Delhi High Court
36,659 judgments
M/S A.S. Builders v. Union of India & Anr.
Delhi High Court allowed procedural relief to petitioner against GST demand orders while leaving the validity of extension notifications under Section 168A of the GST Act open pending Supreme Court decision.
Abdul Gaffar v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST demand order passed without proper notice and hearing, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of the impugned notifications to the Supreme Court.
M/S PRIME INTERGLOBE PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
The Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte GST adjudication orders due to ineffective notice via a less visible portal tab, remanding the matter for fresh hearing while leaving the validity of extension notifications to the Supreme Court.
Cristoo Arora v. Union of India and Anr
Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte GST demand order for lack of opportunity to reply, granting petitioner time to file reply and appear for hearing, while leaving validity of extension notifications to Supreme Court.
Toshniwal Electricals Pvt Ltd v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed adjudication of the petitioner's appeal on merits without limitation bar, while leaving the validity of notifications extending limitation periods under the CGST Act open pending Supreme Court's decision.
M/S GRILLED ROTI v. COMMISSIONER OF DELHI GOODS AND SERVICES TAX AND ANR.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST demand order against a petitioner denied portal access due to retrospective registration cancellation, granting time to file replies and personal hearing, while leaving the validity of limitation-extending notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
Superb Galaxy v. Commissioner of DGST
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order for violation of natural justice, granting the petitioner an opportunity to be heard, while leaving the validity of related GST notifications open pending Supreme Court adjudication.
Korea Marine Transport Co Ltd v. Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato Ward 204 & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte tax demand order for failure to consider the petitioner's detailed reply and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication with personal hearing, leaving the validity of GST notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
M/S Krishna Enterprises v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court remanded a tax adjudication matter for fresh hearing due to lack of signature and opportunity to reply, leaving the validity of GST notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
Aayushi Hygiene and Care Private Limited v. Commissioner of DGST & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order due to improper communication of the show cause notice and remanded the matter for fresh hearing, leaving the validity of related GST notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
M/S. SHUDH HOSPITALITY PRIVATE LIMITED v. GOODS AND SERVICE TAX OFFICER WARD- 44, DELHI
Delhi High Court permitted belated appeal against GST adjudication order while leaving the validity of extension notifications under judicial consideration before the Supreme Court.
Damanpreet Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order for lack of proper hearing and remanded the matter, leaving the validity of the impugned notification pending before the Supreme Court.
Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-1, New Delhi v. Genpact Services LLC
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal holding that penalty under Section 271(1)(c) cannot be imposed on a debatable issue of expenditure classification and that a vague penalty notice is invalid.
National Food and Beverages v. Commissioner Delhi Goods and Service Tax and Others
The Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte GST demand orders due to improper service of show cause notices via an obscure GST portal tab, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication with proper hearing, while leaving the validity of related GST notifications open pending Supreme Court review.
Rinkoo Aggarwal v. Gaurav Sabharwal & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is barred by limitation if filed beyond three years from a valid invocation notice, dismissing the petition for appointment of an arbitrator filed after a seven-year delay.
Sunil Kumar Meena and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court permitted the petitioners to withdraw their writ petition as it was rendered infructuous by the issuance of appointment letters.
Kashmiri Lal v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of a complaint against a police officer for lodging a false FIR, holding that prior sanction under Section 197 CrPC is mandatory and no prima facie case was made out for prosecution.
Sumitra v. Inder Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging Family Court orders directing a DNA test, holding that prior consent and voluntary submission justify such direction despite admissions on parentage.
DMI Alternatives Private Limited v. Additional Commissioner (Adjudication) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a GST demand on fund expenses, holding that contractual interpretation involving factual issues is beyond writ jurisdiction and directing the petitioner to pursue statutory appeals.
Securities and Exchange Board of India v. Vijay Laxmi
The Delhi High Court dismissed SEBI's petition seeking enhancement of sentence against Vijay Laxmi, holding that the trial court rightly considered her medical condition and trial circumstances in awarding a lenient sentence.