Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
President Lala Sher Singh Memorial Jeevan Vigyan Trust Society v. Sutlej Eduvision Private Limited
The Delhi High Court held that a valid arbitration agreement existed between the parties and accordingly referred the dispute to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Shri Arun Sankhwal v. Shri Anoop Gupta & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed restoration of the suit but set aside restoration of a disposed interlocutory application treated as counter-claim, upheld discretionary allowance of fresh evidence with costs, and directed transfer of the suit to district court.
Vipin Prakash Aggarwal v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld visitation rights for a mother under the DV Act, emphasizing the need to attempt re-establishing parent-child bonds despite children's reluctance and matrimonial disputes.
Sushma Bhambari v. Taruna Juneja & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted a preliminary decree of partition for the Ashok Vihar property based on the admitted last Will, rejecting the need for probate and vague sale claims.
M/S MODI STRATFORD ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT PRIVATE LIMITED v. PUNJAB & SIND BANK
The Delhi High Court held that a dispute arising from a banking Fixed Deposit Receipt transaction qualifies as a commercial dispute under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, and allowed deletion of unnecessary parties from the suit.
Sh. Vikash & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 354A, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Dinesh Kumar & Ors. v. The State (GNCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of the court's process.
Tushar Sharma v. Shellz Techno Pack Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court quashed the summoning order under Section 138 NI Act against a petitioner not shown to be a partner or responsible person of the accused firm, holding that mere bald averments without evidence do not justify trial.
Sh. Dhani Ram Mehto v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging withholding of pension, holding that service matters fall exclusively within the Central Administrative Tribunal's jurisdiction as per the Administrative Tribunals Act and Article 323A of the Constitution.
National Highways Authority of India v. T. Suryanarayana Reddy
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award holding demonetisation as a force majeure event excusing toll payments and ruled that penalty refund claims are arbitrable despite contractual exclusions.
Arsadi Khatoon v. State
The court dismissed the habeas corpus petition seeking production of a rescued minor child engaged in child labour, directing the petitioner to approach the Child Welfare Committee for custody.
Naveen Yadav v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail to an absconder accused in a dowry death case, reaffirming that proclaimed offenders are ordinarily not entitled to anticipatory bail except in exceptional circumstances.
M/S INDOCHEM AND POLYMERS v. SALES TAX OFFICER CLASS II AVATO WARD 207 ZONE 11
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order under Section 73 for failure to consider the taxpayer’s detailed reply and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication with a personal hearing.
InterDigital Technology Corporation & Ors. v. Guangdong Oppo Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd. & Ors.
Delhi High Court directs Defendants to deposit security for patent infringement claims, refuses modification of consent order without consent, and outlines confidentiality club protocols in SEP litigation.
Rajinder Singh Bhatia v. Manju Bhatia
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned order dismissing the interlocutory application, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration due to reliance on unpleaded facts and failure to consider a registered relinquishment deed.
Sohan Lal Gupta v. The Principal DAV Public School and Anr.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition as the school granted admission to the petitioner’s daughter as an EWS student in compliance with the RTE Act and DoE procedures.
BLUSMART FLEET PVT. LTD. v. ENERGY EFFICIENCY SERVICES LTD.
The Delhi High Court appointed an independent arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to resolve a dispute under a Dry Lease agreement, directing arbitration under DIAC rules.
Simla Holdings v. The Assistant Commissioner Central Tax Division Rohini, Delhi West
The Delhi High Court held that the limitation for filing an appeal against a tax demand order begins from the date the order is uploaded on the common portal, and dismissed the writ petition for non-maintainability due to availability of an alternative remedy.
MS Babaji Bags A Proprietary Firm v. Union of India Ministry of Finance Department
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order due to defective communication of hearing notice and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after affording the petitioner an opportunity of hearing.
Ajay Bajpai v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing allotment of an alternative plot to the petitioner whose land was acquired, holding that ownership of property outside Delhi does not disqualify entitlement under the Government's policy.