Delhi High Court

93,877 judgments

Year:

PROEL S.P.A. v. M/S DELHI LIGH AND MUSIC CENTRE

27 Feb 2015 · Hima Kohli · 2015:DHC:1896

The Delhi High Court recorded a voluntary settlement reached through court annexed mediation as a decree and granted a refund of court fees under Section 16 of the Court Fees Act.

civil appeal_allowed settlement agreement court annexed mediation court fees refund Section 16 Court Fees Act

Eyeon Software Inc v. K Anburaja & Anr

27 Feb 2015 · Hima Kohli · 2015:DHC:1895

The Delhi High Court recorded and decreed a civil suit based on a voluntary settlement agreement between the plaintiff and defendant, deleting one defendant from the suit and disposing of the matter accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed settlement agreement decree deletion of party voluntary settlement

CIT-1 v. Alcatel Lucent Enterprise

27 Feb 2015 · S. Ravindra Bhat; R.K. Gauba · 2015:DHC:1917-DB

The document is a listing of connected ITA appeals involving CIT and Alcatel Lucent entities decided by the Delhi High Court on 27th February 2015, without substantive judgment text.

other other

Commissioner of Income Tax-8 v. Soyuz Industrial Resources Ltd.

27 Feb 2015 · S. Ravindra Bhat; R.K. Gauba · 2015:DHC:1916-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld that reassessment notices issued beyond four years require sanction by the Joint Commissioner under Section 151(2), and sanction by other authorities is invalid, rendering reassessment proceedings without jurisdiction.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 151 sanction Section 148 notice Reassessment proceedings Jurisdictional defect

CIT v. Alcatel Lucent Canada

27 Feb 2015 · S. Ravindra Bhat; R.K. Gauba · 2015:DHC:1915-DB

The Delhi High Court held that income from supply of software embedded in hardware does not constitute royalty under Indian tax law or DTAAs and dismissed the Revenue's appeal.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant royalty embedded software hardware Income Tax Act 1961

Muhammad Khan & Anr. v. Bishan Chand & Ors.

27 Feb 2015 · G. P. Mittal · 2015:DHC:1914

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by applying the multiplier based on the higher age of deceased or claimants and adjusting personal expense deductions for a bachelor deceased supporting a family.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident compensation loss of dependency multiplier method personal living expenses deduction

UP State Road Transport Corporation v. Shalini & Ors.

27 Feb 2015 · G. P. Mittal · 2015:DHC:1913

The Delhi High Court partly allowed UPSRTC's appeal in a motor accident claim by reducing compensation due to lack of evidence on deceased's income and future prospects, while affirming negligence and vehicle involvement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation loss of dependency future prospects

Sunder Lal v. Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan

27 Feb 2015 · Kailash Gambhir; I.S. Mehta · 2015:DHC:1933-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging delayed removal from service due to prolonged unauthorized absence, holding that delay and procedural lapses do not entitle reinstatement when the employee remains absent without explanation.

administrative petition_dismissed unauthorized absence writ jurisdiction service termination delay in removal

CIT-1 v. Alcatel Lucent Enterprise

27 Feb 2015 · S. Ravindra Bhat; R.K. Gauba · 2015:DHC:1932-DB

The document is an index page listing multiple connected Income Tax Appeals involving the CIT and various Alcatel Lucent entities, with no substantive judgment text provided.

other

Mohd. Jaffar Ali @ Baba v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

27 Feb 2015 · S.P. Garg · 2015:DHC:1931

The Delhi High Court upheld conviction under Sections 363 and 366 IPC for kidnapping a minor girl, affirmed acquittal under Section 376 IPC due to consent and age, and granted leniency in sentencing considering custody period and conduct.

criminal appeal_dismissed kidnapping minor consent Section 363 IPC Section 366 IPC

Ravinder Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi

27 Feb 2015 · S. P. Garg · 2015:DHC:1930

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant in a rape and abduction case due to lack of corroboration and improbability of the prosecutrix's testimony, emphasizing the necessity of reliable evidence for conviction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant abduction rape prosecutrix testimony corroboration

Nexus Design Project Pvt. Ltd. v. Travel Foods Services (Delhi Terminal 3) Pvt. Ltd.

27 Feb 2015 · S. Muralidhar · 2015:DHC:1894
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed a Section 11 petition for appointment of arbitrator due to an exclusive jurisdiction clause conferring jurisdiction on Mumbai courts over arbitration matters.

arbitration petition_dismissed Significant exclusive jurisdiction clause Section 11 Arbitration Act appointment of arbitrator arbitration proceedings

R.N. Zutshi v. The Commissioner of Customs

27 Feb 2015 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Vipin Sanghi · 2015:DHC:1872-DB

State of NCT of Delhi v. Arvind Kumar Jaiswal & Ors.

27 Feb 2015 · Sanjiv Khanna; R. S. Endlaw · 2015:DHC:1893-DB

The Delhi High Court granted leave to appeal against Arvind Kumar for further examination of prosecution discrepancies but declined leave against co-accused Pramod Kumar and Sohan Singh due to material contradictions and lack of credible evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant disclosure statement benefit of doubt Section 27 Indian Evidence Act recovery of dead body

PROEL S.P.A. v. PINE CREEK TECH INC.

27 Feb 2015 · Hima Kohli · 2015:DHC:1898

The Delhi High Court decreed a suit based on a court-mediated settlement and granted a refund of court fees under Section 16 of the Court Fees Act as the settlement was reached before evidence was recorded.

civil appeal_allowed settlement agreement court-annexed mediation court fees refund Section 16 Court Fees Act

Ahileshwar Dayal Bhargava v. State of Delhi & Anr

27 Feb 2015 · Vipin Sanghi · 2015:DHC:11805

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking transfer of cheque bounce cases, holding that once the stage under Section 145(2) NI Act is crossed, jurisdiction is fixed and transfer on the ground of place of dishonour is not permissible.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 NI Act Section 145(2) NI Act jurisdiction

2015:DHC:11075 Hem Kumar,Advocate for DDA in item no.50 v. R-2 in item no.50

27 Feb 2015 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2015:DHC:11075

The Delhi High Court directed constitution and functioning of the Town Vending Committee under the Street Vendors Act, 2014, holding it as the proper forum to adjudicate street vendors' rights and allowed petitioners to file representations before it while denying interim eviction.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Street Vendors Act 2014 Section 3(3) Town Vending Committee street vendors

Ishwar Singh v. Union of India; Ram Kumar v. Union of India

27 Feb 2015 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2015:DHC:10933-DB

The Delhi High Court held that departmental penalties for negligence can stand despite criminal acquittal, affirming the independence of disciplinary proceedings from criminal trials.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant departmental inquiry gross negligence railway property theft compulsory retirement

MS Anuradha Singh v. MS Smita Arora & Anr

27 Feb 2015 · Vipin Sanghi · 2015:DHC:10932

The Delhi High Court dismissed two criminal appeals as withdrawn after the parties settled their disputes amicably during the pendency of the appeals.

criminal appeal_dismissed appeal compromise settlement dismissal

Naushadm @ Shaji v. Govt NCT of Delhi & Anr

27 Feb 2015 · Manmohan Singh · 2015:DHC:10700

The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs under Section 307 IPC on the ground of compromise between parties, directing petitioners to deposit a sum with the Mediation Centre as a condition.

criminal appeal_allowed Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR compromise Section 307 IPC