Delhi High Court
79,582 judgments
Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Government's refusal to renew increased MBBS intake permission due to resident shortages exceeding regulatory limits despite withdrawal of deficiency notices.
Sachin Katyal v. University of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that candidates who have passed qualifying exams by the stipulated date but whose results are declared late cannot be denied admission on that ground and directed the University of Delhi to revise its waiting list accordingly.
M/S N.K. SECURITIES v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of tender conditions clustering schools and financial eligibility criteria, holding that judicial interference in tender matters is limited to cases of mala fide or arbitrariness.
M/S N.K. SECURITIES v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of tender conditions involving clustering and financial requirements, dismissing challenges by security agencies alleging unfair exclusion of smaller players.
M/S N.K. SECURITIES v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR
The Delhi High Court held that judicial interference in tender conditions is limited and dismissed challenges to clustering and financial requirements in a government security services tender as neither arbitrary nor mala fide.
Anees Ahmad and Ors. v. State Govt of NCT Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR registered in Delhi for offences allegedly committed outside its jurisdiction, holding that territorial jurisdiction is determined by the place of offence, not the complainant's residence.
Sumit Goel and Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute based on a genuine settlement and dissolution of marriage, affirming the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Tanwar Singh and Ors. v. The State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes upon amicable settlement between the parties, affirming the High Court's inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Jagjeet Singh & Ors. v. Sapan Preet Singh & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 420, 465, 647, 468, 471, and 120-B IPC arising from a family dispute based on a mediated settlement, emphasizing the Court's power under Section 482 CrPC to end proceedings in amicably resolved civil or family matters.
Ajay Panchal & Ors. v. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed quashing of a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement, applying the principles under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.
Azad Singh & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes on the ground of amicable settlement, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Praveen Kumar v. Shobha Devi & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that interlocutory relief beyond the scope of a possession suit concerning the ground floor cannot be granted and such observations do not prejudice the final adjudication.
Shyam Sunder Singh v. Shahin Akhtar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and condonation application, holding that penal damages under Section 74 Indian Contract Act require proof of actual loss and unexplained delay in filing appeal warrants dismissal.
Commissioner of Income Tax-XIII v. Vaish Associates
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's order allowing partners' remuneration under Section 40(b)(v) and the deduction of payments to a professional non-profit body under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, dismissing the Revenue's appeal.
SHANTI INDIA (P) LTD v. LT. GOVERNOR AND ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act are deemed lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession is not taken or compensation not paid within five years, regardless of court stays or compensation deposited in court.
Neelam Arya v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession and compensation are not completed within five years of the award.
Subhash & Ors. v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 452, 324, 427, 506, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between neighbors, emphasizing the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process in non-heinous offences.
Afsar Ali and Ors v. State and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and dissolution of marriage, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Umrao Singh v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession is not taken and compensation not paid within five years of the award.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-6 v. Minda Acoustic Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed Revenue's appeals against ITAT orders disallowing certain depreciation and expense claims, holding that the ITAT's factual findings were justified and the disputed amounts were insubstantial.