Delhi High Court
80,351 judgments
Neeraj Agrawal v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition as not pressed, allowing the petitioner to file a review petition before the Central Administrative Tribunal without limitation objections from the respondents.
University of Delhi v. Sri Guru Tegh Bahadur Khalsa College
The Delhi High Court dismissed as withdrawn the petitions by University of Delhi challenging the minority status of certain colleges after the petitioner aligned with the Union of India and UGC supporting the minority status.
Rahul v. State (NCT Delhi); Naveen v. State (NCT Delhi)
The Delhi High Court rejected anticipatory bail applications of accused in a serious gang rape case, emphasizing the gravity of allegations and directing them to join the investigation immediately.
Harminder Singh Suri v. Amrik Singh Suri
The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral Award on grounds of vagueness, exceeding scope of reference, and patent illegality, emphasizing that Awards must be certain, complete, and within limitation.
Vinay Kumar Mehra v. Ajay Mehra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court decreed a partition suit on the basis of a bona fide compromise between the plaintiff and legal heirs of the deceased defendant, recording the settlement under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.
Brahmos Aerospace Pvt Ltd v. FIIT JEE Limited & Anr
The Delhi High Court disposed of contempt proceedings against respondents for alleged trademark infringement after they undertook to cease use of the disputed mark and allowed them liberty to seek modification of the injunction order.
The Foundry Visionmongers Ltd v. Gitanjali Sehgal & Anr
The Delhi High Court accepted a joint compromise application, decreed the suit on settlement terms, and directed a 50% refund of court fees under Section 16-A of the Court Fees Act.
Hemant Malviya v. Central Board of Secondary Education
The Delhi High Court held that CBSE must consider and decide requests for change of name in examination certificates within ten years of issuance if forwarded by the school with prescribed documents under amended bye-law 69.[1].
Babu Lal v. State Govt of NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner on the ground of parity with co-accused and the nature of injuries being simple, emphasizing cooperation with investigation.
Beena Aggarwal & Ors. v. Deepak Aswani & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the MACT's order allowing reopening of evidence without hearing the petitioners, emphasizing adherence to natural justice and directing fresh consideration with opportunity to reply and cross-examine.
Dharambir v. The State (G.N.C.T) of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction for rash and negligent driving causing death under Sections 279 and 304A IPC, modifying the sentence to the period already served and ordering compensation to the victim’s family.
Tushant v. University of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that mere loss of a single test booklet without evidence of widespread cheating is insufficient to annul a competitive examination and refused to interfere with the examining authority's decision.
Power Grid Corpn. of (I) Ltd. v. RPG Transmission Ltd.
Delhi High Court held that a valid arbitration agreement exists by operation of law and directed appointment of arbitrators to adjudicate excise duty refund disputes between Power Grid Corporation and RPG Transmission.
Videocon Industries Limited v. GAIL (India) Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act for lack of territorial jurisdiction, holding that the arbitration and exclusive jurisdiction clauses cannot confer jurisdiction where the cause of action arose outside Delhi.
Anup Kumar Gupta v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging conviction for electricity theft under Sections 39/44 of the Indian Electricity Act, upholding the modified sentence and refusing probation.
Rajesh Bajaj v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 420, 468, 471, and 34 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Tapash Kar v. State of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 420 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Ashok Kumar v. State (G.N.C.T. of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence for attempted rape of a 7-year-old child, affirming that overt acts with intent constitute an attempt under Section 511 IPC.
Harminder Singh Suri v. Amrik Singh Suri
The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitration award for vagueness and exceeding jurisdiction, holding that an award must be clear, certain, and within the scope of reference to be enforceable.
Vishesh & Anr v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 307 IPC on the basis of compromise between parties, holding that inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC permit quashing non-compoundable offences when continuation of proceedings would be futile and contrary to justice.