Full Text
Translation output
c $-21 to 28 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 5730/2011 & CM No.12795/2011
RAJ DEVI Petitioner
W.P.(C) 5730/2011 & CM No.12795/2011
RAJ DEVI Petitioner
VERSUS
MOD & ORS Respondents AND
W.P.(C) 5766/2011 & CM No.12796/2011
ADITYA DABAS Petitioner
ADITYA DABAS Petitioner
VERSUS
MCD & ORS Respondents AND
W.P.(C) 5944/2011 & CM No.12955/2011
RAMESH Petitioner
RAMESH Petitioner
VERSUS
MCD AND ORS Respondents AND
W.P.(C) 5733/2011 & CM No.12798/2011
DHARAMENDAR Petitioner
DHARAMENDAR Petitioner
VERSUS
AND
W.P.(C) 5734/2011 & CM No.12800/2011
RAMBIR & ANR Petitioners
RAMBIR & ANR Petitioners
VERSUS
AND
W.P.(C) 5736/2011 & CM No.12799/2011
RAM SINGH Petitioner
RAM SINGH Petitioner
VERSUS
MCD &ORS Respondents AND
W.P.(C) 5735/2011 & CM No.12797/2011
DHIRENDER DABAS Petitioner 2015:DHC:11455
DHIRENDER DABAS Petitioner 2015:DHC:11455
VERSUS
MCD & ORS AND W.P.fC) 7448/2013 & CM No.15945/2013
KALAWATI & ORS.
KALAWATI & ORS.
VERSUS
NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS. Respondents
Through; Mr Anand Yadav, Advocate for petitioners in all the items.
Ms Saroj Bidawat, Advocate for NDMC in item no.21 & 26.
Mr Mukesh Gupta, Standing Cousnel for NDMC in item no.24 & 27.
Mr Pradeep Desodya, Ms Anjana Gosain for GNCT with Mr Anil I<j.-.
! (Inspector) in 23.
Mr Dhritiman Roy, proxy for Mr Shyel Trihan, Advocates for MCD in item no.23.
Mr Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC i with Mr T. P. Singh, Advocate for R-
4/UOI.
Mr G. D. Mishra, Advocate for respondent/NDMC in item no.25.
Mr Nikhil Rohatgi, Advocate for R-1.
Through; Mr Anand Yadav, Advocate for petitioners in all the items.
Ms Saroj Bidawat, Advocate for NDMC in item no.21 & 26.
Mr Mukesh Gupta, Standing Cousnel for NDMC in item no.24 & 27.
Mr Pradeep Desodya, Ms Anjana Gosain for GNCT with Mr Anil I<j.-.
! (Inspector) in 23.
Mr Dhritiman Roy, proxy for Mr Shyel Trihan, Advocates for MCD in item no.23.
Mr Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC i with Mr T. P. Singh, Advocate for R-
4/UOI.
Mr G. D. Mishra, Advocate for respondent/NDMC in item no.25.
Mr Nikhil Rohatgi, Advocate for R-1.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
16.01.2015 The learned counsel for the respondents state, on instructions, that in view of the National Capital Territory of Delhi Laws (Special Provisions)
Second (Amendment) Act, 2014, no demolition can be undertaken in respect of unauthorized construction carried out prior to 11.06.2014.
Respondents Petitioners In view of the above statement, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw the present petitions with liberty to file afresh, if a cause so arises.
Dismissed as withdrawn withthe aforesaid liberty.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J JANUARY 16, 2015 MK
16.01.2015 The learned counsel for the respondents state, on instructions, that in view of the National Capital Territory of Delhi Laws (Special Provisions)
Second (Amendment) Act, 2014, no demolition can be undertaken in respect of unauthorized construction carried out prior to 11.06.2014.
Respondents Petitioners In view of the above statement, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw the present petitions with liberty to file afresh, if a cause so arises.
Dismissed as withdrawn withthe aforesaid liberty.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J JANUARY 16, 2015 MK
JUDGMENT