Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Trans Bharat Aviation Private Limited v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal’s order on service tax classification, holding that the statutory remedy before the Supreme Court under Section 35L of the Central Excise Act, 1944 must be availed.
RANE BRAKE LINING LIMITED v. SUPERINTENDENT, RANGE-17, CENTRAL GST DIVISION & ANR.
The Delhi High Court set aside the retrospective cancellation of GST registration due to procedural infirmities and lack of objective satisfaction, restoring the petitioner's registration.
APSHARA GARMENTS PVT. LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF DELHI GOODS AND SERVICE TAX & ANR.
The Delhi High Court set aside the retrospective cancellation of GST registration due to lack of objective grounds and proper notice, restoring the petitioner's registration and remitting the amendment application for reconsideration.
DELHI POLYMERS v. COMMISSIONER, TRADE AND TAXES & ANR.
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration under Section 29(2) CGST Act requires objective satisfaction, prior notice, and reasons, and modified the cancellation to take effect from the Show Cause Notice date instead of retrospectively.
Prominent Comtech Pvt. Ltd. v. Border Security Force & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed exemption from serving mandatory notice under Section 80 CPC in a recovery suit against the government, holding that prolonged inaction by the government fulfilled the notice's objective.
Surender Kumar and Others v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Others
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition seeking additional age relaxation beyond the Government's policy, holding that contractual employees are entitled only to the one-time age relaxation granted under valid executive memorandums.
Vijay Kumar Sharma & Anr. v. State of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and charge framing under Section 376 IPC where the prosecutrix disowned the prosecution and the allegations did not prima facie constitute rape, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Sourav Narula v. Naveen Kumar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the delayed appeal against a summary decree for recovery of investment amount in a partnership dispute due to non-condonation of delay.
Pulak M. Pandey v. Indian Institute of Technology Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition challenging the dismissal of a writ petition against a sexual harassment inquiry, holding that no error apparent on record existed and that procedural and natural justice requirements were met.
Shalendra v. Chairman and Managing Director & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition challenging condonation of a 52-day delay in filing a counter affidavit, holding that the reasons constituted sufficient cause and emphasizing the limited scope of review jurisdiction.
Rajendra Prasad Goyal v. Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted probate of the last Will of Late Mr. Umashanker Goyal upon proof of due execution and authenticity by the surviving attesting witness and executor.
Virender Khanna & Associates v. Airports Authority of India
The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award that upheld a unilateral modification of consultancy fees by AAI, reaffirming that contract terms cannot be altered without mutual consent.
Suresh Kumar Sharma v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition upholding the conviction of a retired employee for unauthorized retention of a company-allotted flat under Section 630 of the Companies Act, affirming the limited scope of revisional jurisdiction.
Sachin Kumar Daksh v. Mamta Gola and Another
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's order permitting the wife to file a fresh income affidavit in maintenance proceedings, emphasizing the court's discretion to ensure truth and social justice over technicalities.
Eleventure Systems and Services Private Limited v. GAIL Gas Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the refloated tender, holding that cancellation and refloating of tenders with modified conditions is lawful, and the petitioner’s failure to disclose participation and delay warranted dismissal.
M/S ALMASS INDIA v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR.
The Delhi High Court upheld the bar under Section 69(2) of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, dismissing the suit filed by an unregistered partnership firm for recovery based on a contract, and rejected the appellant's challenge to the provision's constitutionality.
Reebok India Company v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the retrospective application of the 2016 Amendment Rules, dismissing the petitioner's challenge to the Registrar's rejection of its conversion application due to negative net worth and pending investigations.
HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURACE CO LTD v. PAPMA DAS & ORS
The Delhi High Court modified the compensation awarded in a motor accident claim by reducing future prospects to 40% and adjusting non-pecuniary damages, while upholding a 10% interest rate from petition filing till realization.
Sethi Devi & Ors. v. Central Public Works Department & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that residents of government servant quarters are not entitled to rehabilitation under the DUSIB Policy and dismissed their writ petition seeking protection against eviction.
Shyam Prakash v. Directorate of Vigilance & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking a direction for time-bound disposal of a complaint against DUSIB officers, holding that judicial interference in executive complaint disposal is unwarranted absent gross dereliction of duty.