Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Seema v. Management of M/s Colonel Security Chambers

29 Feb 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:1718

The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's finding of illegal termination but enhanced the compensation awarded in lieu of reinstatement, affirming the discretionary power under Section 11-A of the Industrial Disputes Act.

labor petition_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 11-A Labour Court unjustified termination

Master Hitesh Verma v. DAV Public School & Anr.

29 Feb 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:1706

A writ directing school admission can only be granted if the student has been allotted admission by the Department of Education following the prescribed computerized draw of lots under the RTE Act.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Right to Education Admission Disadvantaged Group Computerized Draw of Lots

Puran Mal Gupta v. State

29 Feb 2024 · Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:1680

The Delhi High Court held that unauthorized occupation does not amount to criminal trespass absent forcible dispossession, setting aside charges against petitioners and distinguishing civil rights from criminal liability.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant criminal trespass unauthorized occupation licensee partnership deed

M/S THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD v. SUKHPAL KAUR & ORS

29 Feb 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:1598
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court partly allowed the insurer's appeal, reducing the compensation awarded for a fatal motor accident caused by rash driving, while affirming insurer liability despite the driver's fake license.

motor_vehicles_accident_compensation appeal_partly_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 rash and negligent driving compensation quantum fake driving license

Intex Technologies India Ltd v. Rugby Renergy Pvt Ltd

29 Feb 2024 · Prateek Jalan · 2024:DHC:1606

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award dismissing specific performance claims due to void contracts for uncertain consideration, rejecting procedural and natural justice challenges by the purchaser.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 uncertainty of consideration specific performance arbitral award

Maj. Pankaj Rai v. M/S NIIT LTD

29 Feb 2024 · Prateek Jalan · 2024:DHC:1595

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award rejecting the petitioner’s claims under a license agreement, holding no grounds for interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil petition_dismissed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Accord and satisfaction Caveat emptor

Nita Puri v. Punjab National Bank

29 Feb 2024 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2024:DHC:1646
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed Punjab National Bank's order declaring the petitioner a Wilful Defaulter, holding that such classification requires independent objective findings beyond forensic audit reports.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Wilful Defaulter Review Committee Punjab National Bank Forensic Audit Report

Ratul Puri v. Bank of Baroda

29 Feb 2024 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2024:DHC:1645
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside the declaration of Ratul Puri as a Wilful Defaulter by Bank of Baroda, holding that the bank failed to independently establish intentional diversion of funds and did not comply with procedural safeguards under the RBI Master Circular.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Wilful Defaulter Master Circular on Wilful Defaulters 2015 Corporate Debt Restructuring Diversion of Funds

Ratul Puri v. Punjab National Bank

29 Feb 2024 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2024:DHC:1643
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside the declaration of Ratul Puri as a Wilful Defaulter by Punjab National Bank, holding that the bank failed to independently establish wilful default as required under the RBI Master Circular.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Wilful Defaulter RBI Master Circular Corporate Debt Restructuring Diversion of Funds

Nomil Rana v. Union of India and Ors.

29 Feb 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:1614-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld termination of a CISF probationer for suppressing a pending criminal case in his attestation form, affirming that such concealment justifies dismissal without inquiry.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant suppression of material facts attestation form termination during probation criminal case quashing

Partha Mandal v. Special Commissioner of Police Vigilance

29 Feb 2024 · Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2024:DHC:1616

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking mandamus to compel departmental enquiry against a police officer, holding no cognizable offence was made out and no enquiry was pending.

criminal petition_dismissed writ of mandamus departmental enquiry habitual litigant cognizable offence

Narinder Pal Verma v. Kamal Thapar

29 Feb 2024 · Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2024:DHC:1618
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The High Court upheld the trial court’s order closing prosecution evidence after repeated adjournments and dismissed the petition seeking recall of the complainant for cross-examination under Section 311 Cr.P.C., finding no sufficient cause to interfere under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_dismissed Section 311 Cr.P.C. Section 482 Cr.P.C. cross-examination closure of prosecution evidence

Hogar Controls India Pvt. Ltd. v. Anadasu Vijay Kumar & Ors.

29 Feb 2024 · Sanjeev Narula · 2024:DHC:1644

The Delhi High Court held that the Plaintiff owns the trademarks “HOGAR” and “HOGAR CONTROLS” under the Shareholders and Subscription Agreement and restrained Defendants from using the marks, ruling that Defendants’ claims of ownership were unfounded.

civil appeal_allowed Significant intellectual property rights trademark ownership Shareholders and Subscription Agreement passing off

Adarsh Enclave Residents Welfare Association v. Government of NCT of Delhi

29 Feb 2024 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:1638

The Delhi High Court protected residents from demolition of their properties by the Forest Department where no prior notice was issued and the land was not forest land, directing administrative consideration of their claims.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition Article 226 demolition due process of law

Abhay Sapru & Anr. v. State Delhi & Anr.

29 Feb 2024 · Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2024:DHC:1615
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging FIR No. 082/2023 as an abuse of process, holding that parties cannot file multiple petitions with conflicting grounds to circumvent court orders.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant abuse of process quashing of FIR settlement agreement false statement

Rushikesh Balshiram Borhade v. Union of India & Ors.

29 Feb 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:1612-DB

The Delhi High Court held that judicial interference with expert medical board findings on fitness for CAPF training is minimal and dismissed the petition challenging the medical boards' declaration of unfitness.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Article 226 judicial review medical board review medical board

Devki Devi v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

29 Feb 2024 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:1639

The Delhi High Court protected the petitioner’s property from demolition by the Forest Department, holding that demolition notices against non-forest land without proper demarcation and prior notice are unlawful.

property petition_allowed writ petition Article 226 demolition notice forest land

Chanchali Gowrinaidu v. Indian Coast Guard

29 Feb 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:1610-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging rejection of candidature in Indian Coast Guard recruitment due to late submission of category certificate and held that mandatory conditions in recruitment advertisements must be strictly complied with.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant recruitment process mandatory document submission category certificate OBC category

Mohammad Hakim and Anr v. Delhi Development Authority

29 Feb 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh

Delhi High Court set aside DDA's rejection of rehabilitation claims of first-floor Kathputli Colony dwellers lacking separate ration cards, directing allotment based on evidence of independent occupation and policy interpretation.

property appeal_allowed Significant Kathputli Colony DDA Rehabilitation and Relocation Policy, 2015 ration card first floor jhuggi

Geeta Ojha v. State (Govt.) NCT of Delhi & Anr.

29 Feb 2024 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2024:DHC:1881

The High Court quashed the criminal complaint under Section 138 NI Act against a petitioner who was not issued a statutory legal notice and was not a signatory to the cheque, holding that prosecution without these conditions is impermissible.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Dishonour of cheque Legal notice requirement Joint liability