Delhi High Court
81,561 judgments
Anil Kumar Yadav v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and set aside the conviction under Section 376 IPC due to contradictions in the prosecutrix's testimony, unexplained delay in FIR, lack of corroborative medical evidence, and defective investigation, granting the appellant benefit of doubt.
Sher Alam v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for rape of a minor, holding that absence of hymen rupture does not negate rape and sole credible testimony of the victim suffices for conviction.
Sushila Shah v. Vaijanti Jain
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff's ex-parte suit for recovery of unpaid sale consideration and interest under registered agreements, awarding a decree for Rs.81,54,000/- with pendent lite and future interest.
Ozone Spa Private Limited v. Pure Fitness & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld an interim injunction restraining franchisees from operating a competing salon business in breach of a franchise agreement, emphasizing the enforceability of non-compete and confidentiality clauses.
Krishan & Ors. v. The Management of the Air Force School
The Delhi High Court upheld compensation in lieu of reinstatement for casual daily wage workers illegally terminated without following regular recruitment procedures.
Deepak v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 279, 337, and 304-A IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement, affirming the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice in cases of compensable offences.
Sagarika Das v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's order rejecting the petitioner's OA and remanded the matter for fresh consideration of her grievance regarding maternity leave extension under service rules.
Vikram Saini v. Bar Council of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL challenging a college's affiliation on grounds of lack of jurisdiction, applying the doctrine of forum conveniens and directing the petitioner to approach the Uttarakhand High Court.
Sardavinder Goyal v. Election Commission of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking action against alleged Model Code of Conduct violations by the ruling party during Delhi Assembly elections, holding that alternative remedies exist and the petition was not maintainable post-election.
Sukhwant Singh v. State; State v. Virender Singh
Judgment pronouncing the decision on two criminal appeals before the Delhi High Court on July 29, 2015.
Sukhwant Singh v. State; State v. Virender Singh
The Delhi High Court pronounced judgment on criminal appeals involving Sukhwant Singh and Virender Singh against the State on July 29, 2015.
Atambir Singh @ Chota Babla v. State of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions of two accused for murder and attempt to murder, set aside acquittal of the third accused, affirming their common intention and reliance on corroborated eyewitness and ballistic evidence.
Komal Sharma v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable offence FIR under Section 380 IPC based on an amicable settlement, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC while emphasizing sparing exercise of such power.
Delhi Bhartiya Chikitsa Parishad v. Ishwar Singh & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the quashing of complaint against a practitioner of Electropathy, holding that Electropathy is a recognized separate medical system exempting him from the petitioner's regulatory authority under the Delhi Bhartiya Chikitsa Parishad Act.
Upender Singh v. The State
The Delhi High Court modified the appellant's conviction from commercial to mid-quantity ganja possession due to discrepancies in weighment and inclusion of excluded parts, granting benefit of doubt and reducing sentence accordingly.
Harvansh Pandit & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a long-pending FIR under Sections 323, 342, 365, 506, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC while imposing costs for public resources consumed.
Pushkar Khanduja & Anr v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under multiple IPC sections based on an amicable settlement at the early investigation stage, applying the inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC as guided by Supreme Court precedents.
Ankur @ Vicky v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 365/506/34 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement between parties and absence of evidence, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Tuntun Singh & Anr. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal case under Sections 380/34 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between parties, emphasizing the sparing exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to secure ends of justice.
Sh. Saneh Kumar Mittal v. Ms. Sadhana Gupta
The Delhi High Court decreed a civil suit based on a court-mediated settlement and directed refund of court fees under Section 16 of the Court Fees Act.