Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Vineet Kumar Lakhanpal v. Naman Lakhanpal & Anr.

23 Jan 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:521-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of a contempt petition concerning virtual visitation rights by issuing procedural directions to ensure unhindered interaction between the petitioner and children, emphasizing cooperation over punitive measures.

family other contempt petition virtual visitation child custody court directions

Smt Pataso Devi v. Sh Satish Kumar & Ors

23 Jan 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:633

The Delhi High Court allowed the transposition of deceased plaintiff's daughters as plaintiffs in a partition suit, holding that the suit did not abate as the legal heirs were already parties.

civil appeal_allowed Significant partition suit transposition of parties legal heirs abatement of suit

Rita Wadhwa v. Sajiv Sarin

23 Jan 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:522-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed an appeal modifying the decree execution order to permit parties to examine inter se bids and include payment timeframes, enhancing transparency in the sale of suit property.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Local Commissioner inter se bidding property sale Order XXI CPC

Dr. Snehashish Bhattacharya & Ors. v. South Asian University

23 Jan 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:469

The Delhi High Court held that the South Asian University, as an intergovernmental international organization enjoying immunity under the UN Act, is not amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226, and the petitioners must exhaust the Arbitral Tribunal remedy.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant South Asian University intergovernmental organization writ jurisdiction Article 12 Constitution

Y. Krishnasamy v. Chairman & Managing Director Bharat Heavy Electrical Ltd. and Ors.

23 Jan 2024 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:462

The Delhi High Court held that the exclusion of pre-2007 BHEL retirees from the contributory pension scheme is constitutionally valid, distinguishing the Supreme Court’s D.S. Nakara ruling as inapplicable to CPSE pension schemes governed by separate rules and government OMs.

labor petition_dismissed Significant Pension Scheme BHEL Employees’ Pension Scheme D.S. Nakara Article 14

Reeta Devi v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

23 Jan 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:524-DB

The Delhi High Court directed regular monitoring and reporting of the police investigation into the petitioner’s missing minor daughter under Section 363 IPC, ensuring prompt communication of any developments.

criminal other Habeas Corpus Missing Minor Section 363 IPC Police Investigation

Meena v. The State

23 Jan 2024 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:483
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Anticipatory bail was denied in a commercial quantity NDPS case where the accused was implicated through co-accused's disclosure and corroborative evidence necessitating custodial interrogation.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail NDPS Act commercial quantity disclosure statement

Union of India v. N.K. Mishra

23 Jan 2024 · Rekha Palli; Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2024:DHC:516-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing grant of actual upgraded pay scale benefits from 01.01.1996 to employees based on 5th CPC recommendations, dismissing the Government's challenge.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant 5th Central Pay Commission upgraded pay scale notional fixation actual benefits

Sunil Kumar and Ors. v. UOI and Ors.

23 Jan 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:464-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the denial of Grade Pay of ₹2,000/- to Delhi Police Multi-Tasking Staff, ruling that non-combatised personnel are not entitled to pay parity with combatised CPMF 'Followers' under the 6th CPC recommendations.

service_law petition_dismissed Significant Grade Pay 6th Central Pay Commission Equal Pay for Equal Work Combatisation

Nakhat Singh v. Union of India & Ors.

23 Jan 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:463-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's dismissal of the petitioner's claim for discharge and NOC due to failure to comply with mandatory procedural requirements under Air Force Order 33/2017.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Air Force Order 33/2017 Skill Grade eligibility No Objection Certificate Discharge from service

Rajesh Dua v. Rajiv Goyal & Anr.

23 Jan 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh

The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court’s orders striking off the tenant’s defense for non-payment of rent and restricting cross-examination to legal points, dismissing the tenant’s revision petitions under Section 115 CPC.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XVA CPC striking off defense cross-examination revisional jurisdiction

R v. The Union of India

23 Jan 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:482

The Delhi High Court recalled its earlier order permitting termination of pregnancy beyond 24 weeks in a widow suffering depression, holding that termination is impermissible without fetal abnormalities and directed delivery under medical supervision with government support.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 termination beyond 24 weeks feticide mental health and pregnancy

Arjun Mall Retail Holdings Pvt Ltd & Ors. v. Gunocen Inc.

23 Jan 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:495-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award and dismissed the appeal challenging the arbitrator's appointment and the award, emphasizing limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.

commercial appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitral Award Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 11(6)

Rajvati v. State of NCT of Delhi

23 Jan 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:508-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of the habeas corpus petition seeking production of the missing minor directing police to continue investigation and file monthly status reports before the Magistrate.

criminal petition_dismissed missing minor Section 363 IPC Habeas Corpus Article 226 Constitution

GL Sharma v. Union of India

23 Jan 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:466

The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of the petitioner’s voluntary retirement application under NTPC’s 2004 VRS scheme, affirming the employer’s discretionary power and adherence to eligibility criteria.

employment petition_dismissed Significant Voluntary Retirement Scheme Discretionary power Eligibility criteria Relaxation of service conditions

Keshav Datt v. South Asian University

23 Jan 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:460

The Delhi High Court held that the South Asian University, as an international organization enjoying immunity under the UN Act and not an instrumentality of the State, is not amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226, and the petitioner must exhaust arbitration remedies before approaching the court.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Article 12 Constitution of India Article 226 Constitution of India International organization immunity South Asian University Act 2008

Suraksha Jagirdar v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

23 Jan 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:472

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging termination of probation of a school principal appointed in violation of recruitment rules, affirming the supervisory nature of writ jurisdiction and the regulatory authority of the Directorate of Education.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant writ jurisdiction Article 226 certiorari Delhi School Education Act, 1973

Apeejay School v. Directorate of Education

23 Jan 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2013 SCC OnLine Del 3928

The Delhi High Court held that exemptions from EWS/DG/CWSN admissions must be sought student-wise within a prescribed timeframe under binding directions, rejecting the petitioner's general exemption plea and upholding the DoE's exclusive jurisdiction.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant EWS admissions DG category CWSN category seat matrix

Manish Goel v. Delhi Tourism and Transportation Development Corporation Ltd

23 Jan 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:6596
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator and referred the dispute to arbitration under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, holding that the petitioner exhausted the pre-arbitration protocol and the respondent's non-cooperation mandated judicial intervention.

other petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Section 21 pre-arbitration protocol

Staff Selection Commission v. Amit Goswami

23 Jan 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:8857-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld limited judicial interference in medical fitness decisions for police recruitment, affirming re-review medical examinations where procedural or substantive infirmities existed, while dismissing challenges to valid medical board decisions.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant judicial review medical examination recruitment discipline forces