Delhi High Court

93,453 judgments

Year:

M/S. BHAVIK TERRYFAB v. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER-II

03 Feb 2015 · V.P. Vaish · 2015:DHC:11579

The Delhi High Court restrained coercive enforcement of a provident fund order pending appeal before a non-functional Appellate Tribunal due to absence of a Presiding Officer.

administrative petition_allowed Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Section 14-B Section 7-I Employees' Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal

Guru Nanak Public School & Anr v. Mrs Dhanwant Kaur Butalia & Ors

03 Feb 2015 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2015:DHC:11575-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals against orders dismissing review petitions, holding that no appeal lies against review orders and factual issues regarding compliance and settlements are to be addressed in contempt proceedings.

civil appeal_dismissed appeal against review petition Sixth Central Pay Commission dearness allowance settlement with teachers

Supreme Court in Maharashtra Ekta Hawkers Union and v. Anr., 2013(1 1) SCALE 329

03 Feb 2015 · Vibhu BakhrU · 2015:DHC:11573

The Delhi High Court directed the constitution and functioning of the Town Vending Committee under the Street Vendors Act, 2014, allowing street vendors to continue vending until certificates are issued, and disposed of petitions seeking injunctions against eviction accordingly.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Street Vendors Act 2014 Section 3(3) Town Vending Committee street vendors

M/S Jyoti Engineers v. UOI & Ors.

03 Feb 2015 · V. P. Vaish · 2015:DHC:11570

The Delhi High Court restrained coercive recovery under the EPF Act pending disposal of an appeal before a non-functional EPF Appellate Tribunal due to absence of a Presiding Officer.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Section 14B Section 71 EPF Appellate Tribunal

M/S HBL GLOBAL PRIVATE LIMITED v. Shailendra Kumar Singh

03 Feb 2015 · V. P. Vaish · 2015:DHC:11551

The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging a labour court award after the parties settled the dispute through mediation, directing release of deposited amounts to the petitioner.

labour petition_allowed Labour Court award Reinstatement Back wages Settlement

Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Bhola Kushwaha & Ors.

03 Feb 2015 · G. P. Mittal · 2015:DHC:11347

The Delhi High Court allowed the insurer’s appeal to recover compensation paid due to the insured’s willful breach of the insurance policy, drawing adverse inference from the insured’s failure to contest or produce evidence.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim insurance policy breach recovery rights adverse inference

Commissioner of Income Tax-IV v. Hero Honda Motors Limited

03 Feb 2015 · Sanjiv Khanna; V. Kameswar Rao · 2015:DHC:11016-DB
Cites 6 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that payments under a limited 'know-how' license agreement are revenue expenses, not capital expenditure, affirming the ITAT's decision and dismissing the Revenue's appeals.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant capital expenditure revenue expenditure technical know-how license agreement

B.R.DHAWAN MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST & ORS. v. CYGNUS MEDICAREPVTLTD & ANR.

03 Feb 2015 · MUKTA GUPTA, J. · 2015:DHC:10802

The High Court allowed withdrawal of petitions challenging interim arbitration orders after the arbitration proceedings attained finality through Supreme Court adjudication.

arbitration petition_dismissed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 9 interim order arbitration proceedings

Harish Kumar & Anr. v. State & Anr.

03 Feb 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:1079

The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC read with Dowry Prohibition Act on the basis of an amicable settlement, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to secure ends of justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498-A IPC

Central Bureau of Investigation v. State

03 Feb 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:1080

The Delhi High Court quashed an order directing explanations against officials in search proceedings, holding that associating Bank Officers constituted substantial compliance with Section 100 CrPC and that audi alteram partem was violated.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 100 CrPC search proceedings audi alteram partem investigating officer

Mohan Kishore Saxena v. State & Anr

03 Feb 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:1081

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to summon an essential defence witness, setting aside the trial court's order that had refused the prayer on grounds of delay and procedural lapses.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant defence witness summoning witness trial court discretion delay in proceedings

Ankit Gupta & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

03 Feb 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:1086

The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act based on an amicable settlement, applying principles under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498-A IPC

Rakesh Khatri & Ors. v. The State (GNCT of Delhi) & Anr.

03 Feb 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:1085

The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement, applying the principles of inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to secure ends of justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute amicable settlement

Mirtunjay Kumar v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

03 Feb 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:1084

The Delhi High Court refused to quash an FIR under Sections 420, 468, and 471 IPC at the investigation stage despite a compromise deed, emphasizing completion of investigation before exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_dismissed Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR compromise deed investigation

United India Insurance Co Ltd v. Jay Devi & Ors.

03 Feb 2015 · G. P. Mittal · 2015:DHC:1093

The High Court set aside the compensation award in a motor accident claim for lack of proper inquiry into negligence and accident timing, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication.

motor_accident_claims remanded Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166 motor accident claim insurance liability

Reena Devi & Ors. v. Shyam Sunder & Anr

03 Feb 2015 · G. P. Mittal · 2015:DHC:1100

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the motor insurance policy did not cover the deceased owner’s injury and death as he was not driving the vehicle at the time of the accident.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 147 motor insurance policy personal accident cover

P.P. Singh and Another v. State and Another

03 Feb 2015 · Jayant Nath · 2015:DHC:1099

The Delhi High Court held that where no executor is appointed by a Will, a probate petition is not maintainable and must be treated as a petition for letters of administration with the Will annexed under the Indian Succession Act.

civil petition_dismissed Significant probate petition letters of administration Indian Succession Act executor

HCL Limited v. The Commissioner of Income Tax New Delhi

03 Feb 2015 · Sanjiv Khanna; V. Kameswar Rao · 2015:DHC:1088-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that lump sum payments for non-exclusive license to use technology constitute taxable royalty under the India-Germany DTAA, dismissing HCL's appeal.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant royalty intellectual property know-how Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement

Mahmood Ali Khan & Anr. v. Arun Kumar Singh & Ors.

03 Feb 2015 · G. P. Mittal · 2015:DHC:1098

The High Court set aside the Claims Tribunal's order closing petitioners' evidence and dismissing their application to summon witnesses, directing the Tribunal to ensure witness attendance and restoring petitioners' entitlement to interest.

civil appeal_allowed Claims Tribunal evidence closure summoning witnesses interest denial

Harvinder Singh v. State

03 Feb 2015 · Ved Prakash Vaish · 2015:DHC:1056

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings against the petitioner for lack of prima facie evidence, holding that the sale deed was bona fide and the petitioner was wrongly summoned as an accused without sufficient material.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of criminal proceedings criminal conspiracy vicarious liability