Delhi High Court
80,866 judgments
ICICI Bank Ltd v. M.M. Industries & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the bank's appeal and appointed an ex parte receiver to repossess a vehicle secured against a defaulted loan, authorizing its sale if dues remain unpaid.
M/S ICICI BANK LTD v. SHASHI SATYA
The Delhi High Court allowed the bank's appeal and appointed an ex parte receiver to repossess a vehicle secured against a defaulted loan, setting detailed guidelines for peaceful possession and sale.
ICICI Bank Ltd v. Rohit Kumar
The Delhi High Court allowed the bank's appeal and appointed a receiver to repossess a vehicle securing a defaulted loan, outlining procedural safeguards for repossession under Order XL Rule 1 CPC.
Sampatsinghrathore v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing the absorption of a BSF Constable into the Central Civil Accounts Service, holding that he fulfilled the eligibility criteria and was discriminated against compared to similarly situated persons.
Mr.K.Singhal, Advocate. Mr.Tanveer Khan, Advocate. STATE BHUTN STATE v. STATE NCT OF DELHI
The Delhi High Court upheld the murder convictions of four appellants under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC based on credible eyewitness testimony and common intention, but acquitted one appellant due to insufficient evidence.
Piajesh Singh v. State (NCT of Delhi)
Delhi High Court granted bail to petitioners accused in a monetary dispute-related criminal case involving allegations of assault and forgery, emphasizing their cooperation with investigation and non-interference.
Ashok Kumar & Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession is not taken and compensation is not paid or tendered within five years, and mere deposit of compensation in the treasury without possession does not prevent lapse.
Jagdeep Kaur v. Lt. Governor, National Capital Territory of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession and compensation remain unpaid for over five years, regardless of court stay orders, and that subsequent amendments are prospective and do not affect vested rights.
Dharmender Grewal v. University Grants Commission
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking re-evaluation of a NET exam OMR sheet due to the candidate’s own error in shading the wrong Test Booklet Code, holding that no legal right was infringed and the candidate could reappear in future exams.
Dipak Kumar Sharma v. U.O.I. Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the selection process for Junior Parliamentary Interpreter, holding that the recruitment was conducted transparently and in accordance with prescribed rules and minimum qualifying marks.
Director General, C.C.R.U.M., Ministry of Health, Govt. of India v. K.A.S. Azami
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition and upheld the CAT order directing the petitioner to grant pension benefits to the respondent who exercised the option to switch from CPF to GPF pension scheme, emphasizing equality and social security rights.
Abhinav Nanda v. HDFC Bank Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the recovery order, holding that the petitioner failed to prove loss due to delayed sale of pledged shares and that the bank was not obliged to issue prior notice before sale.
Premwati v. Lt. Governor, National Capital Territory of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act are deemed lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession was not taken and compensation not paid for over five years, regardless of court stay orders, and that the 2015 Ordinance proviso does not affect vested rights.
Archana Gupta v. Lt. Governor, National Capital Territory of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act are deemed lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession and compensation are not completed within five years, regardless of court stay orders, and that subsequent amendments do not affect vested rights.
DSC LTD. v. EARTHCON SYSTEM (I) PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award confirming the Arbitrator's jurisdiction over disputes referred by Court order and validated the interest awarded from the date of part payment.
Vaibhav Bhansali v. University of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that inter-college migration for the Bachelor of Management Studies course is not permissible under University of Delhi's Ordinance-IV and dismissed the petition challenging the university's rejection of such migration.
Campaign for People Participation in Development Planning v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL challenging the constitutional provisions limiting Delhi Government's powers, holding the petition politically motivated and not bona fide.
Sushil Ansal v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition filed by Sushil Ansal in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered in a related criminal case.
Deepak Kathpalia v. State & Anr.
The petition filed by Deepak Kathpalia was disposed of by the Delhi High Court by referring to a detailed common judgment delivered in a related criminal miscellaneous case.