Sushma Jain v. State

Delhi High Court · 10 Apr 2015 · 2015:DHC:3258
Hima Kohli
TEST.CAS. 25/2011
2015:DHC:3258
other petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The High Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution due to the petitioner’s failure to appear or be represented on multiple hearing dates.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
TEST.CAS. 25/2011
SUSHMA JAIN ..... Petitioner
Through : None.
VERSUS
STATE ..... Respondent
Through : Defendant ex parte.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI O R D E R 10.04.2015
JUDGMENT

1. The petitioner has remained unrepresented for the last two dates, i.e., on 22.8.2014 and 10.10.2014. Same is the position even today.

2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the present petition, which is accordingly dismissed in default and for nonprosecution. I.A. No.14594/2012 This application has already been disposed of, vide order dated 29.11.2014. Registry is directed not to show the same as pending in the cause list. HIMA KOHLI, J APRIL 10, 2015 sk