolved by the Town Vending Committee under the Street Vendors Act, directing the NDMC to make the Committee functional and dismissing writ petitions seeking injunctions against eviction.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Street Vendors Act 2014 Section 3(3) Town Vending Committee street vending

Nay Chetana Shiksha Samiti Badhra v. National Council for Teacher Education

16 Jan 2015 · Vibhu BakhrU · 2015:DHC:11494

The Delhi High Court directed that applications for recognition of teacher education courses must be processed under new regulations with an opportunity to cure deficiencies before rejection, ensuring procedural fairness.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant recognition of teacher education courses statutory procedure opportunity of hearing National Council for Teacher Education

Devender Yadav v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation

16 Jan 2015 · M. K. Vibhui BakhrU · 2015:DHC:11492

The Delhi High Court directed the constitution and functioning of the Town Vending Committee under the Street Vendors Act, 2014, granting interim protection to street vendors pending certification and resolving disputes through the statutory forum.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Street Vendors Act 2014 Section 3(3) Town Vending Committee street vendors

Lal Babu Bhagat v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation (Rohini Zone)

16 Jan 2015 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2015:DHC:11488

The Delhi High Court directed the constitution and functioning of the Town Vending Committee under the Street Vendors Act, 2014, holding it as the proper forum to adjudicate street vendors' rights and denying interim injunctions against eviction before certification.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Street Vendors Act 2014 Section 3(3) Town Vending Committee street vendors

Raj Devi v. MOD & Ors.

16 Jan 2015 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2015:DHC:11455

The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions challenging demolition of unauthorized constructions as withdrawn following a legislative amendment barring demolition of constructions made before June 11, 2014.

administrative petition_dismissed unauthorized construction demolition Municipal Corporation of Delhi NCT of Delhi Laws Amendment Act 2014

Vijay Kotha v. State

16 Jan 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:10592

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 498-A IPC based on an amicable settlement between spouses, emphasizing that continuation of criminal proceedings in settled matrimonial disputes would be futile.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 498-A IPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute settlement agreement

National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Prem & Ors.

16 Jan 2015 · G. P. Mittal · 2015:DHC:471

The Delhi High Court held that a driver with permission who is neither a third party nor an employee cannot claim compensation under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act against the owner's insurer if responsible for the accident.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 163-A Motor Vehicles Act compensation motor accident claim owner's insurer liability

Sangeeta Vats & Ors. v. IFFCO-TOKIO General Insurance Company Ltd. & Anr.

16 Jan 2015 · G. P. Mittal · 2015:DHC:473

The Delhi High Court held that the insurer of a rented vehicle is not liable to pay compensation under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act for an accident caused by an unknown vehicle when the deceased hirer was driving the vehicle.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 163-A insurance liability unknown vehicle accident

Commissioner of Income Tax-15 v. M/S RELCOM

16 Jan 2015 · S. RAVINDRA BHAT; R.K. GAUBA · 2015:DHC:479-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the assessee's claim to TDS credit despite non-declaration of corresponding income, emphasizing substance over procedural technicalities under Section 199 of the Income Tax Act.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 199 Income Tax Act TDS credit Income Tax Appellate Tribunal sister concern

Designers’ Guild United v. Simplex Infrastructure Limited

16 Jan 2015 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2015:DHC:470

The Delhi High Court held that a determinable architectural services contract without a negative covenant against termination cannot be specifically enforced by injunction, and damages are an adequate remedy for wrongful termination.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Specific Relief Act, 1963 termination of contract injunction

Rohit Gandhi v. Punjab National Bank

16 Jan 2015 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2015:DHC:469

The Delhi High Court reduced the petitioner’s punishment from removal to compulsory retirement in a departmental enquiry for procedural irregularities in loan sanctioning, holding the original penalty disproportionate given the petitioner’s limited role.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant departmental enquiry disproportionate punishment removal from service compulsory retirement

Gurdeep Singh v. Punjab & Sindh Bank & Ors.

16 Jan 2015 · S. Ravindra Bhat; R.K. Gauba · 2015:DHC:465-DB

The Delhi High Court held that recovery proceedings under the Recovery of Debts Act and SARFAESI Act can be stayed pending final adjudication of a civil suit alleging fraud in mortgage documents to prevent irreparable prejudice.

civil petition_allowed Significant Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 SARFAESI Act, 2002 equitable mortgage fraudulent mortgage

Akari Enterprises LLC v. Genesis Luxury Fashion Pvt Ltd

16 Jan 2015 · S. Muralidhar · 2015:DHC:476

The Delhi High Court held that in international commercial arbitrations, the Chief Justice of India exclusively appoints arbitrators under Section 11(12)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and dismissed the petition seeking appointment by the High Court.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant international commercial arbitration appointment of arbitrator Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act Chief Justice of India jurisdiction

Dr. Minu Kashyap v. Shri Lal Bahadur Shastri Rashtriya Sanskrit Vidyapeeth & Ors.

16 Jan 2015 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2015:DHC:475

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the inquiry report exonerating the respondent, holding that the report was validly constituted and not liable to be quashed on grounds of bias or procedural irregularity.

administrative petition_dismissed inquiry committee gender discrimination sexual harassment natural justice