Delhi High Court
79,582 judgments
Bayer Corporation v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a compulsory licence restricting use within India does not permit export of the patented drug abroad under Section 107-A, and directed expedited disposal of the related writ petition with regulatory authorities impleaded.
Rekha Vohra Bhalla v. The State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under the Indian Electricity Act on the basis of an amicable settlement between parties at an early investigation stage, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Syed Mohd. Nadeem Alias Mohsin and Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and dissolution of marriage, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Aslam v. State (Govt. of NCT) of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court disposed of Criminal Appeal No. 796/2013 by referring to a detailed common judgment in a related appeal, without delivering a separate judgment.
M/S SHARMA KALYPSO PRIVATE LIMITED v. GOAN HOTELS & CLUBS PVT LIMITED
The Delhi High Court returned the plaint for presentation before the territorially competent Goa court, disposing of the suit and pending application accordingly.
Sunil Badolia & Ors v. State & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR based on a mediated settlement that failed to provide adequate permanent alimony to the dependent spouse.
Prof V S Ramamurthy & Anr. v. Tulsinarayan Prasad
The Delhi High Court declined to quash criminal proceedings before framing of notice under Section 251 CrPC, directing petitioners to raise objections at trial court and emphasizing the trial court's duty to apply mind at the notice framing stage.
Rajnesh v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court held that street vendors are protected from eviction under Section 3(3) of the Street Vendors Act, 2014 until a Town Vending Committee is constituted, but courts will not grant interim restraint orders without statutory verification and balancing of public interests.
Jai Vir Singh v. Delhi Transport Corporation
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a transport employee convicted for rash and negligent driving causing death, holding that no separate departmental enquiry was required when criminal conviction establishes misconduct.
Abhimanyu Pandey v. UOI and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed the dismissal of a Railway Protection Force constable who was wrongly held to have suppressed information about a criminal case that was closed prior to his appointment and ordered his reinstatement.
Rajesh Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions challenging the Indian Air Force's refusal to discharge personnel based on pay scale eligibility, holding that subsequent pay revisions cannot retrospectively qualify posts as Group 'A' for discharge purposes.
Rajesh Kumar v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that eligibility for discharge from the Indian Air Force based on pay scale criteria must be determined as per the pay scales prevailing at the time of application, and subsequent pay scale revisions cannot be considered retrospectively.
Rajesh Kumar v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that eligibility for discharge from the Indian Air Force to join bank posts depends on pay scales applicable at the time of application, and subsequent pay revisions do not alter this criterion.
Rajesh Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the Indian Air Force's refusal to discharge personnel for bank posts due to non-fulfillment of pay scale and service conditions under Air Force Order 14/2008, rejecting reliance on subsequent pay revisions.
Rajesh Kumar v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging the Indian Air Force's refusal to discharge personnel for bank posts, holding that eligibility must be determined based on pay scales prevailing at the time of application as per Air Force Order 14/2008.
Rajesh Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that eligibility for discharge from Indian Air Force service depends on the pay scale at the time of application, rejecting retrospective application of subsequent pay scale revisions by banks.
Rajesh Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions challenging the Indian Air Force's refusal to discharge personnel for bank PO posts, holding that eligibility depends on pay scales at the time of application, not subsequent revisions.
Girish Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a past censure does not permanently bar appointment through LDCE if the candidate has maintained an unblemished service record thereafter, directing the CRPF to issue the appointment letter to the petitioner.
M/S N.K. SECURITIES v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR
The Delhi High Court upheld the tender conditions for security services in government schools, ruling that judicial interference is limited unless the tender process is mala fide or arbitrary.
ANIL SHANDILYA v. B K GUPTA (HUF)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the refusal to restore a suit for specific performance, holding that the plaintiff was not continuously ready and willing to perform his contractual obligations as required under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act.