Delhi High Court
77,325 judgments
HRD PRIVATE ITI v. DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING AND ORS
The Delhi High Court allowed multiple writ petitions by referring to and applying the directions issued in a prior lead judgment concerning private ITIs and directed the respondents to act accordingly.
HRD PRIVATE ITI v. DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING AND ORS
The Delhi High Court allowed a batch of writ petitions filed by private ITIs by applying the directions issued in a prior lead petition judgment concerning the regulation of private ITIs.
SHS v. PUS
The High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the dismissal of the divorce petition on territorial jurisdiction grounds, and remanded the matter for merits adjudication after accepting the appellant's unimpeached evidence of residence.
Divya Suri v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a subsequent purchaser is entitled to the benefit of Section 24(2) of the 2013 Land Acquisition Act, declaring acquisition proceedings lapsed where compensation was unpaid for over five years.
Jyotsna Suri v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings pending for over five years without compensation under the 1894 Act are deemed lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, and this benefit extends to subsequent purchasers.
Keshav Suri v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is unpaid for five years, and this benefit extends to subsequent purchasers.
Jyotsna Suri v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act are deemed to have lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years, and this benefit extends to subsequent purchasers.
Springer Editorial Services Private Limited v. Springer (India) Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed a joint application to dispense with certain meetings and directed the convening of unsecured creditors' meeting for approval of a Scheme of Amalgamation under the Companies Act, 1956.
Simbhaoli Sugar Mills Limited v. Chemical Systems Technologies (India) Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and recorded a bonafide settlement under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC, staying execution of the decree subject to payment terms, with provisions for execution upon cheque dishonour.
Mukesh Lata v. Union Public Service Commission & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging UPSC's shortlisting criteria for a government post, holding that raising the benchmark based on desirable qualifications is permissible if in accordance with the advertisement and Recruitment Rules.
Ram Charan v. Ram Gopal
The Delhi High Court upheld that a consent decree transferring tenancy rights in a property does not confer ownership, and an application to modify the decree to transfer ownership was barred by res judicata.
Aas Mohd v. Renu Seth
The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal upholding possession decree for the landlord, rejecting the tenant's unregistered agreement to sell as a frivolous defence and emphasizing the necessity of specific pleadings and registered documents to claim possession.
State of Tamil Nadu v. Union of India and Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the Central Government’s order setting aside the suspension of an IPS officer who had assumed charge on central deputation, holding that the State Government lacked jurisdiction to suspend her thereafter.
Deepak Dutta @ Kanwar Lal Dutta v. Yog Raj & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the execution petition after the objector paid the decretal amount in installments secured by post-dated cheques, satisfying the decree and ending the litigation.
Ravinder Kumar & Anr v. State of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable Section 304A IPC FIR under its inherent powers in light of an amicable settlement and absence of intent, applying Supreme Court guidelines on quashing criminal proceedings.
Sanjiv Arya v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from matrimonial disputes under Sections 498-A, 323, 506, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process of law.
Saroj Gupta v. M/s Gautam Enterprises and Anr.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for illegal retrenchment where the petitioner refused reinstatement, applying Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act and awarding interest for delayed payment.
Madina v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside the order taking cognizance under Section 23 of the Juvenile Justice Act against a mother and grandmother, holding that normal familial reprimands do not amount to wilful neglect or harassment.
Yacub Kispotta & Ors. v. Director General BSF & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that dismissal of BSF personnel without a proper inquiry was unlawful, emphasizing that executive satisfaction dispensing with inquiry must be based on relevant material and is subject to judicial review.
Naresh Goel and Ors v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 420, 468, and 471 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC with conditions.