Delhi High Court

80,866 judgments

Year:

Asha Rani v. NDMC

15 Jul 2015 · Vibhu BakhrU · 2015:DHC:5620

The Delhi High Court upheld NDMC's levy of conversion charges for changing flats in Sarojini Nagar Market from residential to commercial use, holding that such charges are distinct from leasehold to freehold conversion fees and require statutory permission.

property appeal_dismissed Significant conversion charges leasehold to freehold change of use residential to commercial

Asha Rani v. NDMC

15 Jul 2015 · Vibhu Bakhru, J · 2015:DHC:5621

The Delhi High Court held that NDMC can levy separate conversion charges for change of use from residential to commercial flats in Sarojini Nagar Market, requiring statutory permission under Section 252 of the NDMC Act, dismissing petitions challenging such charges.

property appeal_dismissed Significant conversion charges leasehold to freehold change of use residential to commercial

Asha Rani v. NDMC

15 Jul 2015 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2015:DHC:5622

NDMC can levy conversion charges for change of use from residential to commercial flats in Sarojini Nagar Market, requiring statutory permission under Section 252 NDMC Act, independent of leasehold to freehold conversion.

property appeal_dismissed Significant conversion charges leasehold to freehold change of use residential to commercial

Asha Rani v. NDMC

15 Jul 2015 · Vibhu Bakhru, J · 2015:DHC:5601

The Delhi High Court held that conversion charges for change of use from residential to commercial are distinct from leasehold to freehold conversion charges and lawfully payable under NDMC regulations.

property petition_dismissed Significant conversion charges leasehold to freehold change of use residential to commercial

Asha Rani v. NDMC

15 Jul 2015 · Vibhu Bakhru, J · 2015:DHC:5602

NDMC can lawfully levy separate conversion charges for change of use from residential to commercial flats in Sarojini Nagar Market, independent of leasehold to freehold conversion charges.

property appeal_dismissed Significant conversion charges leasehold to freehold change of use residential to commercial

Asha Rani v. NDMC

15 Jul 2015 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2015:DHC:5604

NDMC can levy separate conversion charges for change of use from residential to commercial under Section 252 of the NDMC Act despite prior conversion from leasehold to freehold at commercial rates.

property appeal_dismissed Significant conversion charges change of use leasehold to freehold New Delhi Municipal Council Act, 1994

M/S KRISHI RASAYAN EXPORTS PVT LTD v. M/S INDO -SWISS CHEMICALS LTD

15 Jul 2015 · Najmi Waziri · 2015:DHC:5647

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction restraining the defendant from using a deceptively similar trade name 'POSHAK' infringing the plaintiff's registered trademark 'PAUSHAK' for agro-chemical products.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement passing off permanent injunction trade dress

Sreenivasulu Budigi v. Union of India

15 Jul 2015 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2015:DHC:5576-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a transfer order as withdrawn, granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal with an appropriate application.

administrative appeal_dismissed writ petition Central Administrative Tribunal transfer order Articles 226 and 227

Vijay Dahiya & Anr v. Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, UOI & Anr

15 Jul 2015 · Chief Justice; J. Jayant Nath · 2015:DHC:5624-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting to consider a petitioners' representation on banning alcohol advertisements and take appropriate action, disposing of the public interest litigation without ruling on the merits.

administrative petition_dismissed public interest litigation advertisements alcohol promotion Cable Television Network Rules, 1994

Punjab & Sind Bank v. M/S Narain Dass Agencies (South)

15 Jul 2015 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2015:DHC:5626-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal's order reducing interest rate and allowing time for payment, dismissing the bank's challenge on limitation and interest grounds.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Debt Recovery Tribunal limitation pendente lite interest contractual interest

M/S PANKHURI INTERNATIONAL AND ORS v. BANK OF INDIA

15 Jul 2015 · G.S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2015:DHC:5627-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed petitioners to file a fresh detailed application for document production before the Debt Recovery Tribunal, dismissing earlier applications for lack of particulars, and disposed of the writ petition accordingly.

civil other Debt Recovery Tribunal document production interim application cross-examination

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Aman Taneja & Ors.

15 Jul 2015 · V.K. Shali · 2015:DHC:5645

The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's application for condonation of a 270-day delay in filing an appeal against a MACT award, holding that the appellant failed to demonstrate bona fide prosecution and due diligence.

civil appeal_dismissed condonation of delay bona fide prosecution Motor Accident Claims Tribunal appeal

Amit Nagpal v. State (NCT of Delhi)

15 Jul 2015 · Siddharth Mridul · 2015:DHC:5646-DB

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a serious economic offence case, emphasizing that pre-conviction detention is punitive and bail should be granted unless there is a necessity to prevent tampering or ensure trial attendance.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail economic offences pre-conviction detention personal liberty

Asha Rani v. NDMC

15 Jul 2015 · Vibhu Bakhru, J · 2015:DHC:5584

The Delhi High Court held that NDMC can lawfully levy conversion charges for changing flats in Sarojini Nagar Market from residential to commercial use, requiring statutory permission under Section 252 of the NDMC Act, distinct from leasehold to freehold conversion charges.

property appeal_dismissed Significant conversion charges leasehold to freehold change of use residential to commercial

Pradeep Kumar v. State

15 Jul 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:5591

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 304A IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement and absence of culpable negligence, applying the principles of inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 304A IPC quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement

S.N. Puri v. Rajan Kapoor & Ors.

15 Jul 2015 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:5566-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld a decree on admission in favor of plaintiff No.1 based on admissions by defendant and held that plaintiff No.2, as attorney, lacked authority to settle ownership claims, dismissing the appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant decree on admission Order XII Rule 6 CPC lease deed admission estoppel

Harjinder Singh Anand v. Daljeet Singh Anand

15 Jul 2015 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:5567-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld a partition decree declaring two brothers as joint owners of a property, rejecting fraud allegations due to lack of evidence and affirming the presumption of title under a registered conveyance deed.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant partition suit joint ownership registered conveyance deed fraud allegation

Asha Rani v. NDMC

15 Jul 2015 · Vibhu Bakhru, J · 2015:DHC:5568

The Delhi High Court held that conversion charges for change of use from residential to commercial are distinct from leasehold to freehold conversion charges and require statutory permission under Section 252 of the NDMC Act, dismissing petitions challenging such charges in Sarojini Nagar Market.

property appeal_dismissed Significant conversion charges leasehold to freehold change of use Section 252 NDMC Act

ICICI Bank Ltd v. Manjbet Kaur

14 Jul 2015 · J. R. Midha · 2015:DHC:11920

The Delhi High Court allowed the bank's appeal and appointed a receiver to repossess a vehicle securing a defaulted loan, setting procedural safeguards for peaceful possession and sale.

civil appeal_allowed Significant appointment of receiver Order XL Rule 1 CPC repossession of vehicle loan default

SICICI BANK LTD v. SOLITAIRE FOODS PVT. LTD. & ANR.

14 Jul 2015 · J. R. Midha · 2015:DHC:11919

The Delhi High Court allowed the bank's appeal and appointed a receiver ex parte to repossess a vehicle securing a defaulted loan, setting detailed safeguards for possession and sale.

civil appeal_allowed Significant appointment of receiver Order XL Rule 1 CPC loan default repossession of vehicle