Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
TEK XPLORE THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR MS. RENUKA MAINI v. THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court set aside a cryptic tax demand order and directed fresh adjudication after granting the petitioner an opportunity to file a reply and be heard.
Jindal Films India Ltd. v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court set aside an administrative order passed without hearing by the deciding officer, directing a fresh hearing and order to uphold principles of natural justice.
Lokesh Prabhakar v. Archana Prabhakar
The High Court upheld the Family Court's order restricting the father's visitation rights to controlled settings due to the teenage daughter's refusal and apprehensions of unpleasant interactions outside court premises.
PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY v. RAAJ UNOCAL LUBRICANTS LIMITED
The Delhi High Court allowed recording of overseas witnesses' evidence via video conferencing under procedural safeguards and admitted undisputed documents in an intellectual property suit.
Neena Kapoor & Ors. v. Vishnu Khanna
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of an application to reject a plaint filed by an Interim Administrator seeking injunction, holding that disputed title and document validity issues cannot be decided at the plaint rejection stage.
M/S HARCHARAN DASS GUPTA v. AZAD HIND COOP GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the setting aside of an arbitral award for lack of evidentiary basis and reasons, affirming that awards without reasons or evidence violate Section 31(3) of the Arbitration Act and warrant interference.
Mahesh Aggarwal v. Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the Sub-Registrar to accept and process the petitioner’s sale deed documents for registration, disposing of the writ petition with procedural directions.
Kailash Mehendiratta v. Central Bank of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition, holding that an unregistered Agreement to Sell executed after a registered mortgage is inadmissible and unenforceable, and the petitioner has no legal right to the property against the secured creditor's recovery under the SARFAESI Act.
Abhijeet Ghosh v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of murder under Section 302 IPC, holding that prima facie evidence suggested the deceased was the aggressor and the fatal shooting was accidental during a scuffle.
Sony India Private Limited v. Iris Worldwide Integrated Private Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award directing payment of disputed agency fees under a revised contract, affirming acceptance by conduct and silence and dismissing the appellant's challenge under the Arbitration Act.
Virendra Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the non-revision of pension based on a separate E-9A pay scale, holding that pay fixation is a Government policy matter not subject to judicial interference.
Vikas Balguar @ Shammi v. Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to accused in a murder case due to hostile witnesses, long incarceration, and ongoing trial, emphasizing the balance between liberty and seriousness of offence.
Kanta Gupta v. Goverdhan Dass Daga LRs
The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of eviction petitions under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act due to the landlord's concealment of vital facts negating bona fide requirement, affirming limited revisional jurisdiction under Section 25B(8).
Aparna Choudhrie Kala v. Vaibhav Kala
The High Court upheld the Trial Court's grant of leave to defend in a summary suit, holding that the defendant raised substantial defence and triable issues, and that the revisional jurisdiction under Section 115 CPC does not permit reappraisal of such findings.
Senthilvelkumar v. State Through SHO & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging FIR registration, holding that prior complaints and affidavit support satisfied Section 156(3) CrPC requirements and mala fide allegations do not warrant quashing at the investigation stage.
A.K. Al Muhaidib and Sons v. Chaman Lal Sachdeva
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to remove the trademark "AL-WALIMAH" registered to respondent no.1 for non-use under Section 47 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, holding that the petitioner was a person aggrieved and the mark was not bona fide used.
Sanjay Kumar v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the GST registration cancellation order for non-filing of returns, restoring registration subject to compliance with filing and statutory rules.
Raghav Arora L/H of Sh. Gopal Kishan Arora v. GST Officer, Ward 78, Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration requires objective satisfaction and proper notice, modifying the cancellation date to the Show Cause Notice date instead of an earlier retrospective date.
Aditi Agencies v. Commissioner of CGST, Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside the retrospective cancellation of GST registration due to lack of reasons and opportunity to object, restoring the registration subject to compliance.
Dharam Bir v. Charan Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's appointment of a Local Commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 CPC to measure disputed property walls, ruling it a proper exercise of judicial discretion to elucidate factual controversies without delegating judicial functions.