Delhi High Court

81,413 judgments

Year:

GD Constable Anil v. Union of India & Ors.

21 Jul 2015 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Deepa Sharma · 2015:DHC:5842-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the lawful discharge of probationer SSB personnel under Rule 16, holding that termination based on unfitness is valid even if disciplinary proceedings were annulled.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant probationer discharge Sashastra Seema Bal Rules 2009 Summary Force Court stigmatic termination

Revenue v. Maithon Power Ltd

21 Jul 2015 · S. Muralidhar; Vibhu Bakhru · 2015:DHC:5792

The Delhi High Court held that excise duty refunds related to capital assets during the pre-commissioning phase are capital receipts reducing project cost and not taxable as business income under the Income Tax Act.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant excise duty refund capital receipt business income Section 28(iiic)

Union of India & Anr. v. M.M. Kohli

20 Jul 2015 · G.S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2015:DHC:5784-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's quashing of a penalty withholding pension on grounds of procedural irregularities and violation of natural justice due to non-supply of UPSC report before imposing punishment.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disciplinary enquiry natural justice UPSC report penalty

Jagan Nath Syal v. Commissioner of Gift Tax

20 Jul 2015 · S. Muralidhar; Vibhu Bakhru · 2015:DHC:5754-DB

The Delhi High Court held that membership of a stock exchange is a personal privilege, not a transferable asset, and thus not taxable under the Gift Tax Act when shares are gifted.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Gift Tax Act, 1958 Delhi Stock Exchange membership rights share transfer

Hasmat Bi v. The State

20 Jul 2015 · Indermeet Kaur · 2015:DHC:11236

The Delhi High Court quashed two cross FIRs arising from a petty dispute after the parties settled through mediation, imposing costs due to the advanced stage of proceedings.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR cross FIRs mediation settlement

The Commissioner of Income Tax Central-III v. PACEINDIA LIMITED

20 Jul 2015 · S. Muralidhar; Vibhu Bakhru · 2015:DHC:11039-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's order deleting disallowance of land development expenditure, holding that suspicion alone cannot justify additions without concrete evidence.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 land development expenditure disallowance suspicion vs evidence

Gyanender Singh & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

20 Jul 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:5740

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 406, 498-A, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute based on an amicable settlement and dissolution of marriage, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute settlement

Ravinder Kumar v. Delhi Transport Corporation

20 Jul 2015 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2015:DHC:5776-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the lawful termination of a probationary employee without notice or reasons under DRTA Regulations, dismissing the writ petition challenging the termination.

labor petition_dismissed Significant probationary service termination without notice Clause 9(a)(I) DRTA Regulations suppression of information

LIC Housing Finance Limited v. Mahesh Mittal & Ors.

20 Jul 2015 · Manmohan Singh, J. · 2015:DHC:5788

The Delhi High Court allowed LIC Housing Finance's suit for recovery of outstanding home loan dues against defaulting borrowers who failed to appear or defend.

civil appeal_allowed loan recovery Order XXXVII CPC default in repayment home loan

Prashant Kumar Singh v. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University & Anr.

20 Jul 2015 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2015:DHC:5785

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking intra-university migration after the permissible period, upholding university rules and the legitimacy of fee demands by a self-financing college.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant intra-university migration No Objection Certificate self-financing college fee demand university rules on migration

ULTRA HOME CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. v. PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHAUBEY & ORS.

20 Jul 2015 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2015:DHC:5748

The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for lack of territorial jurisdiction, holding that a plaintiff must file a suit where the cause of action arises and where it carries on business or has its principal office, as clarified by the Supreme Court in Indian Performing Rights Society Ltd.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant territorial jurisdiction trade mark infringement copyright infringement Section 134(2) Trade Marks Act

Manjeet Kaur Monga v. K.L. Suneja & Anr.

20 Jul 2015 · Hima Kohli · 2015:DHC:5747

The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for non-prosecution and default due to repeated failure to appear and prosecute the case.

civil appeal_dismissed non-prosecution dismissal in default failure to appear service of summons

Skol Brequeries Limited v. Ram Nath Foods & Anr.

20 Jul 2015 · Hima Kohli · 2015:DHC:5749

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the execution petition due to respondents' non-appearance, while reserving the right to initiate fresh execution proceedings.

civil petition_allowed execution proceedings withdrawal of petition non-appearance civil suit

Naresh Bhai v. Union of India & Ors.

20 Jul 2015 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2015:DHC:5777-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of a compassionate appointment claim by the younger son after an elder brother was already appointed on compassionate grounds following the father's death, affirming that only one such appointment is permissible per family under Railway rules.

administrative petition_dismissed compassionate appointment Railway employees dependency separation of parents

Nirmal Kumari Sachdeva v. Rachna Khanna & Ors.

20 Jul 2015 · Hima Kohli · 2015:DHC:5750

The Delhi High Court recorded a court-referred settlement involving cancellation of a gift deed and decreed the suit, allowing deletion of a non-essential defendant.

civil appeal_allowed settlement agreement mediation deletion of party gift deed cancellation

Raj Kumar Malhotra v. Om Prakash Malhotra & Ors.

20 Jul 2015 · Hima Kohli · 2015:DHC:5751

The Delhi High Court decreed a civil suit in terms of a court-mediated settlement and granted refund of court fees under Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870.

civil appeal_allowed Settlement Agreement Court-annexed mediation Decree on settlement Court Fees Act Section 16

Skol Breweries Ltd. v. D.D.Food Products

20 Jul 2015 · Hima Kohli · 2015:DHC:5753

The Delhi High Court disposed of an execution petition based on a joint settlement with binding undertakings acknowledging trademark rights and agreed liquidated damages.

civil other execution petition consent decree settlement undertakings

Sanjay Gaur v. Government of NCT of Delhi

20 Jul 2015 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2015:DHC:5783-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession and compensation remain pending for over five years, irrespective of court stays, and that subsequent amendments do not affect vested rights.

property petition_allowed Significant Section 24(2) RTFCTLARR Act 2013 land acquisition deeming provision statutory fiction

Master Davinder Singh & Ors. v. The Ministry of Sports & Youth Affairs, Govt. of India & Ors.

20 Jul 2015 · Ved Prakash Vaish · 2015:DHC:5743

The Delhi High Court allowed the inclusion of a standby athlete in the Indian contingent for the 14th Special Olympics World Summer Games, emphasizing adherence to the selection policy and rejecting claims of arbitrariness for other petitioners.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Special Olympics Bharat selection policy standby candidate 14th Special Olympics World Summer Games

Satish Gupta v. NCT of Delhi & Ors.

20 Jul 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:5775

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the discharge of accused in a criminal case, holding that no prima facie case was made out and the courts below rightly refrained from detailed inquiry at the charge framing stage.

criminal petition_dismissed Section 482 CrPC charge framing prima facie case discharge of accused