Delhi High Court
93,877 judgments
Gaurav Jain v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a copyright infringement FIR based on amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Pardeep & Ors. v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under the Delhi Medicare Service Personnel Act based on an amicable settlement between parties, applying the principles of Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Anand Kumar Verma v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed modification of the trial court’s condition requiring a Fixed Deposit Receipt by permitting property documents as surety to secure the petitioner’s appearance.
Rohit Chauhan v. State NCT of Delhi & Ors
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC based on an amicable mediated settlement, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.
Archana Bansal & Ors. v. Directorate of Education and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the employer's discretion to pay only 50% salary arrears to the legal heirs of a reinstated employee, applying the 'No Work No Pay' principle and dismissing the claim for full back wages.
Chander Pal v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition filed after a five-year delay challenging the petitioner’s retirement on grounds of incorrect date of birth, applying the doctrine of delay and laches to bar the belated claim.
Nandu Sahani v. The State (Govt. of NCT) Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside the conviction of the appellant for kidnapping and sexual assault due to inconsistencies in the child victim's testimony and lack of corroborative medical and forensic evidence, granting him the benefit of doubt.
Ram Kawar (HUF) v. SMC Global Securities Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking quashing of complaints under Section 138 NI Act, holding that disputed factual issues cannot be decided under Section 482 CrPC and directing expeditious trial.
Ram Kawar (HUF) v. SMC Global Securities Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking quashing of complaints under Section 138 NI Act, holding that inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC should not be exercised to decide disputed facts at the pre-trial stage.
KAKA v. State, NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for pre-arrest bail in a theft case involving breaking into a house and locker, holding that the petitioner was not entitled to bail given the facts and seriousness of the offence.
Praveen Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 457 and 380 IPC on the basis of a compromise deed and settlement between the parties, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Ganesh Babu Gupta v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR under Section 420 IPC as premature since the investigation was pending and the petitioner had not complied with the settlement terms.
Varun Tibrewal & Anr v. State & Ors
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279 and 304A IPC on the basis of a mediated settlement and absence of negligence, applying Supreme Court principles on quashing criminal proceedings under Section 482 CrPC.
Dharmendra Kumar & Anr v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute based on an amicable settlement between the parties, applying the principles under Section 482 CrPC.
Vijay v. State (NCT) of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003 based on an amicable settlement and No Dues Certificate, applying the principles of inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of court process.
Sandeep Karkara v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal proceeding under Sections 406 and 498-A IPC based on an amicable settlement in a family dispute, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Government of NCT of Delhi v. S.D. Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's quashing of a pension penalty imposed on a government servant due to lack of evidence and procedural irregularities in the departmental enquiry.
Vinay Kumar v. Commissioner of Police
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition holding that the petitioner’s absence from mandatory police training due to genuine medical condition was not wilful misconduct and directed treating suspension period as duty.
Tejpal Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging dismissal from CISF service for unauthorized absence, holding that disciplinary findings and penalty were justified and not violative of natural justice.
Jagdev Sah v. Urmila Devi
The Delhi High Court set aside a Family Court order imposing litigation expenses without considering parties' financial status and directed a fresh hearing after affidavits are filed.