Full Text
Translation output
Crl.M.C.No.400/2015 Page 1 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: February 03, 2015
Date of Decision: February 03, 2015
CRL.M.C. 400/2015
MIRTUNJAY KUMAR ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Devender Singh Khatana, Advocate
MIRTUNJAY KUMAR ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Devender Singh Khatana, Advocate
VERSUS
THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Parvin Bhati, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent
No.1-State with SI Shri Gopal Mr. Aditya Vikram Jaiswal, Advocate with respondent No.2
Through: Mr. Parvin Bhati, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent
No.1-State with SI Shri Gopal Mr. Aditya Vikram Jaiswal, Advocate with respondent No.2
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
JUDGMENT
(ORAL)
Quashing of FIR No.2363/2014, under Sections 420/468/471 of the
IPC, registered at police station Shakarpur, Delhi is sought in this petition on the basis of Compromise Deed of 4th December, 2014 (Annexure-B).
Upon Notice, Mr. Parvin Bhati, learned Additional Public
Prosecutor for respondent-State submits that FSL report is awaited and in view of aforesaid Compromise Deed (Annexure-B), supplementary statement of respondent No.2/ complainant would be recorded.
Let the FSL report be obtained on priority and after taking it into consideration, final report be filed within a period of twelve weeks. As
2015:DHC:1084 Crl.M.C.No.400/2015 Page 2 investigation in this case is at the final stage, so this Court is not inclined to exercise its extra ordinary inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. to quash the proceedings arising out of FIR in question.
This petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail of the remedy, as available in the law, if need be.
(SUNIL GAUR)
JUDGE
FEBRUARY 03, 2015 r 2015:DHC:1084
Quashing of FIR No.2363/2014, under Sections 420/468/471 of the
IPC, registered at police station Shakarpur, Delhi is sought in this petition on the basis of Compromise Deed of 4th December, 2014 (Annexure-B).
Upon Notice, Mr. Parvin Bhati, learned Additional Public
Prosecutor for respondent-State submits that FSL report is awaited and in view of aforesaid Compromise Deed (Annexure-B), supplementary statement of respondent No.2/ complainant would be recorded.
Let the FSL report be obtained on priority and after taking it into consideration, final report be filed within a period of twelve weeks. As
2015:DHC:1084 Crl.M.C.No.400/2015 Page 2 investigation in this case is at the final stage, so this Court is not inclined to exercise its extra ordinary inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. to quash the proceedings arising out of FIR in question.
This petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail of the remedy, as available in the law, if need be.
(SUNIL GAUR)
JUDGE
FEBRUARY 03, 2015 r 2015:DHC:1084