Delhi High Court
82,660 judgments
Mr. P. Roychaudhuri v. MIS GREYSHAM & CO.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the ITAT's order restricting addition under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act to the outstanding liability amount after verifying supplier genuineness and gross profit rate.
Faneesh Prasad Shrivastava v. Sagrika Das Gupta & Ors.
The High Court dismissed the petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., holding that the statutory bar on second revision petitions under Section 397(3) Cr.P.C. cannot be bypassed by invoking inherent powers, and upheld the trial and revisional courts' discretion to decline police investigation under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C.
E-Procurement Technologies Pvt Ltd v. M/s C-1, India Pvt Ltd & Anr
The Delhi High Court set aside an interim injunction restraining use of e-tendering software, holding that without a prima facie comparison showing similarity, copyright infringement cannot be presumed.
Ram Karan v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings against the petitioner in a motor vehicle death case based on a mediated settlement and absence of culpable negligence, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Gyatri Devi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the insurer's appeal to recover compensation paid due to the insured owner's willful breach of policy terms by permitting a driver with a forged licence to drive the vehicle.
Shri Lalit Prasad v. The Managing Director, Food Corporation of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed a delayed writ petition challenging departmental disciplinary orders against an FCI employee, holding that delay barred the petition and that the disciplinary findings were not grossly perverse.
Jai Kishan Goel & Another v. Lt. Governor-Cum-Administrator, GNCT of Delhi & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years before the 2013 Act's commencement.
Ashok Thapar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession is not taken and compensation is not paid or offered, and that deposit of compensation in treasury without possession does not prevent lapse.
Phool Kumar & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession is not taken and compensation is not paid or tendered within five years, and mere deposit of compensation in the treasury without possession does not prevent lapse.
M. Salim v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act where possession was not taken and compensation not paid within five years of the award are deemed lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.
M/S IMPRESS ESTATES (P) LTD v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, which have not resulted in possession or compensation payment for over five years before the 2013 Act, are deemed lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.
Rajaram & Ors v. Union of India and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act without possession or compensation for over five years before the 2013 Act are deemed lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.
M/S CLEAR WATER & ANR v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse if compensation is unpaid for over five years, and that amendments introduced by later ordinances cannot retrospectively affect vested rights under the 2013 Act.
Prem Kumar Bansal v. Ambrish Garg
The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for specific performance holding that the original agreement was novated by a subsequent sale deed and that a collaboration agreement involving continuous duties is not specifically enforceable under the Specific Relief Act.
Prem Kumar Bansal v. Ambrish Garg
The Delhi High Court held that a collaboration agreement was novated and superseded by a subsequent sale deed, rendering it unenforceable, and dismissed the suit for specific performance due to lack of readiness and willingness and the non-enforceability of continuous duty contracts.
Hira Lal Bhat v. Chairman and Managing Director BSNL and Ors.
Delhi High Court held that emergency medical treatment expenses incurred by a government employee in a non-empanelled hospital must be fully reimbursed, overruling the Tribunal's denial and emphasizing the binding nature of Emergency Certificates.
Administrator General Sanjay Dewan v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held forged Sale Deeds and Will invalid, declared the Plaintiff as rightful owner of disputed properties, and ordered cancellation of illegal mutations.
Delhi Transport Corporation & Anr. v. Navjyot Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the negligence finding against the DTC bus driver, recalculated compensation based on credible income evidence, and allowed the appeal in part by reducing the awarded amount while confirming interest and apportionment.
N.K. Tripathi v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal's order denying retrospective benefit of the old pension scheme to a re-deployed employee, holding that past service prior to redeployment does not count for pension benefits under CCS Redeployment Rules, 1990.