Delhi High Court
79,582 judgments
PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5 v. LE PASSAGE TO INDIA TOURS & TRAVELS PVT. LTD
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's decision that payments to foreign agents for business advancement are not fees for technical services and no TDS is required if the recipient is not taxable in India.
Rajbir Singh Lalthwal v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed two cross FIRs registered under various IPC sections following an amicable settlement between the parties, subject to payment of costs.
Amit Sharma v. State
The Delhi High Court held that at the charge framing stage, a strong suspicion suffices to call the accused to trial under Sections 420/120B or 409/120B IPC, dismissing the petition seeking quashing of the trial order.
Syndicate Bank v. SP Mehra
The Delhi High Court held that dismissal for a technical breach of bank policy by a long-serving employee was disproportionate and upheld the quashing of the penalty, directing payment of pensionary dues.
Naveen Malhotra and Another v. The State and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed proceedings against petitioners for non-appearance due to improper service of summons at an incorrect address, emphasizing the necessity of valid service before coercive process.
Nafis Khan v. State
The Delhi High Court set aside the conviction for dowry death and cruelty due to unreliable dying declaration and insufficient prosecution evidence, granting benefit of doubt to the accused.
Dharmender Kumar v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498A, 406, 34, and 120B IPC arising from matrimonial disputes upon amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Gulshan Kumar Rana v. The State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute based on a genuine settlement and dissolution of marriage, affirming the High Court's inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to do so in such cases.
Satpal Bajaj v. Nimish Textile
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that denial of cheque issuance and signature discrepancies are to be examined at trial and do not warrant quashing at the summoning stage.
Badraan Punjabi v. State of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 500, 506, 509, and 354D IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, affirming the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to do so in non-compoundable offences where justice so requires.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-09 v. Tupperware India Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's order invalidating reassessment proceedings initiated without new tangible material and without disposing of objections by a speaking order, affirming that reopening under Section 147 requires strict compliance with procedural and substantive safeguards.
Samata v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the NEAA order and remanded the environmental appeal to the National Green Tribunal for fresh adjudication in accordance with the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010.
Naveen Malhotra and Another v. The State and Anr
The Delhi High Court set aside orders penalizing petitioners for evading summons under Section 138 NI Act due to improper service at outdated address, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural safeguards in serving summons.
Zain Chandan and Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT Delhi and Another
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, affirming the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and serve ends of justice.
Ajay Kumar Mandal v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of a major accused for rape and criminal intimidation, affirming medical board age determination and victim credibility despite minor discrepancies.
Shambhu Nath Yadav v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under the NDPS Act, ruling that procedural lapses like delayed sample dispatch and absence of public witnesses do not vitiate prosecution absent prejudice.
Dilshad v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions of appellants for murder and attempted murder based on credible eyewitness and forensic evidence, reversed acquittal of one accused, and affirmed acquittals of others due to insufficient evidence.
Naresh v. Narender Kumar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for default and non-prosecution due to the plaintiff's repeated failure to appear and prosecute the case.
VMC Systems Ltd. & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a foreign firm can be a legal entity under Indian law for filing a complaint under Section 138 NI Act, and factual disputes on holder status and limitation must be decided by the trial court, not on a quashing petition.
Sonu @ Hari Chand v. State
The Delhi High Court set aside the convictions for gang rape due to inherent infirmities in the prosecutrix's testimony and lack of corroborative evidence, emphasizing the need for reliable and consistent evidence in sexual assault cases.