Delhi High Court

93,075 judgments

Year:

Symed Labs Ltd. v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Anr.

19 Jan 2015 · G. P. Mittal · 2015:DHC:516

Delhi High Court granted ad interim injunction restraining defendants from infringing plaintiff's process patents for manufacturing Linezolid, holding presence of patented intermediates and non-disclosure of process establish prima facie infringement.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant process patent infringement Linezolid intermediate compounds patent validity

Chandan v. Dipti

19 Jan 2015 · Kailash Gambhir; I. S. Mehta · 2015:DHC:517-DB

The High Court upheld the Family Court's dismissal of a joint divorce petition due to the respondent's failure to appear, affirming that mutual consent must subsist at the time of hearing for divorce by mutual consent under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act.

family appeal_dismissed Significant divorce by mutual consent Section 13-B Hindu Marriage Act mutual consent Family Courts Act

Lalit Kumar & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Ors.

19 Jan 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:518

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Section 307 IPC arising from a trivial dispute and simple injury, applying the Supreme Court's guidelines on quashing FIRs based on settlement and prima facie assessment.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 307 IPC Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR inherent powers of High Court

Lalit Kumar & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Ors.

19 Jan 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:519

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Section 307 IPC based on a settlement and prima facie assessment showing simple injury, emphasizing cautious exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 307 IPC Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR inherent powers

Naveen Kumar v. State; Karamvir Singh v. State

19 Jan 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:520

The Delhi High Court granted pre-arrest bail to petitioners in a fraud-related case under Sections 420, 468, and 471 IPC, subject to bail bonds and sureties, after they cooperated with the investigation.

criminal appeal_allowed pre-arrest bail Section 420 IPC Section 468 IPC Section 471 IPC

Naveen Kumar v. State; Karamvir Singh v. State

19 Jan 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:521

The Delhi High Court granted pre-arrest bail to accused petitioners in a cheating and forgery case, making interim protection absolute subject to bail bonds and sureties.

criminal appeal_allowed pre-arrest bail Section 420 IPC Section 468 IPC Section 471 IPC

Fayaz Ahmed Khan & Ors v. State & Anr

19 Jan 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:522

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable mediated settlement in a matrimonial dispute, emphasizing that continuation of criminal proceedings would be futile and contrary to justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 498-A IPC matrimonial dispute mediated settlement

Rakesh Raj v. State of Delhi

19 Jan 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:523

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court’s refusal to extend interim bail due to lack of bonafides but directed the bail application to be heard on merits after taking the petitioner into custody.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant interim bail economic offences bonafides deposit of amount

M/S Samiah International Builders Pvt Ltd v. State & Anr

19 Jan 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:524

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 420, 406, 506, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, affirming the power to end criminal proceedings where continuation would be unjust.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR compromise deed settlement Sections 420, 406, 506, 34 IPC

Saroj Kumar Thakur v. Vishwakarma Devi

19 Jan 2015 · Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:503

The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of leave to defend in an eviction petition, holding that a triable issue regarding the property ownership requires granting leave to defend under the Delhi Rent Control Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 eviction petition leave to defend adverse possession

Vijay Gandhi v. Veena Kumari

19 Jan 2015 · Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:500

The Delhi High Court held that a landlord’s bona fide requirement for eviction can be prospective and reasonably foreseeable, dismissing tenants’ petitions challenging eviction orders.

property appeal_dismissed Significant bona fide requirement eviction petition landlord-tenant relationship leave to defend

Federation of Residents Welfare Associations, Vasant Kunj v. Union of India & Ors.

19 Jan 2015 · The Chief Justice; Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2015:DHC:480-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition challenging closure of an unauthorized cremation ground, holding that the closure order was justified after proper enquiry and that a non-party without ownership rights lacked locus to challenge it.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant review petition closure of cremation ground Section 391 Delhi Municipal Corporation Act local enquiry

Union of India & Anr. v. M/S Mahalaxmi Saw Mills Pvt. Ltd.

19 Jan 2015 · The Chief Justice; Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2015:DHC:481-DB

The Delhi High Court condoned a four-year delay and restored an appeal dismissed in default, emphasizing a pragmatic approach to procedural delays involving government litigants and important legal questions.

civil appeal_allowed Significant condonation of delay restoration of appeal default dismissal unearned increase

Rashmi Bansal & Ors. v. State & Anr

19 Jan 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:528

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 370, 371, 354, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR amicable settlement abuse of process Section 370 IPC

Bindu Dhanwal & Ors. v. Balwinder Kumar & Ors.

19 Jan 2015 · Chief Justice; Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J. · 2015:DHC:482-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld demolition orders against unauthorized construction, affirming that contempt jurisdiction includes enforcement of writ petition directions and that appellants cannot avoid demolition by delaying challenge or seeking impleadment in contempt proceedings.

property appeal_dismissed Significant unauthorized construction demolition order contempt proceedings writ petition enforcement

Sanjay Sharma v. State

19 Jan 2015 · Manmohan Singh · 2015:DHC:491

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a land allotment fraud case, emphasizing the constitutional right to liberty and the need to balance seriousness of offence with evidence and investigation status.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail economic offences land allotment fraud Section 120-B IPC

LALA DIWAN CHAND TRUST v. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL

19 Jan 2015 · Vibhu Bakhru, J · 2015:DHC:490

The Delhi High Court held that a genuine testamentary bequest of leasehold property exempts the legatee from paying unearned increase, but acquisition by payment attracts liability on that share.

property appeal_allowed Significant unearned increase leasehold property testamentary bequest mutation

PHILIPS INDIA PVT. LTD. v. SHREE SANT KRIPA APPLIANCES PVT. LTD.

19 Jan 2015 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2015:DHC:487

The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's application for interim injunction against generic comparative advertisements by the defendant, holding that the plaintiff failed to prima facie prove malicious falsehood and special damage necessary for restraining commercial free speech in advertising.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant malicious falsehood trade libel permanent injunction comparative advertising

DDA v. M/S PARAGON CONSTRUCTION(INDIA)PVT LTD

19 Jan 2015 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2015:DHC:488-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld a 12% interest rate awarded in arbitration, ruling that a conditional deposit in court during appeal does not stop interest from accruing.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant interest rate arbitration award deposit in court payment in satisfaction

Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/S Kelvinator of India Ltd.

19 Jan 2015 · Sanjiv Khanna; V. Kameswar Rao · 2015:DHC:497-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that for deduction under Section 32AB of the Income Tax Act, profits of eligible business units must be computed separately without setting off losses from other units, and certain interest and dividend incomes classified as business income are includible for such deduction.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 32AB Income Tax Act eligible business profits deduction computation aggregation of profits and losses