Delhi High Court
93,453 judgments
Seema Jain & Ors. v. Passive Infra Projects P. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court declined to quash criminal complaints under Section 138 NI Act prematurely, directing petitioners to raise their pleas before the trial court at the framing of Notice stage under Section 251 Cr.P.C.
Seema Jain & Ors. v. Passive Infra Projects P. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court declined to quash criminal complaints under Section 138 NI Act at the pre-trial stage, directing petitioners to raise their pleas before the trial court at the framing of Notice under Section 251 Cr.P.C.
Seema Jain & Ors. v. Passive Infra Projects P. Ltd.
The High Court declined to quash complaints under Section 138 NI Act before framing of Notice under Section 251 Cr.P.C., directing petitioners to raise objections before the trial court which must pass a reasoned order.
Seema Jain & Ors. v. Passive Infra Projects P. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court declined to quash criminal complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act prematurely, directing petitioners to raise objections before the trial court at the framing of Notice stage under Section 251 Cr.P.C.
Dharamveer Singh v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed the summoning of the petitioner under Sections 364/302/34 IPC but upheld summoning under Sections 201/34 IPC based on prima facie evidence.
Joseph Samuel @ Raj Samuel v. Ashutosh Ahluwala
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking quashing of complaints under Section 138 NI Act, holding that disputed factual questions about compliance with a prior order must be decided by the trial court and cannot be resolved in quashing proceedings under Section 482 CrPC.
Joseph Samuel @ Raj Samuel v. Ashutosh Ahluwala
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking quashing of complaints under Section 138 NI Act, holding that disputed factual questions of compliance with a court order cannot be decided under Section 482 CrPC and must be adjudicated by the trial court.
Vimla Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that prosecution for false caste certificates requires prior verification by the Caste Scrutiny Committee and clarified that courts cannot direct filing of supplementary charge-sheets, mandating filing of final reports after investigation.
Priyanka Overseas (P) Ltd & Ors. v. State of NCT Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from a commercial dispute on the basis of an amicable settlement between parties, affirming the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process in civil-natured offences.
Narinder and Ors v. Sudhir Singh and Ors
The Delhi High Court disposed of a suit for permanent injunction based on a settlement between defendants, with plaintiffs satisfied and parties bearing their own costs.
Devender Dahiya & Ors. v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR under serious charges including Section 307 IPC, holding that compromise at an advanced trial stage is not sufficient to quash criminal proceedings.
KRNAL AGRICULTURAL INDUSTRIES LTD v. PRINCE INDUSTRIES
The Delhi High Court decreed a civil suit based on a voluntary settlement reached through court-annexed mediation and granted a 50% refund of court fees under Section 16-A of the Court Fees Act.
Balister Tyagi v. Om Prakash Tyagi and Others
The Delhi High Court referred the parties' disputes to arbitration under the arbitration clause in the MOU, appointed a sole arbitrator, and disposed of the suit accordingly.
Commissioner of Income Tax-XII v. M/S. GARG CHEAP CUT PIECE HOUSE
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's decision that the CIT's revision of the assessment under Section 263 was unwarranted as the AO had applied his mind and the order was not erroneous or prejudicial to Revenue.
Dharampal v. M/S North Delhi Power Ltd.
The court held that a disciplinary authority must afford a charged officer a hearing before disagreeing with the Enquiry Officer's exoneration, and remanded the case for fresh proceedings in accordance with natural justice.
Raj Karan v. M/S. All India Womens Conference
Dismissal of a workman without approval under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act is invalid, and refusal of such approval means the employee continues in service with full benefits.
M/S Central Chemist v. Its Workmen Deen Dayal
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court’s finding that the workman was terminated and had not abandoned service, dismissing the writ petition and awarding compensation in lieu of reinstatement due to closure of the petitioner’s business.
M/S ABHIJEET INFRA PVT LTD v. M/S MILSTONES SWITCHGEARS PVT LTD
The High Court held that disputes arising from a purchase order containing an arbitration clause must be referred to arbitration, while other disputes without such clause may be adjudicated by the civil court, allowing bifurcation of causes of action.
M/S MULTITECH CONSTRUCTION CO v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award rejecting the contractor's claim for loss of profit under a contract clause barring such claims when work could not commence due to reasons beyond the contractor's control, emphasizing limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
M/S AISHWARYA FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT LTD & ANR v. FUTURE VALUE RETAIL LTD
The Delhi High Court held that it has jurisdiction to entertain a Section 11 petition at the seat of arbitration but dismissed the petition for failure to follow the agreed procedure for appointing an arbitrator.