Delhi High Court
81,561 judgments
Sri Sharada Institute of Indian Management-Research v. Rakhee Nandwana Bohra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for failure to produce evidence within the time granted under Order 17 Rule 3 CPC, affirming the court's power to decide the suit despite such default and upholding the validity of an order altered before signing.
Dawood Ahmad Dar v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court directed the passport authority to conduct an enquiry to determine the correct date of birth before re-issuing the petitioner's daughter's passport.
Deepshikha v. Medical Council of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld MCI Regulations restricting medical admission reservations to persons with locomotor disability of lower limbs, holding the classification reasonable and not violative of the Disabilities Act or Article 14.
STAR INDIA PVT. LTD. v. TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court directed TRAI not to be bound by impugned regulations while determining fresh tariff orders as per TDSAT directions, refusing to stay the regulations but ensuring effective compliance with judicial mandates.
ING VYSYA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. v. DALMEET SAINI & ORS.
The Delhi High Court dismissed suits for specific performance and injunction as infructuous after the plaintiff vacated the premises and surrendered possession.
Surinder Kumar Arora v. Santosh Kumar Arora
The Delhi High Court dismissed the civil suit for non-prosecution due to the plaintiff's failure to appear and prosecute the case.
Yogesh Malik v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from a property dispute based on a mediated settlement, applying the principles governing inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.
Yogesh Malik v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 342, 384, 34, and 120-B IPC based on a mediated settlement, applying principles that permit quashing in non-heinous offences to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.
Yogesh Malik v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR arising from a property dispute based on a bona fide settlement between parties, applying the principles governing quashing under Section 482 CrPC.
Mohit Wadhwa @ Mohit Kumar Wadhwa v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed interim bail to a petitioner declared proclaimed offender under Section 138 NI Act upon his bona fide efforts to comply with a Settlement Agreement and payment of part dues.
Mohd. Sharif Abbasi v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of court process.
Avnish Jain & Anr. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The High Court declined to quash proceedings under Section 138 NI Act at the summoning stage, directing petitioners to raise their pleas before the trial court at framing of Notice under Section 251 Cr.P.C.
Narain Mittal & Ors. v. State of NCT Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's summoning order, holding that contradictions in evidence and police reports cannot preclude taking cognizance if prima facie offences are disclosed.
Kapil Sahni & Ors. v. State of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498-A, 307, 323, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute based on an amicable settlement between the parties and absence of strong evidence.
Makemytrip (India) Pvt Ltd v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the return of a Section 138 NI Act complaint on territorial jurisdiction grounds, upholding the trial court’s order in line with Supreme Court precedent.
Sonal Arora & Ors. v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable mediated settlement, emphasizing the sparing exercise of inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to secure ends of justice.
Hotel Meridian Plaza & Anr. v. Employees State Insurance Corporation & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should not be exercised to quash criminal proceedings before framing of Notice under Section 251 Cr.P.C., directing petitioners to raise objections before the trial court.
Sant Dev Chauhan v. C B I
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash charges against the accused, holding that a strong suspicion based on prima facie material suffices to put an accused on trial for criminal conspiracy.
KB Watts v. Vipin Kalra
The Delhi High Court held that mere assistance by family members does not constitute subletting under Section 14(1)(b) of the DRC Act and upheld eviction on bonafide requirement grounds under Section 14(1)(e).
Food Inspector v. Vijay Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the respondent in a food adulteration case due to substantial unexplained variation between expert reports, holding that the sample was not representative and conviction could not be sustained.