Delhi High Court
93,877 judgments
BATOOL DAWOOD ..... Petitioner v. ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT, GOVT. OF INDIA .....
The Delhi High Court held that writ petitions challenging orders of the Appellate Tribunal under FEMA are not maintainable when a statutory appeal remedy under Section 35 of FEMA exists, and appeals arising from FERA orders filed post-FEMA are governed by FEMA provisions.
BATOOL DAWOOD ..... Petitioner v. ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT, GOVT. OF INDIA .....
The Delhi High Court held that writ petitions challenging an Appellate Tribunal order under FEMA are not maintainable when a statutory appeal remedy under Section 35 of FEMA is available, directing petitioners to approach the appropriate High Court.
Mayur Vihar v. Wajid
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's application for condonation of a 1381-day delay in filing leave to appeal, emphasizing that inordinate delay without satisfactory explanation cannot be condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
BATOOL DAWOOD ..... Petitioner v. ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT, GOVT. OF INDIA .....
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging the Appellate Tribunal's order on pre-deposit waiver, holding that appeals under FEMA are the appropriate remedy post-FERA sun-set period.
Shamsher Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi
Anticipatory bail of a police officer accused of abduction and extortion was denied due to prima facie evidence of presence at the crime scene and failure to cooperate with investigation.
Vishwanath Chugh v. Krishan Lal Chugh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an oral partition among Hindu family members prior to 1960 was valid and binding, dismissing the plaintiff's claim to a share in the suit property.
Suresh Chand Jain v. Director General
The Delhi High Court upheld the termination of a probationary employee for unsatisfactory performance as a lawful termination simpliciter, not requiring disciplinary inquiry or attracting stigma.
Naveen Dahiya v. GNCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that the 'own merit' principle for reserved category candidates must be applied at every stage of recruitment, allowing a more meritorious OBC candidate to compete against unreserved vacancies at the typing test stage.
R. Kannan v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a statutory appointee was not entitled to an actuarial allowance paid without statutory or contractual basis and allowed recovery of the illegal payments made.
Girish Babu Gupta v. Omkar Singh and Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by accepting the appellant's declared income and correctly assessing functional disability and attendant charges.
Sonia v. Vishal
The Delhi High Court upheld existing visitation rights and denied modification despite children's reluctance, granting additional visitation days to compensate for lost time.
Jai Kishan & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking quashing of FIRs under various IPC sections, holding that inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should not be exercised when an alternate efficacious remedy is available before the trial court.
Jai Kishan & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking quashing of FIRs under Section 482 Cr.P.C., holding that petitioners have an alternate efficacious remedy to raise their pleas before the trial court at the charge stage.
Gaurav Rajput & Ors. v. State of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement, reaffirming the High Court's power under Section 482 CrPC to end criminal proceedings in such cases to secure justice.
Vinod Kumar Bansal v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed state agencies to ensure accessible infrastructure and accountability for persons with disabilities, emphasizing coordinated governance and citizen participation.
Commissioner of Income Tax-TDS v. Moradabad Toll Road Company
The Delhi High Court held that proceedings under Section 201 of the Income Tax Act must be initiated within a reasonable time of four years prior to 2010 amendments, and subsequent extension of limitation periods do not apply retrospectively to revive time-barred cases.
Commissioner of Income Tax-8 v. Suzuki Motorcycle India Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's deletion of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) against Suzuki Motorcycle India Ltd., ruling that no concealment or inaccurate particulars were furnished despite rejection of claims in assessment.
Kamal Ghanshyamdas Bhatia & Ors v. Religare Finvest Ltd
The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award for violation of natural justice due to non-communication of orders and hearing dates, remanding the matter for fresh arbitration proceedings.
Commissioner of Income Tax –II v. M/S Micron Steels Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax, upholding the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's orders in favor of the respondents in income tax assessment disputes.
Commissioner of Income Tax –II v. M/S Micron Steels Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Commissioner of Income Tax's appeals, upholding the income tax assessment orders in favor of the respondent companies based on principles from a prior related decision.