Delhi High Court
93,563 judgments
Abhipra Capital Ltd & Ors. v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs under Sections 406/420/409/506/120-B/34 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Chemico Manufacturers (India) Limited v. Vimal Organics Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the application to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for a Scheme of Amalgamation where all parties consented in writing under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956.
M/s. Ganges Concast Industries Limited v. M/s. Salasar Stainless Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the transferee company's application to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for a Scheme of Amalgamation involving its wholly owned subsidiary, holding that no adverse effect on creditor rights justified such dispensation.
M/s. Lifelong Finishing Academy Private Limited v. M/s. Lifelong Real Estate Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed a joint application to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for approval of a Scheme of Amalgamation among closely held companies where all such parties had given written consent.
Vikas Yadav v. State of UP
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for murder and related offences, emphasized principled sentencing under the 'rarest of rare' doctrine, affirmed appellate jurisdiction to enhance sentences, and mandated victim compensation under Section 357 CrPC.
City Palace Electronics (P) Ltd v. M/S Sony India (P) Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that goods sold on principal-to-principal basis vest ownership in the buyer, dismissed Sony's claim to repossess goods, set aside warranty-related interim directions beyond suit scope, and imposed costs on Sony for frivolous pleadings.
Kuldip Kaur v. Smt Surinder Kaur
The Delhi High Court set aside a sale deed executed in violation of an injunction order, holding such transactions null and void and emphasizing the court's power to enforce its orders.
Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/S Kuber Mutual Benefit Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT’s ruling that one-time financing charges are not interest under the Interest Tax Act, dismissing the tax department’s appeal.
M/S PROLATIVE ESTATE PVT LTD v. M/S INDIAN GROUP REAL ESTATE & ORS
The Delhi High Court decreed recovery of Rs. 22,60,000 with interest in favour of the plaintiff for advance paid for land not delivered by defendants who failed to appear and whose cheques were dishonoured.
M/S SAI INTERNATIONAL v. M/S KAIZER & ORS.
The Delhi High Court recorded and enforced a settlement agreement with additional terms, ordered release of title deeds, disposed of the suit, and granted partial court fees refund under Section 16-A of the Court Fees Act.
Munni Begum (Deceased) Thr Her Legal Heirs v. Jagbir Singh Yadav & Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld rejection of a suit for declaration and injunction for failure to claim possession, emphasizing the necessity to claim possession along with declaration when dispossessed.
Harish Chand v. Mukesh Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction without trial based on undisputed oral family settlement and bona fide requirement, emphasizing that tenants must prima facie substantiate defenses at the leave to defend stage under Section 25-B of the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Sandeep v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant in a murder case due to failure of the prosecution to establish a complete and conclusive chain of circumstantial evidence beyond reasonable doubt.
Commissioner of Central Excise v. M/S Modern Industrial Enterprises
The Delhi High Court upheld the Commissioner's jurisdiction under Section 38A but remanded the case for reassessment of duty liability without proportional apportionment in a clandestine removal dispute.
Orix Auto Infrastructure Services Ltd. v. Commissioner, DVAT, Delhi & Ors
The Delhi High Court reserved and later pronounced judgment on sales tax appeals filed by Orix Auto Infrastructure Services Ltd. against the Commissioner of DVAT concerning tax assessments.
M/S BHATIA INDUSTRIES & OTHERS v. M/S PANDEY INDUSTRIES & OTHERS
The Delhi High Court decreed the plaintiff's trademark suit based on the defendants' admission of non-use and withdrawal of their suit.
Dwarkadhis Projects (P) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax-IV
The Delhi High Court held that income tax assessments cannot be transferred under Section 127 without prior communication of reasons to the assessee, ensuring an opportunity to object, and set aside the transfer order for non-compliance with natural justice.
Kamla Singhavi v. New Delhi Municipal Council
The Delhi High Court directed reassessment and refund of excess property tax paid under mistake, applying the principle that tax paid under ignorance of law must be refunded.
Vijay Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail applications in a groundwater theft case due to lack of concrete evidence and absence of arrest or charge-sheet against the applicants.
Inderjeet v. The State (GNCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to two senior citizen petitioners accused of harassment and molestation, observing the allegations appeared motivated and imposing conditions to ensure investigation and protection of the complainant.