Delhi High Court

93,877 judgments

Year:

Vinod Kumar Pandey v. UOI & Ors.

05 Mar 2015 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2015:DHC:2173-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a government servant’s resignation and transfer are subject to departmental policies and consent, dismissing the petitioner’s writ seeking discharge from GREF to join State service.

administrative petition_dismissed technical resignation government servant departmental policy service rules

Rekha Sharma v. Central Bureau of Investigation

05 Mar 2015 · Siddharth Mridul · 2015:DHC:2172-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld convictions of multiple appellants including political and bureaucratic figures for conspiracy and corruption in the manipulation of JBT teacher recruitment award lists in Haryana.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Forgery Conspiracy Prevention of Corruption Act JBT teacher recruitment scam

Rekha Sharma v. Central Bureau of Investigation

05 Mar 2015 · Siddharth Mridul · 2015:DHC:2171-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld convictions of political and bureaucratic appellants for conspiracy, forgery, cheating, and criminal misconduct in the Haryana JBT teacher recruitment scam involving forged award lists.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Forgery Cheating Criminal Misconduct Prevention of Corruption Act

Rekha Sharma v. Central Bureau of Investigation

05 Mar 2015 · Siddharth Mridul · 2015:DHC:2170-DB

Delhi High Court upheld convictions of political leaders and bureaucrats for conspiring to forge recruitment award lists in Haryana JBT teacher scam, affirming offences under IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant JBT teacher recruitment scam forgery criminal conspiracy prevention of corruption

Rekha Sharma v. Central Bureau of Investigation

05 Mar 2015 · Siddharth Mridul · 2015:DHC:2169-DB

Delhi High Court upheld convictions of politicians and bureaucrats in a large-scale JBT teacher recruitment scam involving forged award lists and criminal conspiracy under IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant JBT teacher recruitment scam Forgery of award lists Criminal conspiracy Prevention of Corruption Act

Rekha Sharma v. Central Bureau of Investigation

05 Mar 2015 · Siddharth Mridul · 2015:DHC:2168-DB

Delhi High Court upheld convictions of politicians and bureaucrats for conspiring to forge and implement fake award lists in Haryana JBT teacher recruitment, affirming offences under IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Forgery Cheating Criminal Misconduct Prevention of Corruption Act

Rekha Sharma v. Central Bureau of Investigation

05 Mar 2015 · Siddharth Mridul · 2015:DHC:2167-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld convictions of multiple public servants and politicians for conspiring to forge recruitment award lists in a large-scale JBT teachers recruitment scam under IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Forgery Conspiracy Prevention of Corruption Act Recruitment Scam

Rekha Sharma v. Central Bureau of Investigation

05 Mar 2015 · Siddharth Mridul · 2015:DHC:2166-DB

Delhi High Court upheld convictions of political and bureaucratic appellants for conspiracy and forgery in manipulation of JBT teacher recruitment award lists under IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Forgery Conspiracy Prevention of Corruption Act JBT teacher recruitment

Rekha Sharma v. Central Bureau of Investigation

05 Mar 2015 · Siddharth Mridul · 2015:DHC:2165-DB

Delhi High Court upheld convictions of political and bureaucratic accused for conspiring to forge and replace genuine recruitment award lists with fake ones in Haryana JBT teacher scam, affirming offences under IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant JBT teacher recruitment scam forgery of award lists criminal conspiracy Prevention of Corruption Act

Maan Singh v. State

05 Mar 2015 · S.P. Garg · 2015:DHC:2216

The Delhi High Court affirmed the appellant's conviction for sexual assault but modified the sentence to the period already undergone in custody considering mitigating factors.

criminal sentence_modified Section 376 IPC sexual assault sentence modification mitigating circumstances

M/S. DMG CONSULTING PVT. LIMITED v. TELECOMMUNICATION CONSULTANTS INDIA LIMITED

05 Mar 2015 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2015:DHC:2209

The Delhi High Court held that the appointment of an arbitrator communicated after filing a Section 11(6) petition is valid absent any challenge to the arbitrator's impartiality, dismissing the petition seeking appointment of an independent arbitrator.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Section 11(6) Arbitration and Conciliation Act appointment of arbitrator communication of appointment independence and impartiality

Bhagwan Singh Verma v. Rajender Singh & Anr

05 Mar 2015 · Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:2208

The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of a tenant for second rent default, holding that failure to deposit rent under Section 27 after landlord's refusal disentitles the tenant from protection under Section 14(2) of the Delhi Rent Control Act.

property petition_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(2) Section 27 rent default

Hem Singh v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

05 Mar 2015 · P. S. Teji · 2015:DHC:2207

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction for rash and negligent driving causing death and injury but modified the sentence considering the long delay in trial.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rash and negligent driving injured witness testimony Section 279 IPC Section 337 IPC

Vinod Kumar v. State

05 Mar 2015 · P.S. Teji · 2015:DHC:2206

The Delhi High Court upheld the petitioner's conviction for cheating by personation under Section 419 IPC but set aside forgery-related convictions due to lack of proof, modifying the sentence considering the prolonged trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant cheating by personation Section 419 IPC forgery Section 468 IPC

Devender Kumar v. GNCT of Delhi and Anr.

05 Mar 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:2210

The Delhi High Court cancelled a fraudulent flat allotment obtained by impersonation and directed allotment to the rightful legal heir under the Punjab Migrants Housing Scheme.

property petition_allowed Significant fraudulent allotment impersonation housing scheme Punjab migrants

JAYASWAL NECO INDUSTRIES LTD v. UOI AND ANR

05 Mar 2015 · BADAR DURREZ AHMED; SANJEEV SACHDEVA · 2015:DHC:2176-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the rejection of the petitioner's technical bid was unjustified as the pellet plant's coal requirement was wrongly excluded, allowing the petitioner to participate as a technically qualified bidder.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant technical bid rejection coal requirement assessment pellet plant coal consumption tender evaluation norms

Medha Nath v. Manu Nath & Ors.

04 Mar 2015 · Hima Kohli · 2015:DHC:2089

The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff to withdraw the suit with liberty to file an indigent petition for the same cause of action and dismissed the suit as withdrawn.

civil appeal_dismissed withdrawal of suit leave to withdraw indigent petition cause of action

Golam Biswas v. Union of India and Another

04 Mar 2015 · Sanjiv Khanna; Ashutosh Kumar · 2015:DHC:2098-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of two linked COFEPOSA detention orders against the petitioner, rejecting challenges on procedural and substantive grounds including representation consideration and document translation.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Preventive Detention COFEPOSA Act Detention Order Article 22(5) Constitution of India

Surbhi Khanna v. Amit Khanna

04 Mar 2015 · Kailash Gambhir; I.S. Mehta · 2015:DHC:2140-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a Family Court has jurisdiction under Section 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act to order the return of a minor's custody from where the child was illegally removed, not just based on the minor's ordinary residence.

family appeal_allowed Significant Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 Section 25 custody of minor territorial jurisdiction

Union of India and Anr. v. Shiv Kumar

04 Mar 2015 · Kailash Gambhir; I.S. Mehta · 2015:DHC:2138-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal's order exonerating a railway employee from negligence charges, holding that inquiry findings unsupported by evidence and absence of malafide justify interference.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disciplinary inquiry malafide intention railway employee negligence administrative tribunal