Delhi High Court
93,877 judgments
Davinder Kumar Chadha & Anr. v. Pushpa Rani Sahani
The Delhi High Court granted leave to defend in an eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that prima facie material raised triable issues regarding bona fide requirement and alternative accommodation.
Suresh Kumar Kaushik v. Raj Bala & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging eviction under the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that the petitioner failed to establish concealment of facts or a triable issue warranting leave to defend.
Sajjan Kumar and Ors. v. UOI and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that seizure of title documents without following the procedural safeguards under Section 28BA of the Customs Act is unlawful and ordered their release to the petitioners.
M/S. A M ENTERPRISES v. ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER
Delhi High Court restrained coercive recovery measures against petitioner pending hearing of statutory appeal stalled due to vacancy of Appellate Tribunal Presiding Officer under EPF Act.
M/S SHREE KRISHNA KESHAV LABORATORIES LIMITED v. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER
The Delhi High Court restrained coercive recovery measures against the petitioner pending hearing of a statutory appeal that could not be heard due to non-appointment of the Appellate Tribunal's Presiding Officer.
M/S WORSHIP IMPEX PVT. LTD v. MANORANJANA SINH
The Delhi High Court set aside the CLB's interim order directing investigation into a non-subject company under section 247(1A) without hearing, holding such powers are limited to the company subject matter of proceedings and must be exercised with due process.
JINDAL STEEL & POWER LIMITED & ANOTHER v. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
The Delhi High Court quashed the change of end-use and amalgamation of certain coal blocks, directing reconsideration based on proper criteria and legislative intent including inclusion of captive power generation.
Manish v. State (GNCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking concurrent sentences in two FIRs, holding that imprisonment in default of fine cannot run concurrently and applying the single transaction rule.
Rajiv Malhotra v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking quashing of an FIR based on a mediated settlement agreement due to factual disputes and the filing of a charge-sheet, holding that such matters cannot be resolved under Section 482 CrPC at the quashing stage.
Rajiv Malhotra v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking quashing of an FIR based on a disputed mediated settlement agreement after a charge-sheet was filed, holding that such matters require evidentiary adjudication and cannot be summarily quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Commissioner of Income Tax –II v. M/S Micron Steels Pvt. Ltd.
Assessment orders framed against a company dissolved by amalgamation are void and cannot be cured by Section 292B, requiring proceedings against the transferee company.
Mohan S Lakhani v. Income Tax Officer & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that failure to prove valid service of notice under Section 143(2) within the limitation period renders the assessment invalid, and participation under protest does not waive this right.
Sudhir Chaudhry v. State; Samir Ahluwalia v. State
The Delhi High Court held that consenting accused persons furnishing voice samples by reading incriminating text does not violate Article 20(3) protection against self-incrimination, dismissing their petitions challenging the trial court's order.
New India Assurance Co Ltd v. Chand Tara Begum and Ors.
The Delhi High Court partially allowed the insurance company's appeal by reducing the compensation awarded in a motor accident claim, holding that Transport Allowance need not be deducted beyond personal expenses and that addition for future prospects was justified despite non-permanent employment.
National Insurance Company Ltd. v. Nirmala @ Nirmal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company’s appeal, holding it liable to pay compensation as it failed to prove the insured driver’s licence was invalid or that there was a willful breach of policy conditions.
National Insurance Co Ltd v. Hoshiar Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal against the refusal to restore an appeal dismissed in default, holding that casual conduct and failure to show sufficient cause do not justify restoration under CPC.
National Insurance Company Ltd. v. Mamta Gupta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an insurer remains statutorily liable to pay third party compensation despite conscious breach of policy terms, with a right to recover from the insured.
National Insurance Company Ltd. v. Mamta Gupta & Ors.
The insurer remains statutorily liable to pay compensation to third parties despite conscious breach of insurance policy terms but can recover the amount from the insured.
M/S G.S. BERAR & CO PVT LTD. AND ANR v. M/S TRANS ASIAN INDUSTRIES EXPOSITIONS PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a contempt petition against a respondent for delayed payment of use and occupation charges upon their undertaking to pay outstanding amounts with interest and cautioned strict future compliance.
BURGER KING INDIA PVT LTD & ANR v. VISHAMBER SHEWAKRAMANI & ORS
The Delhi High Court disposed of the suit seeking an anti-suit injunction restraining defendants from initiating proceedings outside the court, allowing pending specialized proceedings to continue and binding defendants by their undertaking not to initiate further litigation.