Delhi High Court
82,660 judgments
Rajesh Khanna v. Deputy Labour Commissioner South and Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to file returns and objections regarding cess liability under the Building and Other Construction Worker's Welfare Cess Act, 1996, and ordered the authorities to decide the matter after due opportunity, emphasizing adherence to procedural requirements before coercive recovery.
Smt. Satish Kanta Sethi v. Sh. Vijay Kathura & Ors.
The Delhi High Court decreed a civil suit based on a voluntarily executed settlement agreement reached through mediation, confirming its binding and enforceable nature.
Defence Public School v. NCT Govt of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of a school running on government-acquired land, holding that unauthorized constructions post-acquisition and after the regularization cut-off date are not entitled to protection from demolition.
M/S ARESKO RESTAURANT PVT LTD & ANR v. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS
The Delhi High Court held that NDMC had absolute discretion not to renew a restaurant licence post expiry, validating its decision to auction the premises and denying specific performance to the licensee.
Ashok Kumar Verma & Ors. v. Container Corporation of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking interim protection against termination of contract labour pending adjudication under the CLRA Act, holding that such factual disputes must be resolved by the appropriate industrial authority.
Sushma Jain v. State
The High Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution due to the petitioner’s failure to appear or be represented on multiple hearing dates.
M/S SARASWATI OFFEST PRINTERS PVT. LTD v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging disqualification from a government tender for lack of requisite experience in printing secret documents as per the stipulated pre-qualification criteria.
Srikrishan v. State (Govt of NCT Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed quashing of a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Dinesh Kumar @ Dinesh v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323 and 324 IPC based on the parties' reconciliation in a matrimonial dispute, emphasizing the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and serve justice.
Rinku Kumar Singh v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 406 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, reaffirming the High Court's inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Shakeel Ahmed & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC based on a mediated settlement, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.
Amit Bhatia & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement, applying the principles of inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Rajender Kumar Sangwan & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 on the basis of amicable settlement and absence of essential ingredients of the offence, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Sanjay Dass & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking quashing of FIRs under Sections 307/34 and 308/34 IPC, holding that serious offences involving premeditated violence cannot be quashed merely on compromise.
Sanjay Dass & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking quashing of FIRs under Sections 307/34 and 308/34 IPC, holding that serious offences involving premeditated injury cannot be quashed merely on the basis of compromise.
Yakub & Ors. v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR under Section 376 IPC and POCSO Act, holding that serious offences cannot be quashed on the basis of compromise.
Rajneesh Sharma & Ors. v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a genuine amicable settlement in a matrimonial dispute, reaffirming the cautious exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Satish Kumar & Ors. v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 420 and 468 IPC based on an amicable settlement between business associates, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process in non-heinous offences.
Dr. Naresh Gupta & Ors. v. Union of India and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the closure of counselling and seat allotment process for AFMS postgraduate seats, holding that counselling may close before the last prescribed date and admitted candidates cannot change streams.
Delhi Transport Corporation v. Ashok Kumar
The Delhi High Court judgment in W.P.(C) 15508/2006 refers to an earlier decision for detailed reasoning without providing substantive findings in the present text.