Narinder and Ors v. Sudhir Singh and Ors

Delhi High Court · 05 Feb 2015 · 2015:DHC:1178
Hima Kohli
CS(OS) 1485/2014
2015:DHC:1178
civil other

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of a suit for permanent injunction based on a settlement between defendants, with plaintiffs satisfied and parties bearing their own costs.

Full Text
Translation output
CS(OS) 1485/2014
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CS(OS) 1485/2014
Decided on 05.02.2015 IN THE MATTER OF:
NARINDER AND ORS ..... Plaintiffs
Through: Mr. Anand Yadav, Advocate with plaintiff No.1 in person.
VERSUS
SUDHIR SINGH AND ORS ..... Defendants
Through: Mr. Shiv Charan Garg, Advocate with Mr. Imran Khan, Advocate for D-1 to D-5.
Mr. A.P. Aggarwal, Advocate for D-6.
CORAM
HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J. (Oral)
I.A. 25592/2014 (joint application u/O XXIII R 3 CPC)
JUDGMENT

1. The plaintiffs have instituted the accompanying suit, praying inter alia for the relief of permanent injunction against the defendants in respect of their respective properties situated in the colony known as Budh Vihar, Phase-II, comprised in the revenue estate of village Rithala, Delhi.

2. Counsels for the parties state that during the pendency of the present proceedings, defendants No.1 to 5 and the defendant No.6 have arrived at a settlement as recorded in the Deed of Settlement 2015:DHC:1178 dated 14.11.2014, executed between the defendant No.6 as the duly constituted attorney of Shri Bhagirath Raj Sharma and Shri Vijay Kumar Sharma, Shri Sambhu Sharma and Shri Sunil Sharma, all sons of Shri Madan Lal Sharma on one side and the defendants No.1 to 5 and their sister, Smt. Seema on the other side, whereunder certain assurances have been given by the defendants No.1 to 5 and their sister to the defendant No.6 and vice versa and on the basis of the said assurances recorded in the Deed of Settlement, the plaintiffs do not have any objection to the suit being disposed of in terms of the Deed of Settlement.

3. Counsels for the defendant No.1 to 5 and the defendant No.6 state that their clients shall remain bound to each other in terms of the obligations undertaken by them respectively and recorded in the Deed of Settlement dated 14.11.2014 and they do not have any objection to the suit being disposed of in terms of the said settlement.

4. In view of the submission made by the counsel for the plaintiffs that though his clients are not parties to the Deed of Settlement, they are satisfied with the terms and conditions of the settlement arrived at between the defendants No.1 to 5 and their sister and the defendant No.6 and they do not wish to pursue the present suit any further, the present suit is disposed of alongwith the pending application while taking on record the Deed of Settlement and leaving the parties to bear their own expenses.

5. File be consigned to the record room. (HIMA KOHLI) FEBRUARY 05, 2015 JUDGE rkb